Department IV-Military Ergonomics and Exercise Physiology, Central Institute of Federal Armed Forces Medical Services, Koblenz, Germany.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 2:S15-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825cf0dc.
The number of sedentary young adults has dramatically increased in past decades, and sedentary lifestyles are adopted at an increasingly earlier age. Little is known about barriers or predictors to (re)initiate regular physical activity in this group. The purpose of the study is to (a) identify subgroups in nonathletes differing in their amenability to physical exercise, (b) to analyze them for differences in barriers and intention to exercise, and (c) compare importance of sports during youth in nonathletes to trained peers. Using a health and fitness questionnaire 589 nonathletes were queried in the cross-sectional survey and compared with 270 trained peers. Athletic abstainers (A), lower (L), and higher (H) motivated nonathletes were separated based on previous engagement in sports. Of the nonathletes, 54.7% reported only 1 barrier to exercise. Although this feature was most prominent in H (71.5%), the other groups showed significantly more barriers and a broader distribution. Similar characteristics but minor differences were observed for perceived importance of sports during youth. The most significant differences between athletes and nonathletes emerged enquiring the attitude and activity of the parents. The majority of nonathletes (72.8%) indicate their intention to exercise in the future. Their intention differed significantly in H (88.1%), L (76.1%), and A (59.1%). However, there are good reasons to doubt that most of those intending nonathletes will actually become physically active. Even in the analyzed narrow age range of men different motivated groups of nonathletes were found. Because of the differences in receptiveness and approachability health promotion policies may not only consider the often recommended tailored interventions but also carefully designed incentive programs.
在过去几十年中,久坐不动的年轻成年人的数量急剧增加,而且这种久坐的生活方式在越来越早的年龄就被采用。对于这一群体重新开始定期进行体育活动的障碍或预测因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是:(a) 确定在运动接受度方面存在差异的非运动员亚组;(b) 分析他们在运动障碍和运动意愿方面的差异;(c) 比较非运动员和训练有素的同龄人在青年时期对运动的重视程度。使用健康和健身问卷,对 589 名非运动员进行了横断面调查,并与 270 名训练有素的同龄人进行了比较。根据以前的运动参与情况,将竞技弃权者(A)、低(L)和高(H)动机的非运动员分开。在非运动员中,54.7%的人报告只有 1 个运动障碍。尽管这一特征在 H 组中最为明显(71.5%),但其他组显示出明显更多的障碍和更广泛的分布。在青少年时期对运动的重视程度方面也观察到了类似的特征,但存在细微差异。在询问运动员和非运动员的态度和活动时,出现了最显著的差异。大多数非运动员(72.8%)表示他们将来有锻炼的意愿。他们的意愿在 H 组(88.1%)、L 组(76.1%)和 A 组(59.1%)之间存在显著差异。然而,有充分的理由怀疑,那些有意愿的非运动员中的大多数实际上会变得积极参加体育活动。即使在分析的男性年龄范围内,也发现了不同动机的非运动员群体。由于接受程度和可接近性的差异,健康促进政策可能不仅要考虑到经常推荐的定制干预措施,还要考虑到精心设计的激励计划。