Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛患病率分析:人类发展指数低于 0.9 的国家:一项无荟萃分析的系统评价。

The prevalence of chronic pain with an analysis of countries with a Human Development Index less than 0.9: a systematic review without meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jul;28(7):1221-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.703132. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no systematic reviews of epidemiological studies of chronic pain in the developing world.

AIM

To estimate the prevalence of chronic pain worldwide paying particular attention to data from countries with a Human Development Index (HDI) of less than 0.9.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted for cross-sectional surveys of chronic pain (≥3 months) in the adult general population using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SportDiscus, Sciencedirect, CAS ILLUMINA, Academic search complete, PsycINFO and AMED. Forty-eight studies were identified and 29 of these were excluded because they surveyed children, the elderly or were longitudinal studies.

RESULTS

Weighted mean ± SD prevalence of chronic pain worldwide was 30.3% ± 11.7% (19 studies, 65 surveys, 34 countries, 182,019 respondents). There was no correlation between HDI and prevalence. In countries with a HDI < 0.9 prevalence was 33.9% ± 14.5% and significantly higher than prevalence in countries with a HDI of ≥0.9 (29.9% ± 12.7%), although removal of a large study that may have included a sample of individuals with comorbidities reduced the worldwide estimate to 28.0% ± 11.8% (47 surveys, 33 countries, 139,770 participants). Interestingly, the estimate of countries with a HDI < 0.9 to 24.8% ± 8.9% (7 surveys, 7 countries, 6122 participants) became significantly lower than the estimate of countries with a HDI ≥ 0.9 which was 28.1% ± 11.6% (40 surveys, 21 countries, 133,648 participants).

CONCLUSION

The review provides further evidence that the prevalence of chronic pain in the general population is high. However, there was insufficient reliable data to estimate with any certainty the prevalence of chronic pain in countries with an HDI < 0.9 with variability in estimates between surveys being of concern. Subtle differences in review and survey methodology appeared to impact markedly on estimates. There is a need for epidemiological studies that estimate the prevalence of chronic pain in developing countries to determine the scale of the problem.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,尚无针对发展中国家慢性疼痛的流行病学研究的系统评价。

目的

估算全球慢性疼痛的患病率,特别关注人类发展指数(HDI)低于 0.9 的国家的数据。

方法

使用 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、SportDiscus、Sciencedirect、CAS ILLUMINA、Academic search complete、PsycINFO 和 AMED 对成人一般人群中慢性疼痛(≥3 个月)的横断面调查进行文献检索。确定了 48 项研究,其中 29 项因调查儿童、老年人或为纵向研究而被排除在外。

结果

全球慢性疼痛的加权平均患病率为 30.3%±11.7%(19 项研究,65 项调查,34 个国家,182019 名受访者)。HDI 与患病率之间没有相关性。在人类发展指数<0.9 的国家,患病率为 33.9%±14.5%,明显高于人类发展指数≥0.9 的国家(29.9%±12.7%),尽管去除了一项可能包含合并症患者样本的大型研究,将全球估计值降低至 28.0%±11.8%(47 项调查,33 个国家,139770 名参与者)。有趣的是,人类发展指数<0.9 的国家的估计值为 24.8%±8.9%(7 项调查,7 个国家,6122 名参与者)明显低于人类发展指数≥0.9 的国家的估计值,为 28.1%±11.6%(40 项调查,21 个国家,133648 名参与者)。

结论

该综述进一步证明,一般人群中慢性疼痛的患病率很高。然而,由于调查之间的估计值存在很大的变异性,因此没有足够可靠的数据可以确定人类发展指数<0.9 的国家的慢性疼痛患病率。审查和调查方法学上的细微差异似乎对估计值产生了显著影响。需要进行流行病学研究来估计发展中国家慢性疼痛的患病率,以确定问题的严重程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验