• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment?芬兰癌症患者生存率的地理差异:是偶然因素、混杂因素还是治疗效果?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):210-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.210.
2
Outcome-based equity in the treatment of colon cancer patients in Finland.芬兰结肠癌患者治疗中基于结果的公平性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):619-30. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008497.
3
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
4
Estimating potential savings in cancer deaths by eliminating regional and social class variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries.通过消除北欧国家癌症生存率的地区和社会阶层差异来估算癌症死亡人数的潜在节省量。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Jun;51(3):289-98. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.289.
5
Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with male genital cancers in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006.北欧国家 1964-2003 年间男性生殖器癌症患者的生存趋势,随访至 2006 年底。
Acta Oncol. 2010 Jun;49(5):644-54. doi: 10.3109/02841860903575315.
6
Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.北欧国家 1964-2003 年间诊断为癌症的患者的生存趋势,随访至 2006 年底。材料和方法。
Acta Oncol. 2010 Jun;49(5):545-60. doi: 10.3109/02841861003739322.
7
Travel times to health care and survival from cancers in Northern England.英格兰北部就医的行程时间与癌症患者的生存率
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jan;44(2):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
8
Variation, precision and validity of 1-year survival estimates for lung, breast, colon and prostate cancer in South East England primary care trusts.东南英格兰初级保健信托中肺癌、乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌患者 1 年生存率估计的变异性、精确性和有效性。
Public Health. 2012 Jan;126(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Comparative observational study of mortality amenable by health policy and care between rural and urban Finland: no excess segregation of mortality in the capital despite its increasing residential differentiation.芬兰城乡之间可通过卫生政策和医疗护理改善的死亡率的比较观察研究:尽管首都地区居民分化加剧,但并未出现死亡率过度分化的情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Apr 5;15:59. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0348-2.
10
Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.《2012年意大利癌症数据报告:儿童和青少年癌症》
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1 Suppl 1):1-225.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical issues with geographical variations in the provision of health care services.医疗服务提供中的地域差异所涉及的伦理问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 6;23(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00869-7.
2
Association of Distance to Gynecologic Oncologist and Survival in a Rural Midwestern State.美国中西部农村地区距离妇科肿瘤专家的远近与生存率的关联
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Aug 4;3(1):678-685. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0016. eCollection 2022.
3
Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study.美国妇科肿瘤学劳动力分布的地理差异:妇科肿瘤学会研究
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017 Nov 15;22:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006. eCollection 2017 Nov.
4
Geographic disparities in colorectal cancer survival.结直肠癌生存率的地域差异。
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Jul 23;8:48. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-48.
5
The role of poverty rate and racial distribution in the geographic clustering of breast cancer survival among older women: a geographic and multilevel analysis.贫困率和种族分布在老年女性乳腺癌生存地理聚集性中的作用:一项地理和多层次分析
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 1;169(5):554-61. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn369. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
6
Breast cancer survival by teaching status of the initial treating hospital.根据初次治疗医院的教学状况分析乳腺癌患者的生存率。
CMAJ. 2001 Jan 23;164(2):183-8.
7
Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access.医院临床活动量与医疗保健结果、成本及患者就医机会
Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;6(2):109-14. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.2.109.
8
Survival after acute lymphocytic leukaemia: effects of socioeconomic status and geographic region.急性淋巴细胞白血病后的生存率:社会经济地位和地理区域的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Apr;80(4):311-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.4.311.
9
Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival?乳腺癌死亡率的地区差异:较高的死亡率意味着发病率升高还是生存率降低?
Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):458-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.458.
10
Estimating potential savings in cancer deaths by eliminating regional and social class variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries.通过消除北欧国家癌症生存率的地区和社会阶层差异来估算癌症死亡人数的潜在节省量。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Jun;51(3):289-98. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.3.289.

本文引用的文献

1
The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology.相对生存率:一种统计方法。
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961 Sep;6:101-21.
2
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.在分析生存情况时最大限度地利用生命表法。
J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699-712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7.
3
Health expenditure by area in Finland--an indicator of equity.芬兰各地区的卫生支出——公平性指标
Health Policy. 1987;8(3):299-315. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(87)90006-6.
4
Equity in health care: confronting the confusion.医疗保健中的公平性:直面困惑。
Eff Health Care. 1983 Dec;1(4):179-85.
5
Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal.针对患者退出的异质性进行校正后的癌症生存率。
Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):933-42.
6
Intranational equity in coverage of primary health care: examples from developing countries.国内初级卫生保健覆盖的公平性:来自发展中国家的实例
World Health Stat Q. 1986;39(4):336-44.
7
Measurement of equity in health.健康公平性的衡量。
World Health Stat Q. 1986;39(4):325-35.
8
Survival of female breast cancer patients in Finland and in Estonia: stage at diagnosis important determinant of the difference between countries.芬兰和爱沙尼亚女性乳腺癌患者的生存率:诊断时的分期是两国生存率差异的重要决定因素。
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(3):233-8. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90266-9.
9
Outcome-based equity in the treatment of colon cancer patients in Finland.芬兰结肠癌患者治疗中基于结果的公平性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):619-30. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008497.

芬兰癌症患者生存率的地理差异:是偶然因素、混杂因素还是治疗效果?

Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment?

作者信息

Karjalainen S

机构信息

Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):210-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.210.

DOI:10.1136/jech.44.3.210
PMID:2273358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1060644/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine whether survival of cancer patients in Finland varies with their place of residence, and if so, what proportion of the variation might be due to health services rather than to confounding variables.

DESIGN

Patients with breast and prostatic cancer diagnosed in Finland between 1970 and 1981 were classified by place of residence (from 21 hospital districts), and area specific 5 year relative survival rates were estimated.

SETTING

This was a population based survey of the whole of Finland.

PATIENTS

16,754 cases of breast cancer and 9483 cases of prostatic cancer were identified. Of these, 0.5% of breast cancers and 4.1% of prostatic cancers were excluded because diagnosis was based only on necropsy findings or because the only information available was from the death certificate.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was a large variation in rates, ranging from 59% to 76% for breast cancer, and from 30% to 65% for prostatic cancer. However, after accounting for age of patient and extent of disease, the standardised differences for prostatic cancer closely followed random distribution, indicating equal results of treatment in different areas. For breast cancer there was more variation than expected by chance and patients resident in any of the university central hospital districts with modern radiotherapy equipment survived better than other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little indication that large variations in crude mortality rates from these two cancers in different parts of Finland are due to inequalities of medical care, though a small effect on breast cancer survival which might be care related was shown.

摘要

研究目的

旨在确定芬兰癌症患者的生存率是否因居住地而异,若存在差异,那么该差异中有多大比例可能归因于医疗服务而非混杂变量。

设计

将1970年至1981年间在芬兰被诊断出患有乳腺癌和前列腺癌的患者按居住地(来自21个医院辖区)进行分类,并估算各地区特定的5年相对生存率。

研究背景

这是一项基于芬兰全体人口的调查。

研究对象

共识别出16754例乳腺癌病例和9483例前列腺癌病例。其中,0.5%的乳腺癌病例和4.1%的前列腺癌病例被排除,原因是诊断仅基于尸检结果,或者仅有的可用信息来自死亡证明。

测量指标及主要结果

生存率存在很大差异,乳腺癌的生存率在59%至76%之间,前列腺癌的生存率在30%至65%之间。然而,在考虑患者年龄和疾病程度后,前列腺癌的标准化差异紧密遵循随机分布,表明不同地区的治疗效果相当。对于乳腺癌,其差异超出了偶然预期,居住在任何拥有现代放疗设备的大学中心医院辖区的患者生存率高于其他患者。

结论

几乎没有迹象表明芬兰不同地区这两种癌症的粗死亡率存在巨大差异是由于医疗保健不平等所致,不过显示出对乳腺癌生存率可能与医疗护理相关的微小影响。