GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, 5 Moore Dr, Bide West, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Respir Res. 2012 May 31;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-41.
There are limited data describing patients with moderate COPD exacerbations and evaluating comparative effectiveness of maintenance treatments in this patient population. The study examined COPD patients with moderate COPD exacerbations. COPD-related outcomes were compared between patients initiating fluticasone propionate-salmeterol 250/50 mcg (FSC) vs anticholinergics (ACs) following a moderate COPD exacerbation.
This retrospective observational study used a large administrative claims database (study period: 2003-2009) to identify and describe patients with an initial, moderate COPD exacerbation. A descriptive analysis of patients with moderate COPD exacerbations was done evaluating maintenance treatment rates, subsequent COPD exacerbation rates, and COPD-related costs during a 1-year period. A cohort analysis compared COPD exacerbation rates and associated costs during a variable-length follow-up period between patients initiating maintenance therapy with FSC or ACs. COPD exacerbations were reported as rate per 100 patient-years, and monthly costs were reported (standardized to USD 2009). COPD exacerbation rates between cohorts were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models, and costs were analyzed using generalized linear models with log-link and gamma distribution.
21,524 patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were identified. Only 25% initiated maintenance therapy, and 13% had a subsequent exacerbation. Annual costs averaged $594 per patient. A total of 2,849 treated patients (FSC = 925; AC = 1,924) were eligible for the cohort analysis. The FSC cohort had a significantly lower rate of COPD exacerbations compared to the AC cohort (20.8 vs 32.8; P = 0.04). After adjusting for differences in baseline covariates, the FSC cohort had a 42% significantly lower risk of a COPD exacerbation (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.91). The FSC cohort incurred significantly higher adjusted pharmacy costs per patient per month by $37 (95% CI: $19, $72) for COPD-related medications vs the AC cohort. However, this increase was offset by a significant reduction in adjusted monthly medical costs per patient for the FSC vs the AC cohort ($82 vs $112; P < 0.05). Total monthly COPD-related costs, as a result, did not differ between cohorts.
Only a quarter of patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were subsequently treated with maintenance therapy. Initiation of FSC among those treated was associated with better clinical and economic outcomes compared to AC.
目前仅有有限的数据可以描述患有中度 COPD 加重的患者,并且评估该患者人群中维持治疗的比较效果。本研究评估了患有中度 COPD 加重的患者。在中度 COPD 加重后,比较了开始使用丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗 250/50 mcg(FSC)和抗胆碱能药物(ACs)的患者的 COPD 相关结局。
本回顾性观察性研究使用大型行政索赔数据库(研究期间:2003-2009 年),确定并描述了初始中度 COPD 加重的患者。对中度 COPD 加重患者进行描述性分析,评估维持治疗率、随后的 COPD 加重率以及 1 年内的 COPD 相关费用。在不同长度的随访期间,对使用 FSC 或 ACs 开始维持治疗的患者的 COPD 加重率和相关费用进行了队列分析。COPD 加重率以每 100 患者年报告,每月费用按 2009 年美元标准化报告。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估队列间 COPD 加重率,使用具有对数链接和伽马分布的广义线性模型分析费用。
确定了 21524 例中度 COPD 加重患者。只有 25%的患者开始维持治疗,13%的患者发生了随后的加重。每位患者的年平均费用为 594 美元。共有 2849 例接受治疗的患者(FSC=925;AC=1924)符合队列分析的条件。与 AC 队列相比,FSC 队列的 COPD 加重率显著降低(20.8 比 32.8;P=0.04)。在校正基线协变量差异后,FSC 队列发生 COPD 加重的风险显著降低 42%(HR=0.58;95%CI:0.38,0.91)。与 AC 队列相比,FSC 队列的 COPD 相关药物每月每位患者的调整后药房费用显著增加 37 美元(95%CI:19 美元,72 美元)。然而,这一增加被 FSC 与 AC 队列相比,每位患者每月调整后医疗费用的显著降低所抵消(82 美元比 112 美元;P<0.05)。因此,两个队列的 COPD 相关总每月费用没有差异。
只有四分之一的中度 COPD 加重患者随后接受了维持治疗。在接受治疗的患者中,与 AC 相比,开始使用 FSC 与更好的临床和经济结果相关。