• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年通用酒精滥用预防计划:Cochrane 系统评价。

Universal alcohol misuse prevention programmes for children and adolescents: Cochrane systematic reviews.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brooks University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Perspect Public Health. 2012 May;132(3):128-34. doi: 10.1177/1757913912443487.

DOI:10.1177/1757913912443487
PMID:22700577
Abstract

AIMS

Alcohol misuse by young people causes significant health and social harm, including death and disability. Therefore, prevention of youth alcohol misuse is a policy aim in many countries. Our aim was to examine the effectiveness of (1) school-based, (2) family-based and (3) multi-component universal alcohol misuse prevention programmes in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Three Cochrane systematic reviews were performed: searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Project CORK and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2010, including randomised trials evaluating universal alcohol misuse prevention programmes in school, family or multiple settings in youths aged 18 years or younger. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies and any discrepancies were resolved via discussion.

RESULTS

A total of 85 trials were included in the reviews of school (n = 53), family (n = 12) and multi-component (n = 20) programmes. Meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity. Most studies were conducted in North America. Risk of bias assessment revealed problems related to inappropriate unit of analysis, moderate to high attrition, selective outcome reporting and potential confounding. Certain generic psychosocial and life skills school-based programmes were effective in reducing alcohol use in youth. Most family-based programmes were effective. There was insufficient evidence to conclude that multiple interventions provided additional benefit over single interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In these Cochrane reviews, some school, family or multi-component prevention programmes were shown to be effective in reducing alcohol misuse in youths. However, these results warrant a cautious interpretation, since bias and/or contextual factors may have affected the trial results. Further research should replicate the most promising studies identified in these reviews and pay particular attention to content and context factors through rigorous evaluation.

摘要

目的

年轻人酗酒会导致严重的健康和社会危害,包括死亡和残疾。因此,预防青少年酗酒是许多国家的政策目标。我们的目的是检验(1)基于学校、(2)基于家庭和(3)多组分通用的青少年酗酒预防计划在儿童和青少年中的有效性。

方法

进行了三项 Cochrane 系统评价:截至 2010 年 7 月,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Project CORK 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记处进行了检索,包括评估在学校、家庭或多个环境中对 18 岁以下年轻人进行通用酗酒预防计划的随机试验。两名独立审查员确定了合格的研究,任何差异均通过讨论解决。

结果

共有 85 项试验被纳入学校(n = 53)、家庭(n = 12)和多组分(n = 20)计划的综述。由于研究异质性,未进行荟萃分析。大多数研究在北美进行。偏倚风险评估显示出与不适当的分析单位、中度至高度失访、选择性结果报告和潜在混杂有关的问题。某些通用的心理社会和生活技能学校计划在减少青少年饮酒方面是有效的。大多数基于家庭的计划是有效的。没有足够的证据可以得出结论,多种干预措施比单一干预措施提供额外的益处。

结论

在这些 Cochrane 综述中,一些基于学校、家庭或多组分的预防计划被证明可以有效减少青少年的酗酒行为。然而,由于偏倚和/或背景因素可能影响了试验结果,这些结果需要谨慎解释。进一步的研究应该复制这些综述中确定的最有希望的研究,并通过严格的评估特别注意内容和背景因素。

相似文献

1
Universal alcohol misuse prevention programmes for children and adolescents: Cochrane systematic reviews.儿童和青少年通用酒精滥用预防计划:Cochrane 系统评价。
Perspect Public Health. 2012 May;132(3):128-34. doi: 10.1177/1757913912443487.
2
Universal school-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people.针对青少年酒精滥用问题的普及性校内预防项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11(5):CD009113. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009113.
3
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
4
Universal multi-component prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people.针对年轻人酒精滥用问题的通用多成分预防项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD009307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009307.
5
The effectiveness of brief interventions in the clinical setting in reducing alcohol misuse and binge drinking in adolescents: a critical review of the literature.临床环境中简短干预对减少青少年酒精滥用和狂饮的效果:文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Mar;19(5-6):605-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03060.x.
6
Universal family-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people.针对年轻人酒精滥用问题的基于家庭的通用预防项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD009308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009308.
7
A computerized harm minimization prevention program for alcohol misuse and related harms: randomized controlled trial.一项针对酒精滥用及相关危害的计算机化危害最小化预防计划:随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2009 Apr;104(4):564-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02510.x.
8
Is universal prevention against youths' substance misuse really universal? Gender-specific effects in the EU-Dap school-based prevention trial.普遍预防青少年物质滥用真的普遍吗?基于学校的欧盟 Dap 预防试验中的性别特异性效应。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):722-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081513. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9
Effect of Middle School Interventions on Alcohol Misuse and Abuse in Mexican American High School Adolescents: Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.中学干预对墨西哥裔美国高中生酒精滥用的影响:一项随机临床试验的五年随访。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;75(5):429-437. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0058.
10
Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug misuse prevention and cessation programming for alternative high school youth: a review.针对替代高中学生的酒精、烟草及其他药物滥用预防与戒断项目:综述
J Sch Health. 2014 Nov;84(11):748-58. doi: 10.1111/josh.12200.

引用本文的文献

1
Social epidemiology of early adolescent alcohol expectancies.青少年早期酒精预期的社会流行病学。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):2502. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17434-5.
2
Digital interventions for substance use disorders in young people: rapid review.数字干预措施在青少年物质使用障碍中的应用:快速综述。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Feb 17;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00518-1.
3
Updated systematic review of Australian school-based prevention programmes for alcohol and other drugs: a review protocol.更新的澳大利亚基于学校的预防酒精和其他药物滥用的系统评价:综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 7;12(11):e059795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059795.
4
Individual-, family- and school-based interventions to prevent multiple risk behaviours relating to alcohol, tobacco and drug use in young people aged 8-25 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.个体、家庭和学校为基础的干预措施,以预防 8-25 岁青少年中与酒精、烟草和药物使用相关的多种风险行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):1111. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13072-5.
5
Outcomes and Mechanisms of Change of the Strengthening Families Program in a Clinical Sample of Children and Their Families in Austria.奥地利临床儿童及其家庭样本中强化家庭计划的结果和变化机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031074.
6
Distilling the curriculum: An analysis of alcohol industry-funded school-based youth education programmes.提炼课程:对基于学校的青年酒类教育项目的分析
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0259560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259560. eCollection 2022.
7
Do Alcohol Prevention Programs Influence Adolescents' Drinking Behaviors? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.酒精预防计划是否影响青少年的饮酒行为?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16):8524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168524.
8
The Efficacy of Primavera, a Prevention Programme on Alcohol and Tobacco Use among 10-12-Year-Old Schoolchildren: A Randomized Controlled Cluster Study.春田干预项目对 10-12 岁学龄儿童烟酒使用预防效果的随机对照群组研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083852.
9
Interventions for adolescent alcohol consumption in Africa: protocol for a scoping review including an overview of reviews.非洲青少年饮酒干预措施:包括系统评价概述的范围综述议定书。
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01642-4.
10
Strong and Deadly Futures: Co-Development of a Web-Based Wellbeing and Substance Use Prevention Program for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Aboriginal Adolescents.强大而致命的未来:为原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民及非原住民青少年共同开发基于网络的身心健康和药物使用预防计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 23;18(4):2176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042176.