Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Aug;63(3):440-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and other regulatory agencies around the world have registered glyphosate as a broad-spectrum herbicide for use on multiple food and non-food use crops. Glyphosate is widely considered by regulatory authorities and scientific bodies to have no carcinogenic potential, based primarily on results of carcinogenicity studies of rats and mice. To examine potential cancer risks in humans, we reviewed the epidemiologic literature to evaluate whether exposure to glyphosate is associated causally with cancer risk in humans. We also reviewed relevant methodological and biomonitoring studies of glyphosate. Seven cohort studies and fourteen case-control studies examined the association between glyphosate and one or more cancer outcomes. Our review found no consistent pattern of positive associations indicating a causal relationship between total cancer (in adults or children) or any site-specific cancer and exposure to glyphosate. Data from biomonitoring studies underscore the importance of exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies, and indicate that studies should incorporate not only duration and frequency of pesticide use, but also type of pesticide formulation. Because generic exposure assessments likely lead to exposure misclassification, it is recommended that exposure algorithms be validated with biomonitoring data.
美国环境保护署和世界其他监管机构已将草甘膦注册为广谱除草剂,可用于多种粮食作物和非粮食作物。监管机构和科学机构主要基于对大鼠和小鼠致癌性研究的结果,普遍认为草甘膦没有致癌潜力。为了研究人类潜在的癌症风险,我们审查了流行病学文献,以评估接触草甘膦是否与人类癌症风险有因果关系。我们还审查了相关的草甘膦方法学和生物监测研究。七项队列研究和十四项病例对照研究检查了草甘膦与一种或多种癌症结果之间的关联。我们的审查没有发现一致的阳性关联模式,表明总癌症(成人或儿童)或任何特定部位癌症与接触草甘膦之间存在因果关系。生物监测研究的数据强调了暴露评估在流行病学研究中的重要性,并表明研究不仅应包括农药使用的持续时间和频率,还应包括农药制剂的类型。由于通用暴露评估可能导致暴露分类错误,因此建议使用生物监测数据验证暴露算法。