• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于目标最小损失的多个时间点干预因果效应估计

Targeted minimum loss based estimation of causal effects of multiple time point interventions.

作者信息

van der Laan Mark J, Gruber Susan

机构信息

University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2012;8(1). doi: 10.1515/1557-4679.1370.

DOI:10.1515/1557-4679.1370
PMID:22611591
Abstract

We consider estimation of the effect of a multiple time point intervention on an outcome of interest, where the intervention nodes are subject to time-dependent confounding by intermediate covariates. In previous work van der Laan (2010) and Stitelman and van der Laan (2011a) developed and implemented a closed form targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE) relying on the log-likelihood loss function, and demonstrated important gains relative to inverse probability of treatment weighted estimators and estimating equation based estimators. This TMLE relies on an initial estimator of the entire probability distribution of the longitudinal data structure. To enhance the finite sample performance of the TMLE of the target parameter it is of interest to select the smallest possible relevant part of the data generating distribution, which is estimated and updated by TMLE. Inspired by this goal, we develop a new closed form TMLE of an intervention specific mean outcome based on general longitudinal data structures. The target parameter is represented as an iterative sequence of conditional expectations of the outcome of interest. This collection of conditional means represents the relevant part, which is estimated and updated using the general TMLE algorithm. We also develop this new TMLE for other causal parameters, such as parameters defined by working marginal structural models. The theoretical properties of the TMLE are also practically demonstrated with a small scale simulation study.The proposed TMLE is building upon a previously proposed estimator Bang and Robins (2005) by integrating some of its key and innovative ideas into the TMLE framework.

摘要

我们考虑估计多时间点干预对感兴趣结局的影响,其中干预节点受到中间协变量随时间变化的混杂影响。在之前的工作中,范德·拉恩(2010年)以及斯蒂特尔曼和范德·拉恩(2011年a)开发并实施了一种基于对数似然损失函数的封闭形式目标最大似然估计器(TMLE),并证明相对于治疗逆概率加权估计器和基于估计方程的估计器有显著优势。这种TMLE依赖于纵向数据结构整个概率分布的初始估计器。为了提高目标参数TMLE的有限样本性能,选择数据生成分布中尽可能小的相关部分是有意义的,该部分由TMLE进行估计和更新。受此目标启发,我们基于一般纵向数据结构开发了一种针对特定干预平均结局的新封闭形式TMLE。目标参数表示为感兴趣结局的条件期望的迭代序列。这组条件均值代表相关部分,使用一般TMLE算法对其进行估计和更新。我们还针对其他因果参数开发了这种新的TMLE,例如由工作边际结构模型定义的参数。通过小规模模拟研究实际展示了TMLE的理论性质。所提出的TMLE是在之前提出的估计器班和罗宾斯(2005年)的基础上,将其一些关键和创新思想整合到TMLE框架中构建而成的。

相似文献

1
Targeted minimum loss based estimation of causal effects of multiple time point interventions.基于目标最小损失的多个时间点干预因果效应估计
Int J Biostat. 2012;8(1). doi: 10.1515/1557-4679.1370.
2
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models.动态和静态纵向边际结构工作模型的靶向最大似然估计
J Causal Inference. 2014 Jun 18;2(2):147-185. doi: 10.1515/jci-2013-0007.
3
Targeted minimum loss based estimator that outperforms a given estimator.基于目标最小损失的估计器,其性能优于给定的估计器。
Int J Biostat. 2012 May 18;8(1):Article 11. doi: 10.1515/1557-4679.1332.
4
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
5
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.
6
Doubly Robust and Efficient Estimation of Marginal Structural Models for the Hazard Function.风险函数边际结构模型的双重稳健与有效估计
Int J Biostat. 2016 May 1;12(1):233-52. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0036.
7
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for dynamic treatment regimes in sequentially randomized controlled trials.序贯随机对照试验中动态治疗方案的靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2012 Jun 22;8(1):Article 14. doi: 10.1515/1557-4679.1406.
8
Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.具有反事实效应修饰因子的边际结构模型。
Int J Biostat. 2018 Jun 8;14(1):/j/ijb.2018.14.issue-1/ijb-2018-0039/ijb-2018-0039.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2018-0039.
9
Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.基于靶向最大似然法的因果推断:第一部分。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 2. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1211.
10
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal estimation of time-varying treatments in observational studies: a scoping review of methods, applications, and missing data practices.观察性研究中时变治疗的因果估计:方法、应用及缺失数据处理的范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02633-y.
2
Robust evaluation of longitudinal surrogate markers with censored data.对带有删失数据的纵向替代标志物进行稳健评估。
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2024 Dec 26;87(3):891-907. doi: 10.1093/jrsssb/qkae119. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Causal Inference in Presence of Intra-Patient Correlation due to Repeated Measurements of Exposure and Outcome in Longitudinal Settings.
纵向研究中因暴露和结局的重复测量而存在患者内相关性时的因果推断。
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70037. doi: 10.1002/sim.70037.
4
Vasodilator drugs and heart-related outcomes in systemic sclerosis: an exploratory analysis.血管扩张剂药物与系统性硬化症的心脏相关结局:一项探索性分析。
RMD Open. 2024 Dec 9;10(4):e004918. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004918.
5
Kernel Debiased Plug-in Estimation: Simultaneous, Automated Debiasing without Influence Functions for Many Target Parameters.内核去偏插件估计:针对多个目标参数的同时、自动去偏且无需影响函数
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2024 Jul;235:8534-8555.
6
Learning optimal dynamic treatment regimes from longitudinal data.从纵向数据中学习最优动态治疗方案。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 2;193(12):1768-1775. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae122.
7
Longitudinal patterns of natural hazard exposures and anxiety and depression symptoms among young adults in four low- and middle-income countries.在四个中低收入国家中,年轻人自然危害暴露与焦虑和抑郁症状的纵向模式。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 8;14(1):10538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60106-6.
8
Physical activity across midlife and health-related quality of life in Australian women: A target trial emulation using a longitudinal cohort.中年期身体活动与澳大利亚女性健康相关生活质量:基于纵向队列的目标试验模拟。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 2;21(5):e1004384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004384. eCollection 2024 May.
9
The HOPE4MCI study: A randomized double-blind assessment of AGB101 for the treatment of MCI due to AD.HOPE4MCI研究:AGB101治疗阿尔茨海默病所致轻度认知障碍的随机双盲评估。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024 Jan 24;10(1):e12446. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12446. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
10
Efficient Estimation under Data Fusion.数据融合下的有效估计
Biometrika. 2023 Dec;110(4):1041-1054. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asad007. Epub 2023 Feb 6.