• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达成直肠癌指南的共识并使其得到认可的最佳方法是什么?

What is the Best Way to Produce Consensus and Buy in to Guidelines for Rectal Cancer?

作者信息

Wong Rebecca K S, Brierley James, Brouwers Melissa

出版信息

Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2012 Jun;8(2):83-89. doi: 10.1007/s11888-012-0121-x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11888-012-0121-x
PMID:22611341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3343240/
Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines are important tools and common pathways for translating evidence into clinical practice. It is most urgently needed when significant heterogeneity in practice exist. Actively engaging opinion leaders in the process of evidence-based guidelines development is important for several reasons. These include allowing the collective views of the practice communities to be represented, resolving heterogeneity in practice through discussion, and allowing credible recommendations to be formulated. Most importantly, the process itself is a tool for facilitating dissemination and implementation. Recognizing the gap between practice pattern and guideline recommendations, and devising strategies to address it represent an important step toward maximizing concordance between guideline and practice. Evidence-based recommendations serve as important reference points, against which we can measure, debate, and innovate from.

摘要

循证指南是将证据转化为临床实践的重要工具和通用途径。当实践中存在显著异质性时,这一需求最为迫切。让意见领袖积极参与循证指南的制定过程很重要,原因有以下几点。这些原因包括使实践群体的集体观点得到体现,通过讨论解决实践中的异质性,并形成可信的建议。最重要的是,这个过程本身就是促进传播和实施的工具。认识到实践模式与指南建议之间的差距,并制定应对策略,是朝着使指南与实践达到最大程度一致迈出的重要一步。循证建议是重要的参考点,我们可以据此进行衡量、辩论和创新。

相似文献

1
What is the Best Way to Produce Consensus and Buy in to Guidelines for Rectal Cancer?达成直肠癌指南的共识并使其得到认可的最佳方法是什么?
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2012 Jun;8(2):83-89. doi: 10.1007/s11888-012-0121-x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Evidence-based clinical guidelines in Kyrgyz Republic.吉尔吉斯共和国基于证据的临床指南。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S45-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150683.
5
ESHRE guideline: endometriosis.ESHRE 指南:子宫内膜异位症。
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 26;2022(2):hoac009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009. eCollection 2022.
6
ESHRE guideline: medically assisted reproduction in patients with a viral infection/disease.欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会指南:病毒感染/疾病患者的医学辅助生殖
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Oct 25;2021(4):hoab037. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab037. eCollection 2021.
7
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022.欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会指南:复发性流产:2022年更新版
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Mar 2;2023(1):hoad002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad002. eCollection 2023.
8
Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;108(10):2447-2469. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463.
9
ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation.欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会指南:女性生育力保存
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Nov 14;2020(4):hoaa052. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa052. eCollection 2020.
10
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理的国际循证指南推荐意见。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.

引用本文的文献

1
Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion.在审议性参与中分享意见以提高牙科诊所的指南遵循率:对在线审议论坛讨论进行定性评估的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):e072727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072727.
2
Obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI): Canada's national clinical practice guideline.产科臂丛神经损伤(OBPI):加拿大国家临床实践指南。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e014141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014141.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
2
Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation.指南改编:提高指南制定效率和利用度的方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):228-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.043257. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
3
Systematic review of practice guideline dissemination and implementation strategies for healthcare teams and team-based practice.系统评价医疗保健团队和以团队为基础的实践的实践指南传播和实施策略。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2010 Jun;8(2):79-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00166.x.
4
Preoperative or postoperative therapy for stage II or III rectal cancer: an updated practice guideline.直肠癌 II 期或 III 期的术前或术后治疗:更新的实践指南。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 May;22(4):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.03.002.
5
Whose guidelines are they anyway?反正这些指导方针是谁制定的?
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 May;22(4):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
6
The payoff time: a flexible framework to help clinicians decide when patients with comorbid disease are not likely to benefit from practice guidelines.收益时间:一个灵活的框架,以帮助临床医生判定合并症患者何时不太可能从实践指南中获益。
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):610-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819748d5.
7
Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial.直肠癌患者术前放疗与选择性术后放化疗的比较(MRC CR07和NCIC-CTG C016):一项多中心随机试验
Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0.
8
Combining information from cancer registry and medical records data to improve analyses of adjuvant cancer therapies.整合癌症登记处和医疗记录数据中的信息,以改进辅助性癌症治疗的分析。
Biometrics. 2009 Sep;65(3):946-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01164.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review.影响医疗保健专业人员临床指南实施的因素:一项系统性的元综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Sep 12;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-38.
10
Assessing the quality of colorectal cancer care: do we have appropriate quality measures? (A systematic review of literature).评估结直肠癌护理质量:我们是否有恰当的质量衡量标准?(文献系统综述)
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;13(6):831-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00762.x.