• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多文化 Delirium Rating Scale--Revised-98 数据汇总分析亚综合征谵妄的表型。

Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale--Revised-98 data.

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2012 Jul;73(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.010
PMID:22691554
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus definition for the phenotype of subsyndromal delirium (SSD), a subthreshold state to full delirium. Without an a priori definition we applied advanced analytic techniques to discern SSD.

METHOD

We pooled Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) data from 859 DSM-IV diagnosed nondemented delirious adults and nondelirious controls collected by investigators in 7 countries. Discriminant analyses defined an SSD group that was then compared to Nondelirium and Delirium groups.

RESULTS

SSD (n=138) had intermediate DRS-R98 item severities between Delirium (n=497) and Nondelirium (n=224) groups, where groups significantly differed on all DRS-R98 items (ANOVA p<.001) except delusions. Discriminant analysis found SSD phenomenologically closer to Delirium than Nondelirium. Using full multinomial logistical regression, SSD was distinguished from Nondelirium by temporal onset, sleep-wake cycle, perceptual disturbances, motor retardation, delusion, affective lability, and all cognitive items; SSD was similar to Delirium in thought process, language, motor agitation or retardation, sleep-wake cycle, all cognitive items, fluctuation and physical disorder. The multivariate model correctly classified 94.2% of Nondelirium, 75.4% of SSD and 97.2% of Delirium subjects. Binary logistic regression of six core domain symptoms (sleep-wake cycle, thought process, language, attention, orientation, and visuospatial ability) together were found as highly differentiating of SSD from Nondelirium, which correctly classified almost 80% of SDD.

CONCLUSIONS

SSD is intermediate in severity between nondelirious controls and full syndromal delirium, but its phenotype is more like delirium. Core domain delirium symptoms present at milder severity in SSD should be evaluated further for utility in detecting and managing SSD, preventing delirium, and possible inclusion in DSM-V.

摘要

目的

亚综合征谵妄(SSD)是谵妄的亚阈值状态,但其表型尚无共识定义。由于缺乏先验定义,我们应用了先进的分析技术来识别 SSD。

方法

我们汇集了来自 7 个国家的 859 名 DSM-IV 诊断为非痴呆性谵妄成人和非谵妄对照者的 Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98(DRS-R98)数据。判别分析定义了一个 SSD 组,然后将其与非谵妄组和谵妄组进行比较。

结果

SSD(n=138)在 DRS-R98 项目严重程度上介于谵妄组(n=497)和非谵妄组(n=224)之间,所有组在 DRS-R98 所有项目上差异均有统计学意义(ANOVA p<.001),除妄想外。判别分析发现 SSD 的表型更接近谵妄而非非谵妄。使用完全多项逻辑回归,SSD 可通过发病时间、睡眠-觉醒周期、知觉障碍、运动迟缓、妄想、情感不稳定和所有认知项目与非谵妄区分;SSD 在思维过程、语言、运动激动或迟缓、睡眠-觉醒周期、所有认知项目、波动性和躯体障碍方面与谵妄相似。多元模型正确分类了 94.2%的非谵妄者、75.4%的 SSD 者和 97.2%的谵妄者。对睡眠-觉醒周期、思维过程、语言、注意力、定向和视空间能力等六个核心域症状的二元逻辑回归发现,它们可以很好地区分 SSD 与非谵妄,对 SSD 的正确分类率接近 80%。

结论

SSD 在严重程度上介于非谵妄对照者和完全综合征性谵妄之间,但表型更像谵妄。在 SSD 中以较轻严重程度出现的核心域谵妄症状应进一步评估其在检测和管理 SSD、预防谵妄和可能纳入 DSM-V 中的作用。

相似文献

1
Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale--Revised-98 data.使用多文化 Delirium Rating Scale--Revised-98 数据汇总分析亚综合征谵妄的表型。
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Jul;73(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 May 30.
2
Three core domains of delirium validated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.采用探索性和验证性因子分析验证了谵妄的三个核心领域。
Psychosomatics. 2013 May-Jun;54(3):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
3
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 (DRS-R98).《谵妄评定量表修订版98(DRS-R98)的验证性因素分析》
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015;27(2):e122-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13110345. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
4
A longitudinal study of motor subtypes in delirium: relationship with other phenomenology, etiology, medication exposure and prognosis.一项关于谵妄中运动亚型的纵向研究:与其他表现、病因、药物暴露和预后的关系。
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Dec;71(6):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
5
Subsyndromal delirium compared with delirium, dementia, and subjects without delirium or dementia in elderly general hospital admissions and nursing home residents.老年综合医院住院患者和养老院居民中,与谵妄、痴呆以及无谵妄或痴呆的受试者相比,亚综合征性谵妄的情况。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 1;7:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017.
6
Symptoms of delirium: an exploratory factor analytic study among referred patients.谵妄症状:转诊患者的探索性因子分析研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
Subsyndromal delirium in the intensive care setting: Phenomenological characteristics and discrimination of subsyndromal delirium versus no and full-syndromal delirium.重症监护环境下的亚综合征谵妄:亚综合征谵妄与无和全综合征谵妄的现象学特征和鉴别。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000104. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Replication analysis for composition of the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS) in a referral cohort from Northern India.对来自印度北部转诊队列的 Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS) 组成进行复制分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Mar 30;206(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.08.034. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
9
Reliability of delirium rating scale (DRS) and delirium rating scale-revised-98 (DRS-R98) using variance-based multivariate modelling.基于方差的多变量建模评估意识错乱评定量表(DRS)和修订版意识错乱评定量表(DRS-R98)的可靠性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jul;47(7):966-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
10
Features of subsyndromal and persistent delirium.亚综合征和持续性谵妄的特征。
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;200(1):37-44. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095273. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional in intensive care units.重症监护病房中谵妄诊断工具临时版的验证
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43212. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043212.
2
Incidence and influencing factors of subsyndromal delirium in elderly patients with pancreatic surgery: a prospective study.老年胰腺手术患者亚综合征谵妄的发生率及影响因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 23;16:1461707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1461707. eCollection 2025.
3
Delirium in psychiatric settings: risk factors and assessment tools in patients with psychiatric illness: a scoping review.
精神科环境中的谵妄:精神疾病患者的危险因素及评估工具:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 8;23(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02121-6.
4
The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting.修订版谵妄评定量表(DRS-R98)在重症监护环境中用于谵妄严重程度评估的有效性和适用性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Mar;39(3):240-249. doi: 10.1177/08850666231199986. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
Advancing specificity in delirium: The delirium subtyping initiative.推进谵妄的特异性:谵妄亚型倡议。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jan;20(1):183-194. doi: 10.1002/alz.13419. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
6
Data-driven categorization of postoperative delirium symptoms using unsupervised machine learning.使用无监督机器学习对术后谵妄症状进行数据驱动的分类。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 27;14:1205605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1205605. eCollection 2023.
7
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of ICU nurses regarding subsyndromal delirium among 20 hospitals in China: a descriptive cross-sectional survey.中国 20 家医院 ICU 护士对亚综合征性谵妄的知识、态度和实践:描述性横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e063821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063821.
8
Incidence and risk factors of subsyndromal delirium after curative resection of gastric cancer.胃癌根治术后亚综合征性谵妄的发生率及危险因素。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4681-2.
9
Subsyndromal Delirium and Institutionalization Among Patients With Critical Illness.危重症患者的亚综合征谵妄与机构化照料
Am J Crit Care. 2017 Nov;26(6):447-455. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017263.
10
Subsyndromal delirium compared with delirium, dementia, and subjects without delirium or dementia in elderly general hospital admissions and nursing home residents.老年综合医院住院患者和养老院居民中,与谵妄、痴呆以及无谵妄或痴呆的受试者相比,亚综合征性谵妄的情况。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 1;7:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017.