• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项在乌干达坎帕拉开展的社区动员干预措施,旨在预防针对妇女的暴力行为和降低艾滋病病毒感染风险(SASA! 研究):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。

A community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV/AIDS risk in Kampala, Uganda (the SASA! Study): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Gender Violence and Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Jun 29;13:96. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-96.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-96
PMID:22747846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3503643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gender based violence, including violence by an intimate partner, is a major global human rights and public health problem, with important connections with HIV risk. Indeed, the elimination of sexual and gender based violence is a core pillar of HIV prevention for UNAIDS. Integrated strategies to address the gender norms, relations and inequities that underlie both violence against women and HIV/AIDS are needed. However there is limited evidence about the potential impact of different intervention models. This protocol describes the SASA!

STUDY

an evaluation of a community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV/AIDS risk in Kampala, Uganda.

METHODS/DESIGN: The SASA! STUDY is a pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial being conducted in eight communities in Kampala. It is designed to assess the community-level impact of the SASA! intervention on the following six primary outcomes: attitudes towards the acceptability of violence against women and the acceptability of a woman refusing sex (among male and female community members); past year experience of physical intimate partner violence and sexual intimate partner violence (among females); community responses to women experiencing violence (among women reporting past year physical/sexual partner violence); and past year concurrency of sexual partners (among males). 1583 women and men (aged 18-49 years) were surveyed in intervention and control communities prior to intervention implementation in 2007/8. A follow-up cross-sectional survey of community members will take place in 2012. The primary analysis will be an adjusted cluster-level intention to treat analysis, comparing outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. Complementary monitoring and evaluation and qualitative research will be used to explore and describe the process of intervention implementation and the pathways through which change is achieved.

DISCUSSION

This is one of few cluster randomised trials globally to assess the impact of a gender-focused community mobilisation intervention. The multi-disciplinary research approach will enable us to address questions of intervention impact and mechanisms of action, as well as its feasibility, acceptability and transferability to other contexts. The results will be of importance to researchers, policy makers and those working on the front line to prevent violence against women and HIV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00790959.

摘要

背景

性别暴力,包括亲密伴侣的暴力行为,是一个严重的全球人权和公共卫生问题,与艾滋病毒风险有重要联系。事实上,消除性暴力和性别暴力是艾滋病规划署艾滋病毒预防的核心支柱。需要采取综合战略来解决性别规范、关系和不平等问题,这些问题是暴力侵害妇女和艾滋病毒/艾滋病的基础。然而,关于不同干预模式潜在影响的证据有限。本方案描述了 SASA!

研究

在乌干达坎帕拉评估一项动员社区干预措施,以预防暴力侵害妇女和减少艾滋病毒/艾滋病风险。

方法/设计:SASA!研究是在坎帕拉的八个社区中进行的配对集群随机对照试验。它旨在评估 SASA!干预对以下六个主要结果的社区层面影响:对暴力侵害妇女行为可接受性和妇女拒绝性行为可接受性的态度(在男性和女性社区成员中);过去一年中身体亲密伴侣暴力和性亲密伴侣暴力的经历(在女性中);社区对经历暴力的妇女的反应(在过去一年中报告身体/性伴侣暴力的妇女中);以及过去一年中性伴侣的并发情况(在男性中)。2007/8 年干预实施前,在干预和对照社区中对 1583 名 18-49 岁的男女进行了调查。2012 年将对社区成员进行一次后续横断面调查。主要分析将是调整后的集群水平意向治疗分析,比较干预和对照社区在随访时的结果。将使用补充监测和评价以及定性研究来探索和描述干预实施的过程以及实现变革的途径。

讨论

这是全球为数不多的评估以性别为重点的社区动员干预措施影响的集群随机试验之一。多学科研究方法将使我们能够解决干预影响和作用机制的问题,以及其可行性、可接受性和在其他情况下的可转移性。结果对研究人员、政策制定者和在预防暴力侵害妇女和艾滋病毒的第一线工作的人将非常重要。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00790959。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/e1f03585c41c/1745-6215-13-96-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/8ab4b018f847/1745-6215-13-96-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/affb90925162/1745-6215-13-96-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/b28f44ca8a44/1745-6215-13-96-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/5b3b88a9eb7e/1745-6215-13-96-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/69832fdfb6fe/1745-6215-13-96-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/4fb4999f14d6/1745-6215-13-96-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/e1f03585c41c/1745-6215-13-96-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/8ab4b018f847/1745-6215-13-96-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/affb90925162/1745-6215-13-96-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/b28f44ca8a44/1745-6215-13-96-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/5b3b88a9eb7e/1745-6215-13-96-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/69832fdfb6fe/1745-6215-13-96-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/4fb4999f14d6/1745-6215-13-96-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64de/3503643/e1f03585c41c/1745-6215-13-96-7.jpg

相似文献

1
A community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV/AIDS risk in Kampala, Uganda (the SASA! Study): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项在乌干达坎帕拉开展的社区动员干预措施,旨在预防针对妇女的暴力行为和降低艾滋病病毒感染风险(SASA! 研究):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Jun 29;13:96. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-96.
2
Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda.“萨萨!”研究的结果:一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估在乌干达坎帕拉开展的一项社区动员干预措施对预防针对妇女的暴力行为及降低感染艾滋病毒风险的影响。
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 31;12:122. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5.
3
Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?预防的生态途径:“SASA!”社区动员模式如何预防针对妇女的亲密伴侣身体暴力?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 16;16:339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3018-9.
4
Examining diffusion to understand the how of SASA!, a violence against women and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda.研究扩散情况,了解 SASA! 如何预防乌干达的暴力侵害妇女和艾滋病毒。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 11;18(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5508-4.
5
The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda.社区动员干预措施“SASA!”对女性亲密伴侣暴力经历的影响:乌干达坎帕拉一项整群随机试验的次要结果
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Aug;70(8):818-25. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206665. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
6
'SASA! is the medicine that treats violence'. Qualitative findings on how a community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women created change in Kampala, Uganda.“萨萨!”是治疗暴力的药物。关于乌干达坎帕拉一项预防针对妇女暴力行为的社区动员干预措施如何带来改变的定性研究结果 。
Glob Health Action. 2014 Sep 12;7:25082. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25082. eCollection 2014.
7
Changing the norms that drive intimate partner violence: findings from a cluster randomised trial on what predisposes bystanders to take action in Kampala, Uganda.改变助长亲密伴侣暴力行为的规范:一项关于在乌干达坎帕拉促使旁观者采取行动的因素的整群随机试验的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 14;3(6):e001109. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001109. eCollection 2018.
8
The impact of SASA!, a community mobilization intervention, on reported HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics in Kampala, Uganda.“萨萨!”(SASA!)这一社区动员干预措施对乌干达坎帕拉地区报告的与艾滋病病毒相关的风险行为及关系动态的影响。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 5;17(1):19232. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.19232. eCollection 2014.
9
Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a community mobilisation intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉减少亲密伴侣暴力的社区动员干预措施的成本及成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 29;16:196. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2883-6.
10
Exploring Couples' Processes of Change in the Context of SASA!, a Violence Against Women and HIV Prevention Intervention in Uganda.在乌干达一项针对妇女暴力与艾滋病毒预防干预措施“SASA!”的背景下,探究夫妻的改变过程。
Prev Sci. 2017 Feb;18(2):233-244. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0716-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between partner violence, and the appearance of symptoms of sexually transmitted infections, and reproductive tract infections among Afghan refugee women in Iran: a cross-sectional study.伊朗阿富汗难民妇女中伴侣暴力与性传播感染及生殖道感染症状出现之间的关联:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 16;25(1):1803. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21239-5.
2
Factors and consequences associated with intimate partner violence against women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.与中低收入国家针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力相关的因素和后果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0293295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293295. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence.哪些因素与近期亲密伴侣暴力有关?来自世卫组织妇女健康和家庭暴力多国研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 16;11:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-109.
2
Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study.南非年轻女性中亲密伴侣暴力、关系权力不平等与艾滋病毒感染发生率:一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):41-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60548-X.
3
BETWEEN WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND MEN'S AUTHORITY: MASCULINITY AND SHIFTING DISCOURSES OF GENDER DIFFERENCE IN URBAN UGANDA.
A Comparative Analysis of Gender Discrepancy Stress, Attitudes toward Intimate Partner Violence, and Perpetration among Young Adults in the USA and Uganda.
中美两国青年性别差异压力、亲密伴侣暴力态度和施暴行为的比较分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013373.
4
The practice of pilot/feasibility studies in informing the conduct of HIV related clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区开展先导/可行性研究以指导艾滋病相关临床试验的实践:一项范围综述
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Jul 8;29:100959. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100959. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Economies of scale of large-scale international development interventions: Evidence from self-help groups in India.大规模国际发展干预措施的规模经济:来自印度自助团体的证据。
World Dev. 2022 May;153:105839. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105839.
6
A summative content analysis of how programmes to improve the right to sexual and reproductive health address power.对旨在改善性健康和生殖健康权利的方案如何处理权力问题的总结性内容分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008438.
7
Examining Masculinities to Inform Gender-Transformative Violence Prevention Programs: Qualitative Findings From Rakai, Uganda.审视男子气概以推动性别暴力预防项目:来自乌干达拉凯的定性研究结果。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Feb 28;10(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00137.
8
An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda.乌干达发展背景下针对妇女的身体暴力及其正当性研究
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 29;16(9):e0255281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255281. eCollection 2021.
9
A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a gender transformative intervention on intimate partner violence against women in newly formed neighbourhood groups in Tanzania.一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估在坦桑尼亚新成立的邻里团体中,实施性别赋权干预对针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004555.
10
Correlates of Safety Strategy Use Among South African Women Living With HIV and at Risk of Intimate Partner Violence.南非艾滋病毒感染者和亲密伴侣暴力风险妇女的安全策略使用相关性。
Violence Against Women. 2022 May;28(6-7):1505-1522. doi: 10.1177/10778012211021108. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
女性权利与男性权威之间:乌干达城市地区的男性气质与性别差异话语的转变
Gend Soc. 2008;22(6):799-823. doi: 10.1177/0891243208325888.
4
Intimate partner violence attitudes and experience among women and men in Uganda.乌干达男女对亲密伴侣暴力的态度和经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Jul;25(7):1224-41. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340550. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
Is sexual risk taking behaviour changing in rural south-west Uganda? Behaviour trends in a rural population cohort 1993-2006.乌干达西南部农村地区的性冒险行为正在发生变化吗?1993 - 2006年农村人口队列中的行为趋势。
Sex Transm Infect. 2009 Apr;85 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-11. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.033928.
6
Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial.垫脚石对南非农村地区艾滋病毒和单纯疱疹病毒2型发病率及性行为的影响:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a506. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a506.
7
A combined microfinance and training intervention can reduce HIV risk behaviour in young female participants.小额信贷与培训相结合的干预措施可以降低年轻女性参与者感染艾滋病毒的风险行为。
AIDS. 2008 Aug 20;22(13):1659-65. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328307a040.
8
HIV prevalence and incidence are no longer falling in southwest Uganda: evidence from a rural population cohort 1989-2005.乌干达西南部的艾滋病毒流行率和发病率不再下降:1989 - 2005年农村人口队列研究的证据
AIDS. 2008 Aug 20;22(13):1641-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830a7502.
9
Gender and AIDS: time to act.性别与艾滋病:行动时刻。
AIDS. 2008 Aug;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S35-43. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000327435.28538.18.
10
Alcohol use, intimate partner violence, sexual coercion and HIV among women aged 15-24 in Rakai, Uganda.乌干达拉凯地区15至24岁女性中的饮酒、亲密伴侣暴力、性胁迫与艾滋病毒情况。
AIDS Behav. 2009 Apr;13(2):225-33. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9333-5. Epub 2007 Dec 7.