Sainte-Antoine Hospital–Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;18(6):979-81. doi: 10.3201/eid1806.111188.
The sensitivity and specificity of surveillance for Clostridium difficile infections according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, codes were compared with laboratory results as standard. Sensitivity was 35.6%; specificity was 99.9%. Concordance between the 2 methods was moderate. Surveillance based on ICD-10 codes underestimated the rate based on laboratory results.
根据国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)代码对艰难梭菌感染的监测的敏感性和特异性与实验室结果作为标准进行了比较。敏感性为 35.6%;特异性为 99.9%。两种方法之间的一致性为中等。基于 ICD-10 代码的监测低估了基于实验室结果的发生率。