• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双语儿童和单语儿童在学习新单词时会注意不同的线索。

Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words.

作者信息

Brojde Chandra L, Ahmed Sabeen, Colunga Eliana

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 May 25;3:155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00155. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00155
PMID:22654777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3360464/
Abstract

The way in which children learn language can vary depending on their language environment. Previous work suggests that bilingual children may be more sensitive to pragmatic cues from a speaker when learning new words than monolingual children are. On the other hand, monolingual children may rely more heavily on object properties than bilingual children do. In this study we manipulate these two sources of information within the same paradigm, using eye gaze as a pragmatic cue and similarity along different dimensions as an object cue. In the crucial condition, object and pragmatic cues were inconsistent with each other. Our results showed that in this ambiguous condition monolingual children attend more to object property cues whereas bilingual children attend more to pragmatic cues. Control conditions showed that monolingual children were sensitive to eye gaze and bilingual children were sensitive to similarity by shape; it was only when the cues were inconsistent that children's preference for one or the other cue was apparent. Our results suggest that children learn to weigh different cues depending on their relative informativeness in their environment.

摘要

儿童学习语言的方式可能因其语言环境而异。先前的研究表明,在学习新单词时,双语儿童可能比单语儿童对说话者的语用线索更敏感。另一方面,单语儿童可能比双语儿童更依赖物体属性。在本研究中,我们在同一范式内操纵这两种信息来源,将目光注视用作语用线索,将不同维度上的相似性用作物体线索。在关键条件下,物体线索和语用线索相互矛盾。我们的结果表明,在这种模糊条件下,单语儿童更关注物体属性线索,而双语儿童更关注语用线索。控制条件表明,单语儿童对目光注视敏感,双语儿童对形状相似性敏感;只有当线索不一致时,儿童对一种或另一种线索的偏好才会明显。我们的结果表明,儿童学会根据环境中不同线索的相对信息量来权衡它们。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/0dbed76e30e7/fpsyg-03-00155-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/491aba760ca8/fpsyg-03-00155-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/35537a6054bf/fpsyg-03-00155-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/8347e32dcf16/fpsyg-03-00155-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/0dbed76e30e7/fpsyg-03-00155-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/491aba760ca8/fpsyg-03-00155-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/35537a6054bf/fpsyg-03-00155-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/8347e32dcf16/fpsyg-03-00155-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631b/3360464/0dbed76e30e7/fpsyg-03-00155-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words.双语儿童和单语儿童在学习新单词时会注意不同的线索。
Front Psychol. 2012 May 25;3:155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00155. eCollection 2012.
2
Word learning in monolingual and bilingual children: The influence of speaker eye-gaze.单语和双语儿童的词汇学习:说话者眼神注视的影响。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2021 Mar;24(2):333-343. doi: 10.1017/s1366728920000565. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
The role of speaker eye gaze and mutual exclusivity in novel word learning by monolingual and bilingual children.说话者的目光注视和互斥性在单语和双语儿童学习新单词中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;197:104878. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104878. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
4
The effect of speaker reliability on word learning in monolingual and bilingual children.说话者可靠性对单语和双语儿童词汇学习的影响。
Cogn Dev. 2022 Oct-Dec;64. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101252. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
5
Monolingual and bilingual children's processing of coarticulation cues during spoken word recognition.单语和双语儿童在口语识别过程中对协同发音线索的处理。
J Child Lang. 2020 Nov;47(6):1189-1206. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000100. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Effect of speaker certainty on novel word learning in monolingual and bilingual children.说话者确定性对单语和双语儿童新单词学习的影响。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2019 Aug;22(4):883-895. doi: 10.1017/s1366728918000536. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Surmounting the Tower of Babel: Monolingual and bilingual 2-year-olds' understanding of the nature of foreign language words.克服巴别塔:单语和双语 2 岁儿童对外语词汇本质的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Mar;119:87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
8
Bilingual children weigh speaker's referential cues and word-learning heuristics differently in different language contexts when interpreting a speaker's intent.双语儿童在解读说话者意图时,在不同的语言环境中对说话者的指称线索和词汇学习启发法的权衡方式有所不同。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 10;6:796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00796. eCollection 2015.
9
Children's use of linguistic information when learning in a bilingual context.儿童在双语环境中学习时对语言信息的运用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Apr;144:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
A bilingual advantage in 54-month-olds' use of referential cues in fast mapping.54个月大幼儿在快速映射中使用指称线索的双语优势。
Dev Sci. 2017 Jan;20(1). doi: 10.1111/desc.12482. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Word learning in monolingual and bilingual children: The influence of speaker eye-gaze.单语和双语儿童的词汇学习:说话者眼神注视的影响。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2021 Mar;24(2):333-343. doi: 10.1017/s1366728920000565. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
The effect of speaker reliability on word learning in monolingual and bilingual children.说话者可靠性对单语和双语儿童词汇学习的影响。
Cogn Dev. 2022 Oct-Dec;64. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101252. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
Effect of speaker certainty on novel word learning in monolingual and bilingual children.

本文引用的文献

1
Language Experience Shapes the Development of the Mutual Exclusivity Bias.语言经验塑造了互斥性偏差的发展。
Infancy. 2010 Mar;15(2):125-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00009.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
2
Correlation versus prediction in children's word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations.儿童词汇学习中的相关性与预测性:跨语言证据与模拟
Lang Cogn. 2009 Oct 1;1(2):197-217. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.010.
3
Word Mapping and Executive Functioning in Young Monolingual and Bilingual Children.单语和双语幼儿的词汇映射与执行功能
说话者确定性对单语和双语儿童新单词学习的影响。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2019 Aug;22(4):883-895. doi: 10.1017/s1366728918000536. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
4
The effects of bilingualism on children's cross-situational word learning under different variability conditions.双语对不同变异性条件下儿童跨情境词汇学习的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 May;229:105621. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105621. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
5
Social-Pragmatic Skills and Length of Bilingualism Predict Inhibitory Control in Children.社会语用技能和双语时长预测儿童的抑制控制。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Oct 17;65(10):3873-3880. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00625. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
Shared Multimodal Input Through Social Coordination: Infants With Monolingual and Bilingual Learning Experiences.通过社会协调共享多模态输入:具有单语和双语学习经历的婴儿
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:745904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745904. eCollection 2022.
7
The development of gaze following in monolingual and bilingual infants: A multi-laboratory study.单语和双语婴儿的目光追随发展:一项多实验室研究。
Infancy. 2021 Jan;26(1):4-38. doi: 10.1111/infa.12360. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
The role of speaker eye gaze and mutual exclusivity in novel word learning by monolingual and bilingual children.说话者的目光注视和互斥性在单语和双语儿童学习新单词中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;197:104878. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104878. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
9
From Klingon to Colbertian: Using Artificial Languages to Study Word Learning.从克林贡语到科尔伯式语言:运用人工语言研究词汇学习
Biling (Camb Engl). 2020 Jan;23(1):74-80. doi: 10.1017/S1366728919000592. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
Children's reliance on the non-verbal cues of a robot versus a human.儿童对机器人和人类的非言语线索的依赖。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 19;14(12):e0217833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217833. eCollection 2019.
J Cogn Dev. 2010 Oct 1;11(4):485-508. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2010.516420.
4
Knowledge as process: contextually-cued attention and early word learning.知识即过程:语境线索注意力与早期词汇学习。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep;34(7):1287-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01130.x.
5
Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference.幼儿在解释指涉行为时会跟随指向文字的动作。
Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):252-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00871.x.
6
The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.新语学习中的双语优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):705-10. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.705.
7
Learning words: children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity.学习词汇:儿童会忽略一些与互斥性相冲突的语用信息。
Dev Sci. 2006 Mar;9(2):158-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00475.x.
8
The principles of conventionality and contrast in word learning: an empirical examination.词汇学习中的常规性与对比性原则:一项实证研究。
Dev Psychol. 2005 May;41(3):451-63. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.451.
9
From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning.从词汇表到对类别期望:联想学习的作用。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Apr;112(2):347-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.347.
10
Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task.双语儿童的注意力与抑制能力:来自维度变化卡片分类任务的证据。
Dev Sci. 2004 Jun;7(3):325-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00351.x.