Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No.88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, People's Republic of China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2785-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2404-6. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
Osteoporotic vertebral compressed fractures (VCFs) are the most common osteoporotic fractures. Although percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) reportedly relieves pain and improves function, a recent pooled analysis from two multicenter randomized controlled trials concluded the improvement in pain and disability treated with PVP was similar to those with sham surgery.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: Using meta-analysis we therefore asked whether compared with either nonoperative therapy or a sham injection for patients with VCF, PVP would (1) better relieve pain, (2) provide greater improvement in pain-related disability, and (3) increase the recurrence of vertebral fractures.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane library using the keywords "vertebroplasty AND osteoporosis OR fracture". We included nine of the 469 articles identified. Using a random effects model, we calculated the weighted mean differences to evaluate the pain reduction at different times as the primary outcome. Pain-related disability was assessed by a quality of life (QOL) measure. Improvement of QOL and recurrence of vertebral fractures were the secondary outcomes. We used subgroup analysis to reinvestigate pain relief and function improvement of PVP based on two different controls: nonoperative therapy and sham injection. The total number of patients was 886.
Pain scoring was similar between the PVP group and the sham injection group at 1 to 29 days and 90 days. However, compared with nonoperative therapy, PVP reduced pain at all times studied. QOL in the PVP group was improved or tended to be improved compared with QOL for both control groups. The risk of new fractures was similar between the PVP groups and both control groups.
Different control groups may have accounted for the different conclusions in the literature regarding the ability of PVP to relieve pain and restore function recovery. Compared with nonoperative treatment PVP relieved pain better and improved QOL. PVP did not increase the risk of new fractures.
Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VCFs)是最常见的骨质疏松性骨折。虽然经皮椎体成形术(PVP)据报道可以缓解疼痛并改善功能,但最近来自两项多中心随机对照试验的汇总分析得出结论,PVP 治疗疼痛和残疾的改善与假手术相似。
问题/目的:因此,我们通过荟萃分析来探讨,与非手术治疗或 VCF 假注射相比,PVP 是否会(1)更好地缓解疼痛,(2)在疼痛相关残疾方面提供更大的改善,以及(3)增加椎体骨折的复发率。
我们使用“vertebroplasty AND osteoporosis OR fracture”等关键词在 PubMed、EMBASE、Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了搜索。我们纳入了 469 篇文章中的 9 篇。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了加权均数差值,以评估不同时间的疼痛缓解作为主要结局。通过生活质量(QOL)测量评估与疼痛相关的残疾情况。QOL 的改善和椎体骨折的复发是次要结局。我们使用亚组分析根据两种不同的对照(非手术治疗和假注射)重新研究 PVP 的疼痛缓解和功能改善。总共有 886 名患者。
在 1 至 29 天和 90 天,PVP 组与假注射组的疼痛评分相似。然而,与非手术治疗相比,PVP 在所有研究时间都减轻了疼痛。与两个对照组相比,PVP 组的 QOL 得到改善或有改善趋势。PVP 组与两个对照组的新发骨折风险相似。
不同的对照组可能导致文献中关于 PVP 缓解疼痛和恢复功能能力的不同结论。与非手术治疗相比,PVP 缓解疼痛的效果更好,改善了 QOL。PVP 并未增加新发骨折的风险。
二级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。