• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任何工作场所都应豁免于无烟法律吗:爱尔兰的经验。

Should any workplace be exempt from smoke-free law: the Irish experience.

机构信息

School of Physics, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Ireland.

出版信息

J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:545483. doi: 10.1155/2012/545483. Epub 2012 May 24.

DOI:10.1155/2012/545483
PMID:22693522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3368201/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2004, the Irish Government introduced national legislation banning smoking in workplaces; with exemptions for "a place of residence". This paper summarises three Irish studies of exempted premises; prisons, psychiatric hospitals and nursing homes.

METHODS

PM(2.5) and nicotine were measured in nursing homes and psychiatric hospitals, in addition to ultrafine particles in the hospitals. In the prisons, officers (n = 30) completed exhaled breath Carbon Monoxide (CO) measurements. Questionnaires determined officers' opinion on introducing smoking prohibitions in prisons. Nursing home smoking policies were examined and questionnaires completed by staff regarding workplace secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure.

FINDINGS

Ultrafine particle concentrations in psychiatric hospitals averaged 130,000  cm(3), approximately 45% higher than Dublin pub (35.5 μg/m(3)) pre ban. PM(2.5) levels in psychiatric hospitals (39.5 μg/m(3)) were similar to Dublin pubs (35.5 μg/m(3)) pre ban. In nursing homes permitting smoking, similar PM(2.5) levels (33 μg/m(3)) were measured, with nicotine levels (0.57 μg/m(3)) four times higher than "non-smoking" nursing homes (0.13 μg/m(3)). In prisons, 44% of non-smoking officers exhibited exhaled breath CO criteria for light to heavy smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

With SHS exposure levels in some exempted workplaces similar to Dublin pubs levels pre ban, policies ensuring full protection must be developed and implemented as a right for workers, inmates and patients.

摘要

背景

2004 年,爱尔兰政府颁布了全国性立法,禁止在工作场所吸烟;但“居住场所”除外。本文总结了对爱尔兰的三家豁免场所(监狱、精神病院和疗养院)进行的研究。

方法

除了测量医院的超细颗粒外,还在疗养院和精神病院中测量了 PM(2.5)和尼古丁。在监狱中,对 30 名工作人员进行了呼气一氧化碳(CO)测量。调查问卷确定了工作人员对在监狱中引入禁烟令的看法。检查了疗养院的吸烟政策,并由工作人员填写了有关工作场所二手烟(SHS)暴露的问卷。

结果

精神病院的超细颗粒浓度平均为 130000 cm³,比禁售前都柏林酒吧(35.5 μg/m³)高约 45%。精神病院的 PM(2.5)水平(39.5 μg/m³)与禁售前都柏林酒吧(35.5 μg/m³)相似。在允许吸烟的疗养院,测量到相似的 PM(2.5)水平(33 μg/m³),而尼古丁水平(0.57 μg/m³)是“非吸烟”疗养院的四倍(0.13 μg/m³)。在监狱中,44%的非吸烟人员呼出的 CO 符合轻至重度吸烟者的标准。

结论

由于一些豁免工作场所的 SHS 暴露水平与禁售前都柏林酒吧的水平相似,因此必须制定和实施确保全面保护的政策,作为工作人员、囚犯和病人的一项权利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/6149b17fdcf0/JEPH2012-545483.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/d6085653bea3/JEPH2012-545483.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/f72e1f120e58/JEPH2012-545483.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/0d3e8089f1f5/JEPH2012-545483.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/266dac9620ce/JEPH2012-545483.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/b60e37dcf900/JEPH2012-545483.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/bbcee835602a/JEPH2012-545483.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/6149b17fdcf0/JEPH2012-545483.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/d6085653bea3/JEPH2012-545483.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/f72e1f120e58/JEPH2012-545483.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/0d3e8089f1f5/JEPH2012-545483.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/266dac9620ce/JEPH2012-545483.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/b60e37dcf900/JEPH2012-545483.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/bbcee835602a/JEPH2012-545483.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e5/3368201/6149b17fdcf0/JEPH2012-545483.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Should any workplace be exempt from smoke-free law: the Irish experience.任何工作场所都应豁免于无烟法律吗:爱尔兰的经验。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:545483. doi: 10.1155/2012/545483. Epub 2012 May 24.
2
Lung function and exposure to workplace second-hand smoke during exemptions from smoking ban legislation: an exposure-response relationship based on indoor PM2.5 and urinary cotinine levels.在禁烟立法豁免期间,肺功能与工作场所二手烟暴露:基于室内 PM2.5 和尿可替宁水平的暴露-反应关系。
Thorax. 2011 Jul;66(7):615-23. doi: 10.1136/thx.2011.160291. Epub 2011 May 6.
3
Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs.爱尔兰禁烟令对都柏林酒吧工作人员呼吸健康及酒吧空气质量的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 15;175(8):840-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1085OC. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
4
Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places.智利圣地亚哥酒吧和餐馆的二手烟草烟雾:公共场所部分禁烟立法评估。
Tob Control. 2010 Dec;19(6):469-74. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.035402. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
5
Indoor air quality in prisons before and after implementation of a smoking ban law.实施禁烟法前后监狱内的空气质量
Tob Control. 2008 Apr;17(2):123-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.022038. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
6
Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban.波士顿酒吧禁烟前后的空气污染情况。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 27;6:266. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-266.
7
Exposure to tobacco smoke before and after a partial smoking ban in prison: indoor air quality measures.监狱部分禁烟前后接触烟草烟雾:室内空气质量措施。
Tob Control. 2012 Sep;21(5):488-91. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.043356. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
Evaluation of a smoke-free law on indoor air quality and on workers' health in Portuguese restaurants.葡萄牙餐厅无烟法对室内空气质量及员工健康的评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(4):201-9. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.852279.
9
Unexpected increase in indoor pollutants after the introduction of a smoke-free policy in a correctional center.在惩教中心实施禁烟政策后,室内污染物意外增加。
Indoor Air. 2016 Aug;26(4):623-33. doi: 10.1111/ina.12238. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Characterising the Exposure of Prison Staff to Second-Hand Tobacco Smoke.描述监狱工作人员接触二手烟草烟雾的情况。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Aug 1;61(7):809-821. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx058.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners.监狱禁烟令意见的预测因素:对苏格兰工作人员和囚犯调查数据的分析
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Jun 4;17:47. doi: 10.18332/tid/109559. eCollection 2019.
2
Smoking in Correctional Settings Worldwide: Prevalence, Bans, and Interventions.全球惩教场所吸烟状况:流行率、禁烟令和干预措施。
Epidemiol Rev. 2018 Jun 1;40(1):82-95. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxy005.
3
UK news media representations of smoking, smoking policies and tobacco bans in prisons.英国新闻媒体对监狱中的吸烟、禁烟政策和烟草禁令的报道。

本文引用的文献

1
Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and health effects among hospitality workers in Sweden--before and after the implementation of a smoke-free law.瑞典无烟法律实施前后酒店工作人员接触环境烟草烟雾的情况及其健康影响
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008 Aug;34(4):267-77. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1243. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
2
Should smoking be banned in prisons?监狱里应该禁止吸烟吗?
Tob Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):291-3. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021600.
3
Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs.
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):622-630. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053868. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Impact of institutional smoking bans on reducing harms and secondhand smoke exposure.机构禁烟对减少危害及二手烟暴露的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 27;2016(5):CD011856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011856.pub2.
5
The importance of continued engagement during the implementation phase of tobacco control policies in a middle-income country: the case of Costa Rica.在一个中等收入国家实施烟草控制政策的过程中持续参与的重要性:以哥斯达黎加为例。
Tob Control. 2017 Jan;26(1):60-68. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052701. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
An international smoking ban-how many lives will be saved?国际禁烟令——能挽救多少生命?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Jun;16(6):418. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0418-0.
爱尔兰禁烟令对都柏林酒吧工作人员呼吸健康及酒吧空气质量的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 15;175(8):840-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1085OC. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
4
Airborne exposure and biological monitoring of bar and restaurant workers before and after the introduction of a smoking ban.实施禁烟令前后酒吧和餐厅工作人员的空气暴露及生物监测
J Environ Monit. 2006 Mar;8(3):362-8. doi: 10.1039/b600050a. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
5
Secondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and air nicotine levels in bars.爱尔兰禁烟令后的二手烟暴露与风险:对酒店工作人员唾液可替宁浓度及酒吧空气中尼古丁水平的评估
Tob Control. 2005 Dec;14(6):384-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011635.
6
Characterization of indoor sources of fine and ultrafine particles: a study conducted in a full-scale chamber.室内细颗粒物和超细颗粒物源的特征:在全尺寸试验舱中进行的一项研究。
Indoor Air. 2005 Apr;15(2):141-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00332.x.