Fliessbach Klaus, Phillipps Courtney B, Trautner Peter, Schnabel Marieke, Elger Christian E, Falk Armin, Weber Bernd
Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn Bonn, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 8;6:165. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00165. eCollection 2012.
In this paper we study neural responses to inequitable distributions of rewards despite equal performance. We specifically focus on differences between advantageous inequity (AI) and disadvantageous inequity (DI). AI and DI were realized in a hyperscanning functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment with pairs of subjects simultaneously performing a task in adjacent scanners and observing both subjects' rewards. Results showed (1) hypoactivation of the ventral striatum (VS) under DI but not under AI; (2) inequity induced activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) that was stronger under DI than under AI; (3) correlations between subjective evaluations of AI evaluation and bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal and left insular activity. Our study provides neurophysiological evidence for different cognitive processes that occur when exposed to DI and AI, respectively. One possible interpretation is that any form of inequity represents a norm violation, but that important differences between AI and DI emerge from an asymmetric involvement of status concerns.
在本文中,我们研究了尽管表现相同,但大脑对奖励不公平分配的神经反应。我们特别关注有利不公平(AI)和不利不公平(DI)之间的差异。AI和DI是在一项超扫描功能磁共振成像(fMRI)实验中实现的,实验中受试者成对,在相邻的扫描仪中同时执行一项任务,并观察两个受试者的奖励。结果显示:(1)DI情况下腹侧纹状体(VS)激活不足,而AI情况下则不然;(2)不公平诱导右侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)激活,DI情况下的激活比AI情况下更强;(3)AI评估的主观评价与双侧腹外侧前额叶和左侧岛叶活动之间存在相关性。我们的研究为分别接触DI和AI时发生的不同认知过程提供了神经生理学证据。一种可能的解释是,任何形式的不公平都代表着违反规范,但AI和DI之间的重要差异源于地位关注的不对称参与。