Suppr超能文献

简要报告:一项比较 DSM-IV-TR 下自闭症谱系障碍的诊断结果与 DSM-5 修订版的探索性研究。

Brief report: an exploratory study comparing diagnostic outcomes for autism spectrum disorders under DSM-IV-TR with the proposed DSM-5 revision.

机构信息

Diagnostic Assessment Service, Autism Spectrum Australia (Aspect), PO BOX 361, Forestville, NSW, 2087, Australia.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Aug;42(8):1750-6. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1560-6.

Abstract

The proposed revision for Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--Fifth Edition (DSM-5) represents a shift from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). As the proposed DSM-5 criteria require a higher minimum number of symptoms to be present compared to DSM-IV-TR, there have been some concerns about the impact that this will have on diagnostic outcomes. Therefore, the current study aimed to compare diagnostic outcomes using both DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria for 132 children. Of the 111 participants who received an ASD diagnosis under DSM-IV-TR, 26 did not meet DSM-5 criteria. The majority of these had received a DSM-IV-TR PDD-NOS diagnosis. Implications of the results and the proposed DSM-5 changes to the ASD criteria are discussed.

摘要

DSM-5 中自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的修订提案代表了从《精神障碍诊断与统计手册——第四版,文字修订版》(DSM-IV-TR)的转变。由于与 DSM-IV-TR 相比,DSM-5 提出的标准需要存在更高数量的症状,因此有人担心这会对诊断结果产生影响。因此,本研究旨在比较使用 DSM-IV-TR 和 DSM-5 标准对 132 名儿童进行诊断的结果。在 111 名根据 DSM-IV-TR 被诊断为 ASD 的参与者中,有 26 名不符合 DSM-5 标准。其中大多数人被诊断为 DSM-IV-TR PDD-NOS。讨论了结果的意义和 DSM-5 对 ASD 标准的修改建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验