Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75206, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;80(4):624-35. doi: 10.1037/a0028957. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Identifying mediators of therapeutic change is important to the development of interventions and augmentation strategies. Threat reappraisal is considered a key mediator underlying the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders. The present study systematically reviewed the evidence for the threat reappraisal mediation hypothesis.
In our review, we included studies that (a) investigated the threat reappraisal mediation hypothesis; (b) included adults with an anxiety disorder diagnosis; (c) used a longitudinal design; and (d) did not report on previously published findings (to avoid the inclusion of multiple reports of the same data). After data extraction, we made review-specific quality judgments for each study using the following a priori criteria informed by mediation theory: (a) demonstrated statistical mediation; (b) demonstrated that CBT caused threat reappraisal; (c) demonstrated that threat reappraisal caused anxiety reduction; and (d) demonstrated specificity of the threat reappraisal-anxiety reduction relation.
Of the 2,296 studies we identified, 25 met inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 56% tested and 52% established statistical mediation, 52% tested and 28% established CBT as a cause of threat reappraisal, 28% tested and 24% established threat reappraisal as a cause of anxiety reduction, and 44% tested and 36% established specificity of the threat reappraisal-anxiety reduction relation.
While threat reappraisal is related to anxiety symptom improvement with CBT, there are few extant studies that meet most of the criteria necessary to conclusively demonstrate that it causes symptom improvement in CBT and that it is not a proxy for other third variables. Recommendations for future research in this area are discussed.
识别治疗变化的中介因素对于干预措施和增强策略的发展非常重要。威胁重新评估被认为是认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗焦虑障碍效果的关键中介因素。本研究系统地回顾了威胁重新评估中介假说的证据。
在我们的综述中,我们纳入了以下研究:(a)调查威胁重新评估中介假说;(b)纳入有焦虑障碍诊断的成年人;(c)使用纵向设计;(d)不报告先前发表的发现(以避免包含同一数据的多个报告)。在数据提取后,我们使用中介理论预先确定的标准(a)显示统计中介;(b)表明 CBT 引起威胁重新评估;(c)表明威胁重新评估引起焦虑减轻;以及(d)表明威胁重新评估与焦虑减轻之间关系的特异性,对每项研究进行了特定于综述的质量判断。
在我们确定的 2296 项研究中,有 25 项符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,56%的研究测试并建立了统计中介,52%的研究测试并建立了 CBT 是威胁重新评估的原因,28%的研究测试并建立了威胁重新评估是焦虑减轻的原因,44%的研究测试并建立了威胁重新评估与焦虑减轻之间关系的特异性。
虽然威胁重新评估与 CBT 治疗中的焦虑症状改善有关,但很少有研究符合证明它是 CBT 中引起症状改善的必要标准,并且它不是其他第三个变量的替代物。讨论了该领域未来研究的建议。