Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Science, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012 Jun;227(2):97-104. doi: 10.1620/tjem.227.97.
The concept of "patient enablement" involves patients' perceptions of ability to understand and cope with illness. Improving enablement is an important goal of medical consultations for patients with chronic illness. To measure "enablement," a post-medical-consultation patient-reported questionnaire was developed and named "Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI)" in the United Kingdom. Unfortunately, there has been no tool to evaluate patient enablement in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to develop PEI Japanese version, to examine its validity and reliability, and to clarify the constitution of concept about patient enablement among Japanese patients. The translation process included forward translation, expert panel back-translation, following the standard WHO process. Participants were 256 individuals (157 men and 99 women; mean age 62.9 ± 11.8 years) receiving a regular outpatient treatment due to chronic illness at the Department of Cardiology, Respiratory, or Endocrinology and Metabolism in a regional hospital. To assess validity, we compared PEI with Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) by correlation coefficient, which was 0.55 (P < 0.01). Furthermore, factor analysis indicated that PEI had two principal factors labeled "coping with illness and health maintenance" and "confidence in oneself and independence". For an evaluation of reliability, internal consistency was calculated (Cronbach's alpha = 0.875). In conclusion, two principal factors comprise patient enablement measured by PEI with satisfactory validity and reliability. PEI Japanese version will be a useful tool to evaluate and improve medical consultations in Japan.
“患者赋权”的概念涉及患者对理解和应对疾病能力的感知。提高赋权是慢性病患者医疗咨询的重要目标。为了衡量“赋权”,开发了一种基于患者报告的医疗咨询后问卷,并在英国将其命名为“患者赋权工具(PEI)”。不幸的是,日本还没有评估患者赋权的工具。因此,本研究旨在开发 PEI 日文版,检验其有效性和可靠性,并阐明日本患者对患者赋权概念的构成。翻译过程包括正向翻译、专家小组回译,遵循世界卫生组织的标准。参与者为 256 名(男性 157 名,女性 99 名;平均年龄 62.9±11.8 岁)在一家地区医院心内科、呼吸科或内分泌和代谢科接受慢性病常规门诊治疗的患者。为了评估有效性,我们通过相关系数比较了 PEI 与医疗访谈满意度量表(MISS)的相关性,其相关系数为 0.55(P<0.01)。此外,因子分析表明,PEI 有两个主要因素,分别命名为“应对疾病和保持健康”和“对自己和独立性的信心”。为了评估可靠性,计算了内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.875)。总之,PEI 测量的患者赋权由两个主要因素组成,具有令人满意的有效性和可靠性。PEI 日文版将成为评估和改善日本医疗咨询的有用工具。