Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Jul;73(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 May 30.
There is no consensus definition for the phenotype of subsyndromal delirium (SSD), a subthreshold state to full delirium. Without an a priori definition we applied advanced analytic techniques to discern SSD.
We pooled Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) data from 859 DSM-IV diagnosed nondemented delirious adults and nondelirious controls collected by investigators in 7 countries. Discriminant analyses defined an SSD group that was then compared to Nondelirium and Delirium groups.
SSD (n=138) had intermediate DRS-R98 item severities between Delirium (n=497) and Nondelirium (n=224) groups, where groups significantly differed on all DRS-R98 items (ANOVA p<.001) except delusions. Discriminant analysis found SSD phenomenologically closer to Delirium than Nondelirium. Using full multinomial logistical regression, SSD was distinguished from Nondelirium by temporal onset, sleep-wake cycle, perceptual disturbances, motor retardation, delusion, affective lability, and all cognitive items; SSD was similar to Delirium in thought process, language, motor agitation or retardation, sleep-wake cycle, all cognitive items, fluctuation and physical disorder. The multivariate model correctly classified 94.2% of Nondelirium, 75.4% of SSD and 97.2% of Delirium subjects. Binary logistic regression of six core domain symptoms (sleep-wake cycle, thought process, language, attention, orientation, and visuospatial ability) together were found as highly differentiating of SSD from Nondelirium, which correctly classified almost 80% of SDD.
SSD is intermediate in severity between nondelirious controls and full syndromal delirium, but its phenotype is more like delirium. Core domain delirium symptoms present at milder severity in SSD should be evaluated further for utility in detecting and managing SSD, preventing delirium, and possible inclusion in DSM-V.
亚综合征谵妄(SSD)是谵妄的亚阈值状态,但其表型尚无共识定义。由于缺乏先验定义,我们应用了先进的分析技术来识别 SSD。
我们汇集了来自 7 个国家的 859 名 DSM-IV 诊断为非痴呆性谵妄成人和非谵妄对照者的 Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98(DRS-R98)数据。判别分析定义了一个 SSD 组,然后将其与非谵妄组和谵妄组进行比较。
SSD(n=138)在 DRS-R98 项目严重程度上介于谵妄组(n=497)和非谵妄组(n=224)之间,所有组在 DRS-R98 所有项目上差异均有统计学意义(ANOVA p<.001),除妄想外。判别分析发现 SSD 的表型更接近谵妄而非非谵妄。使用完全多项逻辑回归,SSD 可通过发病时间、睡眠-觉醒周期、知觉障碍、运动迟缓、妄想、情感不稳定和所有认知项目与非谵妄区分;SSD 在思维过程、语言、运动激动或迟缓、睡眠-觉醒周期、所有认知项目、波动性和躯体障碍方面与谵妄相似。多元模型正确分类了 94.2%的非谵妄者、75.4%的 SSD 者和 97.2%的谵妄者。对睡眠-觉醒周期、思维过程、语言、注意力、定向和视空间能力等六个核心域症状的二元逻辑回归发现,它们可以很好地区分 SSD 与非谵妄,对 SSD 的正确分类率接近 80%。
SSD 在严重程度上介于非谵妄对照者和完全综合征性谵妄之间,但表型更像谵妄。在 SSD 中以较轻严重程度出现的核心域谵妄症状应进一步评估其在检测和管理 SSD、预防谵妄和可能纳入 DSM-V 中的作用。