• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.乳腺断层合成摄影术与数字乳腺钼靶摄影:诊断准确性比较。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1074-82. doi: 10.1259/bjr/53282892. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
2
The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.在一项自由反应观察者性能研究中,双视角数字乳腺摄影、单视角乳腺断层合成以及乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺摄影的双视角组合的诊断准确性。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):113-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq044. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
3
Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.数字乳腺断层合成作为数字乳腺X线摄影的辅助手段用于检测和表征浸润性小叶癌:一项多阅片者研究
Clin Radiol. 2016 Sep;71(9):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.已知患有乳腺癌的女性中,数字乳腺断层合成以及数字乳腺钼靶联合磁共振成像的诊断性能比较。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1556-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3998-3. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.乳腺断层合成术:与数字乳腺摄影术和超声检查相比,肿瘤测量的准确性。
Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):240-7. doi: 10.3109/02841850903524447.
6
A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.一项比较数字乳腺摄影、乳腺断层合成和锥形束CT乳腺成像的病变检测准确性的计算机模拟研究。
Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):1041-52. doi: 10.1118/1.2174127.
7
Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.数字乳腺 X 线摄影与数字乳腺 X 线摄影联合单视图和双视图断层合成的诊断准确性和召回率:富集读者研究结果。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Feb;202(2):273-81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11240.
8
Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.单视角数字乳腺断层合成与单视角数字乳腺钼靶摄影联合应用与标准双视角数字乳腺钼靶摄影的比较:基于病变的分析。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2087-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2831-0. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
9
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺摄影:在乳腺钼靶检查结果不明显的癌症人群中乳腺癌可见性及乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)分类的比较
Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2817-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9. Epub 2008 Jul 19.
10
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.数字乳腺断层合成与乳腺钼靶及超声检查的比较:一项多阅读者性能研究。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2863-5. Epub 2013 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
study of the impact of system design parameters on microcalcification detection in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis.广角数字乳腺断层合成中系统设计参数对微钙化检测影响的研究。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13002. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Breast Radiologists' Perceptions on the Detection and Management of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Most Agree Imaging Beyond Mammography Is Warranted.乳腺放射科医生对浸润性小叶癌的检测和管理的看法:大多数人认为超出乳腺 X 线摄影的影像学检查是有必要的。
J Breast Imaging. 2024 Apr 1;6(2):157-165. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad112.
3
Lesion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: human reader experiments indicate no benefit from the integration of information from multiple planes.数字化乳腺断层合成中的病变检测:人体阅片实验表明,整合来自多个层面的信息并无益处。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 1):S11915. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11915. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.两种视图与单视图数字乳腺断层合成与二维乳腺 X 线摄影在乳腺癌监测成像中的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 29;16(9):e0256514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256514. eCollection 2021.
5
Classification of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis using ensemble convolutional neural network.基于集成卷积神经网络的数字乳腺断层合成中微钙化簇的分类。
Biomed Eng Online. 2021 Jul 28;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00908-1.
6
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview.数字乳腺断层合成:概述
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;12(2):315-329. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01310-y. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with 2D mammography for the characterisation of mammographic abnormalities.数字乳腺断层合成与 2D 乳腺摄影联合用于乳腺异常特征化的诊断准确性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77456-6.
8
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Additional Diagnostic Mammographic Views for the Evaluation of Asymmetric Mammographic Densities.数字化乳腺断层合成术与额外的乳腺钼靶诊断性投照用于评估乳腺钼靶不对称性致密影的比较
Cureus. 2020 Aug 10;12(8):e9637. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9637.
9
Reader characteristics and mammogram features associated with breast imaging reporting scores.与乳腺影像报告和数据系统评分相关的读者特征和乳腺 X 线摄影特征。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Oct 1;93(1114):20200363. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200363. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
10
Human observer performance on in-plane digital breast tomosynthesis images: Effects of reconstruction filters and data acquisition angles on signal detection.平面内数字乳腺断层合成图像中人类观察者的性能:重建滤波器和数据采集角度对信号检测的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229915. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging.医学影像中观察者性能方法学的新进展。
Semin Nucl Med. 2011 Nov;41(6):401-18. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.07.001.
2
Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis.乳房内钙化和数字乳腺断层合成。
Breast J. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):638-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01152.x. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
3
What is the lifetime risk of developing cancer?: the effect of adjusting for multiple primaries.一生中罹患癌症的风险是多少?:调整多重原发性癌症的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 26;105(3):460-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.250. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
4
The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.在一项自由反应观察者性能研究中,双视角数字乳腺摄影、单视角乳腺断层合成以及乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺摄影的双视角组合的诊断准确性。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):113-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq044. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
5
VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.VIEWDEX:一款用于观察者性能研究的高效且易于使用的软件。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):42-51. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq057. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
6
Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.乳腺断层合成术:与数字乳腺摄影术和超声检查相比,肿瘤测量的准确性。
Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):240-7. doi: 10.3109/02841850903524447.
7
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.数字乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺钼靶摄影:一项临床性能研究。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):1545-53. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1699-5. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
8
Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results.乳腺断层合成在临床实践中的初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):16-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1523-2. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
9
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.数字乳腺断层合成:观察者性能研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):586-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2031.
10
Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.乳腺断层合成三维线性系统模型的实验验证
Med Phys. 2009 Jan;36(1):240-51. doi: 10.1118/1.3040178.

乳腺断层合成摄影术与数字乳腺钼靶摄影:诊断准确性比较。

Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.

机构信息

Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1074-82. doi: 10.1259/bjr/53282892. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1259/bjr/53282892
PMID:22674710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3500806/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the ability of radiologists to detect breast cancers using one-view breast tomosynthesis (BT) and two-view digital mammography (DM) in an enriched population of diseased patients and benign and/or healthy patients.

METHODS

All participants gave informed consent. The BT and DM examinations were performed with about the same average glandular dose to the breast. The study population comprised patients with subtle signs of malignancy seen on DM and/or ultrasonography. Ground truth was established by pathology, needle biopsy and/or by 1-year follow-up by mammography, which retrospectively resulted in 89 diseased breasts (1 breast per patient) with 95 malignant lesions and 96 healthy or benign breasts. Two experienced radiologists, who were not participants in the study, determined the locations of the malignant lesions. Five radiologists, experienced in mammography, interpreted the cases independently in a free-response study. The data were analysed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) methods, regarding both readers and cases as random effects.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of BT was significantly better than that of DM (JAFROC: p=0.0031, ROC: p=0.0415). The average sensitivity of BT was higher than that of DM (∼90% vs ∼79%; 95% confidence interval of difference: 0.036, 0.108) while the average false-positive fraction was not significantly different (95% confidence interval of difference: -0.117, 0.010).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of BT was superior to DM in an enriched population.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较在患有疾病的患者以及良性和/或健康患者的丰富人群中,使用单视图乳腺断层合成术(BT)和双视图数字乳腺成像(DM)检测乳腺癌的放射科医生的能力。

方法

所有参与者均给予知情同意。BT 和 DM 检查的乳房腺体平均剂量大致相同。研究人群包括在 DM 和/或超声检查中出现恶性肿瘤可疑迹象的患者。通过病理、针吸活检和/或 1 年的乳腺钼靶随访建立了金标准,回顾性地确定了 89 例患病乳房(每位患者 1 例),其中 95 例为恶性病变,96 例为健康或良性乳房。2 名经验丰富的放射科医生(未参与本研究)确定了恶性病变的位置。5 名经验丰富的乳腺钼靶放射科医生独立进行了自由响应研究。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)和刀切替代自由响应 ROC(JAFROC)方法对数据进行分析,将读者和病例视为随机效应。

结果

BT 的诊断准确性明显优于 DM(JAFROC:p=0.0031,ROC:p=0.0415)。BT 的平均敏感度高于 DM(约 90%比约 79%;差异 95%置信区间:0.036,0.108),而平均假阳性率差异无统计学意义(差异 95%置信区间:-0.117,0.010)。

结论

在丰富的人群中,BT 的诊断准确性优于 DM。