Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248, Paris Cedex 05, France.
Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2863-5. Epub 2013 May 15.
To compare the diagnostic performance of single-view breast tomosynthesis (BT) with that of dual-view mammography (MX); to assess the benefit of adding the craniocaudal (CC) mammographic view to BT, and of adding BT to MX plus breast ultrasound, considered to be the reference work-up.
One hundred and fifty-five consenting patients with unresolved mammographic and/or ultrasound findings or breast symptoms underwent conventional work-up plus mediolateral oblique-view BT of the affected breast. The final study set in 130 patients resulted in 55 malignant and 76 benign and normal cases. Seven breast radiologists rated the cases through five sequential techniques using a BIRADS-based scale: MX, MX + ultrasound, MX + ultrasound + BT, BT, BT + MX(CC). Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and performance of the techniques was assessed from the areas under ROC curves. The performance of BT and of BT + MX(CC) was tested versus MX; the performance of MX + ultrasound + BT tested versus MX + ultrasound.
Tomosynthesis was found to be non-inferior to mammography. BT + MX(CC) did not appear to be superior to MX, and MX + ultrasound + BT not superior to MX + ultrasound.
Overall, none of the five techniques tested outperformed the others. Further clinical studies are needed to clarify the role of BT as a substitute for traditional work-up in the diagnostic environment.
• Digital breast tomosynthesis is a new adjunct to mammography and breast ultrasound. • We compared the diagnostic performance of these investigations in an experimental observer study. • Single-view breast tomosynthesis was confirmed as non-inferior to dual-view mammography. • None of the investigations (or combinations) tested outperformed the others. • Further prospective studies are needed to clarify precise role of tomosynthesis for diagnostic application.
比较单视图乳腺断层合成(BT)与双视图乳腺摄影术(MX)的诊断性能;评估在 BT 中增加头尾位(CC)乳腺摄影的益处,以及在 MX 加乳腺超声中增加 BT 的益处,后者被认为是参考检查。
155 名同意的患者进行了常规检查,包括未解决的乳腺和/或超声检查结果或乳腺症状,并进行了受累乳房的侧斜位 BT。最终研究纳入了 130 名患者,其中 55 例为恶性,76 例为良性和正常。7 名乳腺放射科医生使用基于 BIRADS 的量表,通过五次连续技术对病例进行评分:MX、MX+超声、MX+超声+BT、BT、BT+MX(CC)。进行了多读者、多病例接收器操作特征(ROC)分析,并从 ROC 曲线下的面积评估了技术的性能。测试了 BT 和 BT+MX(CC)相对于 MX 的性能;测试了 MX+超声+BT 相对于 MX+超声的性能。
断层合成术被证明不劣于乳腺摄影术。BT+MX(CC)似乎并不优于 MX,而 MX+超声+BT 也不比 MX+超声优越。
总的来说,没有一种测试技术表现优于其他技术。需要进一步的临床研究来阐明 BT 在诊断环境中作为传统检查替代的作用。
•数字乳腺断层合成术是乳腺摄影术和乳腺超声的新辅助手段。•我们在一项实验性观察者研究中比较了这些检查的诊断性能。•单视图乳腺断层合成术被证实不劣于双视图乳腺摄影术。•没有一种检查(或组合)表现优于其他。•需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明断层合成术在诊断应用中的精确作用。