J Trauma Dissociation. 2012;13(4):387-96. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2012.672550.
In this editorial, I briefly review research design issues and the current treatment research for dissociative disorders (DD), discuss the limitations and challenges of conducting treatment studies for patients with DD, and conclude by describing what I see as the first wave and second wave in the field of dissociation. Insurers and federally funded programs are increasingly requiring that treatment be empirically supported in order for treatment to be reimbursed. For example, psychoanalysis will no longer be reimbursed in The Netherlands because of what is perceived as a lack of empirical support. Other countries have also established standards about the treatments that have sufficient empirical support to merit government payment. I believe it is only a matter of time before it is common for patients with DD to be required to seek out empirically supported treatment if they want treatment to be reimbursed. We need to financially support treatment studies in order to develop a more solid empirical basis for the treatment of DD.
在这篇社论中,我简要回顾了分离障碍(DD)的研究设计问题和当前的治疗研究,讨论了对 DD 患者进行治疗研究的局限性和挑战,并最后描述了我所认为的分离领域的第一波和第二波。保险公司和联邦资助项目越来越要求治疗有实证支持,才能获得报销。例如,由于缺乏实证支持,在荷兰,精神分析将不再得到报销。其他国家也制定了关于治疗的标准,这些治疗有足够的实证支持,值得政府支付。我相信,要求 DD 患者如果想要治疗得到报销,就必须寻求有实证支持的治疗,这只是时间问题。我们需要为治疗研究提供资金支持,以便为 DD 的治疗建立更坚实的实证基础。