Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍文献的批判性评估:对 DSM-5 的影响。

A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5.

机构信息

National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2012 Jun;25(3):241-51. doi: 10.1002/jts.21699.

Abstract

Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) has been proposed as a diagnosis for capturing the diverse clusters of symptoms observed in survivors of prolonged trauma that are outside the current definition of PTSD. Introducing a new diagnosis requires a high standard of evidence, including a clear definition of the disorder, reliable and valid assessment measures, support for convergent and discriminant validity, and incremental validity with respect to implications for treatment planning and outcome. In this article, the extant literature on CPTSD is reviewed within the framework of construct validity to evaluate the proposed diagnosis on these criteria. Although the efforts in support of CPTSD have brought much needed attention to limitations in the trauma literature, we conclude that available evidence does not support a new diagnostic category at this time. Some directions for future research are suggested.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准已经被提出,旨在对经历长期创伤的幸存者的各种症状进行分类,这些症状超出了目前 PTSD 的定义范围。引入一个新的诊断需要高标准的证据,包括对疾病的清晰定义、可靠和有效的评估措施、对收敛和判别效度的支持,以及对治疗计划和结果的增量有效性。在本文中,将在构念效度的框架内审查 CPTSD 的现有文献,以评估该诊断标准在这些标准上的适用性。虽然支持 CPTSD 的努力已经引起了对创伤文献局限性的极大关注,但我们的结论是,目前还没有证据支持一个新的诊断类别。本文还提出了一些未来研究的方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验