• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICD-10 编码对艰难梭菌感染监测的准确性，法国。

Accuracy of ICD-10 codes for surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections, France.

机构信息

Sainte-Antoine Hospital–Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;18(6):979-81. doi: 10.3201/eid1806.111188.

DOI:10.3201/eid1806.111188
PMID:22607707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3358151/
Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of surveillance for Clostridium difficile infections according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, codes were compared with laboratory results as standard. Sensitivity was 35.6%; specificity was 99.9%. Concordance between the 2 methods was moderate. Surveillance based on ICD-10 codes underestimated the rate based on laboratory results.

摘要

根据国际疾病分类第 10 版（ICD-10）代码对艰难梭菌感染的监测的敏感性和特异性与实验室结果作为标准进行了比较。敏感性为 35.6%；特异性为 99.9%。两种方法之间的一致性为中等。基于 ICD-10 代码的监测低估了基于实验室结果的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef40/3358151/79f2cd85013a/11-1188-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef40/3358151/5314f728a903/11-1188-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef40/3358151/79f2cd85013a/11-1188-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef40/3358151/5314f728a903/11-1188-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef40/3358151/79f2cd85013a/11-1188-F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of ICD-10 codes for surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections, France.ICD-10 编码对艰难梭菌感染监测的准确性，法国。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;18(6):979-81. doi: 10.3201/eid1806.111188.
2
Epidemiology of infections, France, 2010 to 2017.2010 年至 2017 年法国传染病的流行病学。
Euro Surveill. 2019 Aug;24(35). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.35.1800638.
3
High colonization rate and prolonged shedding of Clostridium difficile in pediatric oncology patients.儿科肿瘤患者艰难梭菌的高定植率和长期排菌
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 1;59(3):401-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu302. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
Quantification of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated-diarrhea patients.艰难梭菌在抗生素相关性腹泻患者中的定量分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Oct;49(10):3656-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05115-11. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
5
Are Clostridioides difficile infections being overdiagnosed in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients?造血干细胞移植受者中是否存在艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断？
Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;22(4):e13279. doi: 10.1111/tid.13279. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染。
Am J Med Sci. 2010 Sep;340(3):247-52. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181e939d8.
7
Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?是否需要重复聚合酶链反应（PCR）来诊断艰难梭菌感染？
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3738-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00722-10. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
8
Diagnostic approach to Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染的诊断方法
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;29(4):137-9. doi: 10.1007/s12664-010-0038-8. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
9
Variability in testing policies and impact on reported Clostridium difficile infection rates: results from the pilot Longitudinal European Clostridium difficile Infection Diagnosis surveillance study (LuCID).检测政策的变异性及其对艰难梭菌感染报告率的影响：欧洲艰难梭菌感染纵向诊断监测试点研究（LuCID）的结果
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;35(12):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2746-1. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Evaluation of a new molecular test, the BD Max Cdiff, for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples.评估一种新的分子检测方法，BD Max Cdiff，用于检测粪便样本中的产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Sep;50(9):3089-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01250-12. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死机械通气患者的应激性溃疡预防
JACC Adv. 2023 Dec 6;3(1):100750. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100750. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
The combined effect of systemic antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors on Clostridioides difficile infection and recurrence.系统抗生素和质子泵抑制剂联合应用对艰难梭菌感染和复发的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Mar 1;79(3):608-616. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae012.
3
Performance of French medico-administrative databases in epidemiology of infectious diseases: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Biology of Clostridium difficile: implications for epidemiology and diagnosis.艰难梭菌的生物学特性：对流行病学和诊断的影响。
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:501-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102824.
2
Surveillance for Clostridium difficile infection: ICD-9 coding has poor sensitivity compared to laboratory diagnosis in hospital patients, Singapore.艰难梭菌感染监测：与实验室诊断相比，新加坡住院患者的 ICD-9 编码敏感性较差。
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 20;6(1):e15603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015603.
3
Automated surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections using BioSense.
法国医管数据库在传染病流行病学中的应用效果：范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 12;11:1161550. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1161550. eCollection 2023.
4
Evidence of within-facility patient-patient infection spread across diverse settings.有证据表明，医疗机构内患者与患者之间的感染在不同环境中传播。
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Dec 11;151:e4. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822001893.
5
Clusters of conditions among US service members diagnosed with mild TBI from 2017 through 2019.2017年至2019年期间被诊断为轻度创伤性脑损伤的美国军人中的病症集群。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 9;13:976892. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.976892. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparative Safety and Attributable Healthcare Expenditures Following Inappropriate Versus Appropriate Outpatient Antibiotic Prescriptions Among Adults With Upper Respiratory Infections.成人上呼吸道感染患者中，不适当与适当门诊抗生素处方的比较安全性和可归因医疗费用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 21;76(6):986-995. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac879.
7
Association of Inappropriate Outpatient Pediatric Antibiotic Prescriptions With Adverse Drug Events and Health Care Expenditures.不适当的儿科门诊抗生素处方与药物不良事件和医疗费用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214153. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14153.
8
Effect of clinical versus administrative data definitions on the epidemiology of C. difficile among hospitalized individuals with IBD: a population-based cohort study.基于人群的队列研究：临床与行政数据定义对住院 IBD 患者艰难梭菌流行病学的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02223-y.
9
Prevalence in the United States: National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2018.美国的患病率：2016年至2018年全国住院患者样本。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 30;8(9):ofab409. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab409. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Prevalence of Comorbidities in Active and Reserve Service Members Pre and Post Traumatic Brain Injury, 2017-2019.2017 - 2019年现役和预备役军人创伤性脑损伤前后共病的患病率
Mil Med. 2023 Jan 5;188(1-2):e270-e277. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab342.
使用 BioSense 自动监测艰难梭菌感染。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):26-33. doi: 10.1086/657633. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
4
Global epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in 2010.2010 年艰难梭菌感染的全球流行病学。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;31 Suppl 1:S32-4. doi: 10.1086/655998.
5
Multicenter study of surveillance for hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection by the use of ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes.多中心研究使用 ICD-9-CM 诊断代码对医院获得性艰难梭菌感染进行监测。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;31(3):262-8. doi: 10.1086/650447.
6
ICD-9 codes and surveillance for Clostridium difficile-associated disease.用于艰难梭菌相关疾病的国际疾病分类第九版编码及监测
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Oct;12(10):1576-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1210.060016.
7
Accuracy of ICD-9 coding for Clostridium difficile infections: a retrospective cohort.国际疾病分类第九版（ICD-9）对艰难梭菌感染编码的准确性：一项回顾性队列研究
Epidemiol Infect. 2007 Aug;135(6):1010-3. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007655. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
8
Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe.北美和欧洲艰难梭菌相关疾病的出现。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Oct;12 Suppl 6:2-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01580.x.
9
Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.1996 - 2003年美国短期住院医院出院患者的艰难梭菌感染情况
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;12(3):409-15. doi: 10.3201/eid1205.051064.
10
A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的多机构主要克隆性暴发，发病率和死亡率高。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2442-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051639. Epub 2005 Dec 1.