Singh Rohit K, Behari Sanjay, Kumar Vijendra, Jaiswal Awadhesh K, Jain Vijendra K
Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;7(1):2-11. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.95687.
Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are associated with multiple anatomical variations of the parent vessel. Complexities in their surgical clipping relate to narrow corridors limited by brain-stem, petrous-occipital bones, and multiple neurovascular structures occupying the cerebellomedullary and cerebellopontine cisterns.
The present study focuses on surgical considerations during clipping of saccular PICA aneurysms.
Tertiary care, retrospective study.
In 20 patients with PICA aneurysms, CT angiogram/digital substraction angiogram was used to correlate the site and anatomical variations of aneurysms located on different segments of PICA with the approach selected, the difficulties encountered and the final outcome.
Comparison of means and percentages.
ANEURYSMS WERE LOCATED ON PICA AT: vertebral artery/basilar artery (VA/BA)-PICA (n=5); anterior medullary (n=4); lateral medullary (n=3); tonsillomedullary (n=4); and, telovelotonsillar (n=4) segments. The Hunt and Hess grade distribution was I in 15; II in 2; and, III in 3 patients (mean ictus-surgery interval: 23.5 days; range: 3-150 days). Eight patients had hydrocephalus. Anatomical variations included giant, thrombosed aneurysms; 2 PICA aneurysms proximal to an arteriovenous malformation; bilobed or multiple aneurysms; low PICA situated at the foramen magnum with a hypoplastic VA; and fenestrated PICA. The approaches included a retromastoid suboccipital craniectomy (n=9); midline suboccipital craniectomy (n=6); and far-lateral approach (n=5). At a follow-up (range 6 months-2.5 years), 13 patients had no deficits (modified Rankin score (mRS) 0); 2 were symptomatic with no significant disability (mRS1); 1 had mild disability (mRS2); 1 had moderately severe disability (mRS4); and 3 died (mRS6). Three mortalities were caused by vasospasm (2) and, rupture of unclipped second VA-BA junctional aneurysm (1).
PICA aneurysms may present with only IV(th) ventricular blood without subarachnoid hemorrhage. PICA may have multiple anomalies and its aneurysms may be missed on CT angiograms. Surgical approach is influenced by VA-BA tortuosity and variations in anatomy, location of the VA-BA junction and the PICA aneurysm relative to the brain-stem, and the pattern of collateral supply. The special category of VA-PICA junctional aneurysms and its management; and, the multiple anatomical variations of PICA aneurysms, merit special surgical considerations and have been highlighted in this study.
小脑后下动脉(PICA)动脉瘤与母血管的多种解剖变异相关。其手术夹闭的复杂性与脑干、岩枕骨以及占据小脑延髓池和小脑脑桥池的多个神经血管结构所限制的狭窄通道有关。
本研究聚焦于囊状PICA动脉瘤夹闭术中的手术考量。
三级医疗,回顾性研究。
对20例PICA动脉瘤患者,采用CT血管造影/数字减影血管造影,将位于PICA不同节段的动脉瘤的部位和解剖变异与所选入路、遇到的困难及最终结果进行关联分析。
均值和百分比比较。
动脉瘤位于PICA的部位为:椎动脉/基底动脉(VA/BA)-PICA段(n = 5);延髓前段(n = 4);延髓外侧段(n = 3);扁桃体延髓段(n = 4);以及小脑幕扁桃体段(n = 4)。Hunt和Hess分级分布为:15例为I级;2例为II级;3例为III级(平均发病至手术间隔:23.5天;范围:3 - 150天)。8例患者有脑积水。解剖变异包括巨大、血栓形成的动脉瘤;2例PICA动脉瘤靠近动静脉畸形;双叶或多发动脉瘤;位于枕骨大孔处且椎动脉发育不全的低位PICA;以及开窗型PICA。入路包括乳突后枕下颅骨切除术(n = 9);枕下中线颅骨切除术(n = 6);以及远外侧入路(n = 5)。随访(范围6个月 - 2.5年)时,13例患者无神经功能缺损(改良Rankin评分(mRS)0);2例有症状但无明显残疾(mRS 1);1例有轻度残疾(mRS 2);1例有中度严重残疾(mRS 4);3例死亡(mRS 6)。3例死亡原因分别为血管痉挛(2例)和未夹闭的第二处VA - BA交界处动脉瘤破裂(1例)。
PICA动脉瘤可能仅表现为第四脑室积血而无蛛网膜下腔出血。PICA可能有多种异常,其动脉瘤在CT血管造影上可能被漏诊。手术入路受VA - BA迂曲度、解剖变异、VA - BA交界处位置以及PICA动脉瘤相对于脑干的位置和侧支供血模式影响。VA - PICA交界处动脉瘤这一特殊类型及其处理;以及PICA动脉瘤的多种解剖变异,值得特别的手术考量,本研究已对此进行了重点强调。