Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.
Phys Ther. 2012 Oct;92(10):1268-77. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110326. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Although clinicians have a number of measures to use to describe walking performance, few, if any, of the measures capture a person's perceived effort in walking. Perceived effort of walking may be a factor in what a person does versus what he or she is able to do.
The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of perceived effort of walking with gait, function, activity, fear of falling, and confidence in walking in older adults with mobility limitations. Design This investigation was a cross-sectional, descriptive, relational study.
The study took place at a clinical research training center. The participants were 50 older adults (mean age=76.8 years, SD=5.5) with mobility limitations. The measurements used were the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) for walking; gait speed; the Modified Gait Abnormality Rating Scale; energy cost of walking; Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) for total, basic, and advanced lower-extremity function and for disability limitations; activity and restriction subscales of the Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFFE); activity counts; SAFFE fear subscale; and Gait Efficacy Scale (GES). The relationship of the RPE of walking with gait, function, activity, fear, and confidence was determined by using Spearman rank order coefficients and an analysis of variance (adjusted for age and sex) for mean differences between groups defined by no exertion during walking and some exertion during walking.
The RPE was related to confidence in walking (GES, R=-.326, P=.021) and activity (activity counts, R=.295, P=.044). The RPE groups (no exertion versus some exertion) differed in LLFDI scores for total (57.9 versus 53.2), basic (68.6 versus 61.4), and advanced (49.1 versus 42.6) lower-extremity function; LLFDI scores for disability limitations (74.9 versus 67.5); SAFFE fear subscale scores (0.346 versus 0.643); and GES scores (80.1 versus 67.8) (all P<.05). Limitations The range of RPE scores for the participants studied was narrow. Thus, the real correlations between RPE and gait, physical function, and psychological aspects of walking may be greater than the relationships reported.
The perceived effort of walking was associated with physical activity and confidence in walking. Reducing the perceived effort of walking may be an important target of interventions to slow the decline in function of older adults with mobility limitations.
尽管临床医生有许多用于描述步行表现的措施,但很少有(如果有的话)措施能够捕捉到一个人在步行时的感知努力。步行感知努力可能是一个人实际行动与能力之间的因素。
本研究旨在探讨老年人步行感知努力与步态、功能、活动、跌倒恐惧和行走信心之间的关系,这些老年人存在行动受限的问题。设计:本研究为横断面、描述性、关系研究。
该研究在临床研究培训中心进行。参与者为 50 名年龄较大(平均年龄=76.8 岁,标准差=5.5)、行动受限的老年人。使用的测量方法包括步行感知用力程度(RPE);步态速度;改良步态异常评分量表;步行能量消耗;晚年功能和残疾工具(LLFDI),用于总功能、基本功能和高级下肢功能以及残疾限制;活动和限制亚量表的活动和跌倒恐惧老年人调查(SAFFE);活动计数;SAFFE 恐惧子量表;以及步态效能量表(GES)。通过 Spearman 等级相关系数和方差分析(调整年龄和性别),确定步行感知用力程度与步态、功能、活动、恐惧和信心之间的关系,分析方法为根据步行时无用力和有一定用力定义的组之间的均值差异。
RPE 与行走信心(GES,R=-.326,P=.021)和活动(活动计数,R=.295,P=.044)相关。RPE 组(无用力与有一定用力)在 LLFDI 总得分(57.9 与 53.2)、基本得分(68.6 与 61.4)和高级得分(49.1 与 42.6)、LLFDI 残疾限制得分(74.9 与 67.5)、SAFFE 恐惧子量表得分(0.346 与 0.643)和 GES 得分(80.1 与 67.8)方面存在差异(均 P<.05)。局限性:研究参与者的 RPE 评分范围较窄。因此,RPE 与步态、身体功能和行走心理方面的实际相关性可能大于报告的相关性。
步行感知努力与身体活动和行走信心相关。降低步行感知努力可能是减缓行动受限老年人功能下降的重要干预目标。