Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can Fam Physician. 2012 May;58(5):e267-74.
To study the outcomes of women with infertility or miscarriage treated with natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology or NPT), a systematic medical approach to promoting conception in vivo; and to compare the outcomes with those previously published from a general practice in Ireland.
Retrospective cohort study.
An urban Canadian primary care practice in which the physician had a part-time practice in NPT.
Couples with infertility or recurrent miscarriage who received treatment in the practice between August 2000 and July 2006.
All couples were taught to identify the fertile time of their menstrual cycles using the Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS) and completed a standard NPT evaluation. Many also received additional medical treatment to enhance conception in vivo.
Live birth was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included conceptions, multiple births, low birth weight, and prematurity.
A total of 108 couples received NPT and were included in the analysis, of which 19 (18%) reported having 2 or more previously unexplained miscarriages. The average female age was 35.4 years. Couples had been attempting to conceive for a mean of 3.2 years. Twentytwo participants (20%) had previously given birth; 24 (22%) had previous intrauterine insemination; and 9 (8%) had previous assisted reproductive technology. The cumulative adjusted proportion of first live births for those completing up to 24 months of NPT treatment was 66 per 100 couples, and the crude proportion was 38%. The cumulative adjusted proportion of first conceptions was 73 per 100 couples, and the crude proportion was 47%. Of the 51 couples who conceived, 12 couples (24%) conceived with CrMS instruction alone, 35 (69%) conceived with CrMS and NPT medical treatment, and 4 (8%) conceived after additional surgical treatment. All births were singleton births; 54% were born at 37 weeks' gestation or later; and 78% had birth weights of 2500 g or greater.
Natural procreative technology in a family physician's office was effective in treating infertility and miscarriage with outcomes that were comparable to those in an NPT general practice in Ireland. Larger multicentre prospective studies to compare NPT directly to other forms of infertility treatment are warranted.
研究接受自然生育技术(NaProTechnology 或 NPT)治疗的不孕或流产女性的结局,NPT 是一种促进体内受孕的系统医学方法;并将结果与之前在爱尔兰的普通诊所发表的结果进行比较。
回顾性队列研究。
加拿大城市的一个初级保健诊所,该诊所的医生兼职从事 NPT。
2000 年 8 月至 2006 年 7 月期间在该诊所接受治疗的不孕或反复流产的夫妇。
所有夫妇都接受了使用 Creighton 模型生育保健系统(CrMS)识别其月经周期的生育时间的培训,并完成了标准的 NPT 评估。许多人还接受了额外的医学治疗以增强体内受孕。
活产是主要结果;次要结果包括妊娠、多胎、低出生体重和早产。
共有 108 对夫妇接受了 NPT 治疗并纳入分析,其中 19 对(18%)报告有 2 次或以上先前不明原因的流产。女性的平均年龄为 35.4 岁。夫妇平均尝试受孕 3.2 年。22 名参与者(20%)曾生育过;24 名(22%)曾进行过宫内人工授精;9 名(8%)曾进行过辅助生殖技术。完成长达 24 个月 NPT 治疗的夫妇中,首次活产的累积调整比例为每 100 对 66 对,粗比例为 38%。首次妊娠的累积调整比例为每 100 对 73 对,粗比例为 47%。在 51 名受孕的夫妇中,12 对(24%)仅接受 CrMS 指导受孕,35 对(69%)接受 CrMS 和 NPT 医疗治疗受孕,4 对(8%)接受额外手术治疗后受孕。所有分娩均为单胎分娩;54%在 37 周或以上的孕龄分娩;78%的新生儿体重在 2500 克或以上。
在家庭医生办公室进行的自然生育技术在治疗不孕和流产方面是有效的,其结果与爱尔兰的 NPT 普通诊所相当。需要更大规模的多中心前瞻性研究来直接比较 NPT 与其他形式的不孕治疗。