Thompson Paul B
Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Poiesis Prax. 2012 Jun;8(4):169-189. doi: 10.1007/s10202-012-0105-6. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
An environmental, climate mitigation rationale for research and development (R&D) on liquid transportation fuels derived from plants emerged among many scientists and engineers during the last decade. However, between 2006 and 2010, this climate ethic for pursuing biofuel became politically entangled and conceptually confused with rationales for encouraging greater use of plant-based ethanol that were both unconnected to climate ethics and potentially in conflict with the value-commitments providing a mitigation-oriented reason to promote and develop new and expanded sources of biofuel. I argue that the conceptual construct of technological trajectories provides a fecund approach to the ethical evaluation of R&D strategies in the case of plant-based liquid transportation fuels. The idea of a trajectory has a current use in the literature of science studies and aptly summarizes a number of themes that are critical to the evaluation of tools and techniques whose future shape, design, applications and potential consequences are necessarily somewhat speculative. In the case of biofuels, it is the imagined future trajectory that provides the basis for resistance to an emerging technology, rather than the present-day technical capabilities and the unexpected consequences of biofuel development.
在过去十年间,许多科学家和工程师提出了对源自植物的液体运输燃料进行研发的环境、气候缓解理由。然而,在2006年至2010年期间,这种追求生物燃料的气候伦理在政治上陷入了纠葛,并且在概念上与鼓励更多使用植物基乙醇的理由相混淆,而这些理由既与气候伦理无关,又可能与那些为推广和开发新的、扩大的生物燃料来源提供缓解导向理由的价值承诺相冲突。我认为,技术轨迹的概念构建为评估基于植物的液体运输燃料研发战略的伦理问题提供了一种富有成效的方法。轨迹的概念在科学研究文献中有当前的应用,并且恰当地总结了一些对于评估工具和技术至关重要的主题,这些工具和技术的未来形态、设计、应用及潜在后果必然存在一定的推测性。就生物燃料而言,正是想象中的未来轨迹为抵制一项新兴技术提供了依据,而非当前的技术能力以及生物燃料开发的意外后果。