• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中期逆转学习:鸽子为何会预期和坚持?

Midsession reversal learning: why do pigeons anticipate and perseverate?

作者信息

Stagner Jessica P, Michler Daniel M, Rayburn-Reeves Rebecca M, Laude Jennifer R, Zentall Thomas R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):54-60. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0077-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13420-012-0077-3
PMID:22696201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3524370/
Abstract

Past research has shown that when given a simultaneous visual-discrimination midsession reversal task, pigeons typically anticipate the reversal well before it occurs and perseverate after it occurs. It appears that they use the estimation of time (or trial number) into the session, rather than (or in addition to) the more reliable cue, the outcome from the previous trial (i.e., a win-stay/lose-shift response rule), to determine which stimulus they should choose. In the present research, we investigated several variables that we thought might encourage pigeons to use a more efficient response strategy. In Experiment 1, we used a treadle-stepping response, rather than key pecking, to test the hypothesis that reflexive key pecking may have biased pigeons to estimate the time (or trial number) into the session at which the reversal would occur. In Experiment 2, we attempted to make the point of reversal in the session more salient by inserting irrelevant trials with stimuli different from the original discriminative stimuli, and for a separate group, we added a 5-s time-out penalty following incorrect choices. The use of a treadle-stepping response did not improve reversal performance, and although we found some improvement in reversal performance when the reversal was signaled and when errors resulted in a time-out, we found little evidence for performance that approached the win-stay/lose-shift accuracy shown by rats.

摘要

过去的研究表明,当鸽子接受同时进行的视觉辨别中期逆转任务时,它们通常会在逆转发生之前很久就预见到逆转,并在逆转发生后持续这种行为。似乎它们是利用对实验进程中的时间(或试验次数)的估计,而不是(或者除了)更可靠的线索——前一次试验的结果(即赢则继续/输则转换的反应规则),来决定应该选择哪个刺激。在本研究中,我们调查了几个我们认为可能会促使鸽子采用更有效反应策略的变量。在实验1中,我们使用踏板踩踏反应,而不是啄键反应,来检验这样一个假设,即反射性啄键可能使鸽子倾向于估计实验进程中逆转会发生的时间(或试验次数)。在实验2中,我们通过插入与原始辨别刺激不同的无关刺激试验,试图使实验中的逆转点更加突出,并且对于另一组,我们在错误选择后增加了5秒的暂停惩罚。使用踏板踩踏反应并没有提高逆转表现,虽然当逆转有信号提示以及错误导致暂停时,我们发现逆转表现有一些改善,但我们几乎没有发现鸽子的表现能达到大鼠所表现出的赢则继续/输则转换的准确性的证据。

相似文献

1
Midsession reversal learning: why do pigeons anticipate and perseverate?中期逆转学习:鸽子为何会预期和坚持?
Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):54-60. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0077-3.
2
Rats' midsession reversal performance: the nature of the response.大鼠的中期逆转表现:反应的性质
Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):49-58. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0189-7.
3
The midsession reversal task: A theoretical analysis.中期反转任务:理论分析
Learn Behav. 2020 Jun;48(2):195-207. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00423-8.
4
The Midsession Reversal Task with Pigeons Does a Brief Delay Between Choice and Reinforcement Facilitate Reversal Learning?鸽子的中期反转任务 选择与强化之间的短暂延迟是否有助于反转学习?
Behav Processes. 2020 Aug;177:104150. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104150. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Reversal learning in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia): qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility.大鼠(褐家鼠)和鸽子(原鸽)的逆向学习:行为灵活性的质性差异
J Comp Psychol. 2013 May;127(2):202-11. doi: 10.1037/a0026311. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
6
Simultaneous discrimination reversal learning in pigeons and humans: anticipatory and perseverative errors.鸽子和人类的同时辨别逆转学习:预期性错误和固着性错误。
Learn Behav. 2011 May;39(2):125-37. doi: 10.3758/s13420-010-0011-5.
7
Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals.在具有短试验间隔的同时辨别、中期逆转任务中,鸽子表现出接近最优的赢则停留/输则转换行为。
Behav Processes. 2013 Jan;92:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
8
A three-stimulus midsession reversal task in pigeons with visual and spatial discriminative stimuli.一项针对鸽子的具有视觉和空间辨别刺激的三刺激中期逆转任务。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0808-2. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Giving time a chance in the midsession reversal task.在中途反转任务中给时间一个机会。
Learn Behav. 2024 Sep;52(3):236-248. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00606-z. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
10
Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.鸽子的中期逆转:视觉与空间辨别及试验间隔
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):40-6. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0122-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Deliberately making miskates: Behavioural consistency under win maximization and loss maximization conditions.刻意犯错:在收益最大化和损失最大化条件下的行为一致性。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2023 Dec 6;8(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41539-023-00206-6.
2
Kea (Nestor notabilis) show flexibility and individuality in within-session reversal learning tasks.黄眼企鹅(Nestor notabilis)在单次会话的反转学习任务中表现出灵活性和个体性。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1339-1351. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01524-1. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.针对利用型和剥削型对手,竞争决策速度和质量的可变性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82269-2.
4
Basic reversal-learning capacity in flies suggests rudiments of complex cognition.果蝇的基本反转学习能力表明了复杂认知的雏形。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181749. eCollection 2017.
5
Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time.无处不在,无所不包:时间的力量与普遍性。
Int J Comp Psychol. 2015;28.
6
Change in the relative contributions of habit and working memory facilitates serial reversal learning expertise in rhesus monkeys.习惯和工作记忆相对贡献的变化有助于恒河猴的序列反转学习专长。
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):485-497. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1076-8. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
Midsession shifts in reward probability and the control of behavioral variability.奖励概率的中期变化与行为变异性的控制
Learn Behav. 2016 Sep;44(3):270-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0211-8.
8
Rats' midsession reversal performance: the nature of the response.大鼠的中期逆转表现:反应的性质
Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):49-58. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0189-7.
9
Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.鸽子的中期逆转:视觉与空间辨别及试验间隔
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):40-6. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0122-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Reversal learning in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia): qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility.大鼠(褐家鼠)和鸽子(原鸽)的逆向学习:行为灵活性的质性差异
J Comp Psychol. 2013 May;127(2):202-11. doi: 10.1037/a0026311. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
2
Simultaneous discrimination reversal learning in pigeons and humans: anticipatory and perseverative errors.鸽子和人类的同时辨别逆转学习:预期性错误和固着性错误。
Learn Behav. 2011 May;39(2):125-37. doi: 10.3758/s13420-010-0011-5.
3
Temporal control of internal states in pigeons.鸽子内部状态的时间控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Dec;17(6):915-22. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.915.
4
The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.通过刺激相关且与反应无关的食物呈现来维持关键啄食行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):65-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-65.
5
Post-choice information processing by pigeons.鸽子的选择后信息处理
Anim Cogn. 2005 Oct;8(4):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0254-2. Epub 2005 Mar 3.
6
PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING.学习中的系统发育差异。
Am Psychol. 1965 Jun;20:396-410. doi: 10.1037/h0022328.
7
THE COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING.
Annu Rev Psychol. 1965;16:95-118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.16.020165.000523.
8
Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.鸽子啄键行为的自动形成
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1.