Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
Virchows Arch. 2012 Jul;461(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1258-3. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
Tissue banks constitute decisive and rate-limiting resource and technology platforms for basic and translational biomedical research, notably in the area of cancer. Thus, it is essential to plan and structure tissue banking and allocate resources according to research needs, but essential requirements are still incompletely defined. The tissue bank of the National Center of Tumor Diseases Heidelberg (NCT) was founded with the intention to provide tissues of optimal quality and to prioritize the realization of research projects. We analysed its structure and prospective project management registration as well as tracking records for all projects of the NCT tissue bank as of its start in 2005 in order to obtain information that may be relevant for tissue bank planning. All project proposals submitted to the NCT tissue bank (n = 681) were included in the study. For a detailed evaluation of provided services, only projects that were completed until July 2011 (n = 605) were analysed. For these 605 projects, NCT tissue bank provided 769 specific services. In all projects/services, we recorded project leader, type and amount of material provided, type of research (basic/translational), work load of project and project completion. Furthermore, all completed projects were tracked after 90 days according to a standard protocol to determine principal investigators' (PI) satisfaction and quality of the provided material. Until July 2011, 605 projects had been successfully completed as documented by material transfer agreement. Of the projects, 72.7 % addressed basic research, 22.3 % were translational research projects and 3 % concerned epidemiological research; 91 % (n = 546) concerned a single PI and the NTC tissue bank. For these projects, 769 specific services were provided. Of these services, 288 concerned providing formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue (extracts, full size sections), 126 providing fresh frozen materials (including fresh frozen sections), 137 providing tissue micro-array (TMA)-based sections and 199 providing immunohistochemical services. Project tracking demonstrated that all projects had started within 90 days after reception of the material by the PIs, and PI satisfaction with provided material exceeded 97 %. Standardized registration and tracking provides valuable structural information for planning and financing of tissue banks and allocation of resources. The high number of completed projects as well as high user satisfaction demonstrates that structuring of tissue banks should be preferably research-oriented and highly efficient. The comparable number of requests for FFPE and fresh frozen tissue as well as TMA-based services underpins the need for a broad approach in terms of methods and material types in order to fulfil research needs.
组织库是基础和转化医学研究的决定性和速度限制资源和技术平台,尤其是在癌症领域。因此,根据研究需求规划和构建组织库并分配资源至关重要,但基本要求仍未完全定义。海德堡国家肿瘤中心(NCT)的组织库成立的初衷是提供最佳质量的组织,并优先实现研究项目。我们分析了其结构和未来项目管理注册以及自 2005 年开始的 NCT 组织库的所有项目的跟踪记录,以获取可能对组织库规划有意义的信息。本研究纳入了提交给 NCT 组织库的所有项目提案(n=681)。为了详细评估提供的服务,仅分析了截至 2011 年 7 月完成的项目(n=605)。对于这些 605 个项目,NCT 组织库提供了 769 项特定服务。在所有项目/服务中,我们记录了项目负责人、提供的材料类型和数量、研究类型(基础/转化)、项目工作量和项目完成情况。此外,按照标准方案,在 90 天后对所有已完成的项目进行了跟踪,以确定主要研究者(PI)的满意度和提供材料的质量。截至 2011 年 7 月,有 605 个项目已成功完成,并有材料转移协议作为记录。在这些项目中,72.7%的项目是基础研究,22.3%是转化研究项目,3%是流行病学研究;91%(n=546)是单个 PI 和 NTC 组织库的研究。这些项目提供了 769 项特定服务。其中,288 项涉及提供福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织(提取物、全尺寸切片),126 项涉及提供新鲜冷冻材料(包括新鲜冷冻切片),137 项涉及提供组织微阵列(TMA)切片,199 项涉及免疫组织化学服务。项目跟踪表明,所有项目都在 PI 收到材料后 90 天内开始,PI 对提供材料的满意度超过 97%。标准化注册和跟踪为组织库的规划和融资以及资源分配提供了有价值的结构信息。大量完成的项目和高用户满意度表明,组织库的构建应优先考虑研究导向和高效率。对 FFPE 和新鲜冷冻组织以及基于 TMA 的服务的需求相当,这表明需要在方法和材料类型方面采取广泛的方法,以满足研究需求。