• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时一项研究可以在另一个研究环境中有用?理解研究的适用性和可转移性的看法。

When can research from one setting be useful in another? Understanding perceptions of the applicability and transferability of research.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London Schoolo f Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2013 Sep;28(3):418-30. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das026. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/das026
PMID:22752106
Abstract

Determining whether research findings from one setting are relevant to another is complex and poorly understood. This study aimed to explore the factors affecting whether research from other settings was perceived to be of potential use to those working in or researching maternal health in Ghana. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 69 purposively sampled government decision-makers, researchers and other stakeholders working in maternal health in Ghana in 2008-09. The most influential factors affecting perceptions of applicability/transferability were the study's congruence with interviewees' previous experiences and beliefs. Interventions' adaptability was also considered crucial (and more important than remaining faithful to the original intervention). However, it was frequently considered a distinct stage in the research use process rather than a consideration of applicability/transferability. More attention was paid to the implementability of the intervention in the new setting, than to whether it would be as effective there. Interpretations of intervention descriptions and evaluation findings varied between interviewees, even when the same information was presented. This study is one of the first to explore perceptions of applicability/transferability of public health research among researchers and potential research users in a low-income setting. The findings suggest that existing frameworks of applicability/transferability do not reflect the factors considered to be most important in Ghana.

摘要

确定一个环境中的研究结果是否适用于另一个环境是复杂且理解不充分的。本研究旨在探索影响其他环境中的研究是否被认为对在加纳从事或研究孕产妇健康的人有用的因素。2008-2009 年,对加纳孕产妇健康领域的 69 名政府决策者、研究人员和其他利益攸关方进行了半结构式访谈,这些人是通过有目的抽样选择的。影响适用性/可转移性看法的最主要因素是研究与受访者以往经验和信念的一致性。干预措施的适应性也被认为是至关重要的(比忠实于原始干预措施更重要)。然而,它通常被认为是研究使用过程中的一个独特阶段,而不是适用性/可转移性的考虑因素。人们更加关注干预措施在新环境中的实施可行性,而不是关注其在那里的有效性。即使提供了相同的信息,受访者对干预描述和评估结果的解释也存在差异。本研究是第一个探索在低收入环境中,研究人员和潜在研究使用者对公共卫生研究的适用性/可转移性的看法的研究之一。研究结果表明,现有的适用性/可转移性框架并没有反映出在加纳被认为最重要的因素。

相似文献

1
When can research from one setting be useful in another? Understanding perceptions of the applicability and transferability of research.何时一项研究可以在另一个研究环境中有用?理解研究的适用性和可转移性的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2013 Sep;28(3):418-30. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das026. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
2
The applicability and transferability of public health research from one setting to another: a survey of maternal health researchers.公共卫生研究在不同环境中的适用性和可转移性:对孕产妇健康研究人员的调查。
Glob Health Promot. 2013 Mar;20(1):16-24. doi: 10.1177/1757975913476904.
3
How do we know when research from one setting can be useful in another? A review of external validity, applicability and transferability frameworks.我们如何知道一个研究结果在另一个环境中是否有用?对外部有效性、适用性和可转移性框架的回顾。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Oct;16(4):238-44. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010124.
4
Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health.循证公共卫生中干预措施的适用性与可转移性
Health Promot Int. 2006 Mar;21(1):76-83. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai025. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
5
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
6
Intersectoral debate on social research strengthens alliances, advocacy and action for maternal survival in Zambia.赞比亚关于社会研究的跨部门辩论加强了为孕产妇生存而建立的联盟、宣传及行动。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan036. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
7
Assessment of applicability and transferability of evidence-based antenatal interventions to the Australian indigenous setting.评估基于证据的产前干预措施在澳大利亚土著环境中的适用性和可转移性。
Health Promot Int. 2012 Jun;27(2):208-19. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar032. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
8
The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.医患互动研究:方法学问题综述
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-17.
9
Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process.合作经验:让决策者参与研究过程。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8 Suppl 2:26-34. doi: 10.1258/135581903322405144.
10
Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation: a participatory process in three developing countries.确定安全孕产项目评估的优先事项:三个发展中国家的参与式过程。
Health Policy. 2007 Sep;83(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Reading Difficulties in Individuals with Homonymous Visual Field Defects: A Systematic Review of Reported Interventions.同向性视野缺损个体的阅读困难:已报道干预措施的系统评价
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jun;35(2):254-300. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09636-4. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Using Wash'Em to Design Handwashing Programmes for Crisis-Affected Populations in Zimbabwe: A Process Evaluation.使用 Wash'Em 为津巴布韦受危机影响人群设计洗手方案:过程评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;21(3):260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030260.
3
Development of the UPSIDES global mental health training programme for peer support workers: Perspectives from stakeholders in low, middle and high-income countries.
UPSIDES 全球精神健康朋辈支持工作者培训项目的制定:来自中低收入国家利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 26;19(2):e0298315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298315. eCollection 2024.
4
Sorry we're open, come in we're closed: different profiles in the perceived applicability of open science practices to completed research projects.抱歉,我们营业,进来吧,我们关门了:开放科学实践在已完成研究项目中的感知适用性的不同概况。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 31;11(1):230595. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230595. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Factors influencing shared decision-making for insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea treatment among Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury.影响轻度创伤性脑损伤退伍军人失眠和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗共同决策的因素。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 May 1;20(5):801-812. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10994.
6
The role of self-compassion in diabetes management: A rapid review.自我同情在糖尿病管理中的作用:一项快速综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1123157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1123157. eCollection 2023.
7
Improving quantitative synthesis to achieve generality in ecology.提高定量综合方法以实现生态学的一般性。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec;6(12):1818-1828. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01891-z. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
The energy and time saving coordinated control methods of CO2, VOCs, and PM2.5 in office buildings.办公建筑 CO2、VOCs 和 PM2.5 协同节能控制方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 27;17(9):e0275157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275157. eCollection 2022.
9
Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.评估卫生创新可扩展性的工具:系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00830-5.
10
Sharing believable stories: A qualitative study exploring the relevance of case studies for influencing the creation of healthy environments.分享可信的故事:一项定性研究探索案例研究对于影响健康环境创造的相关性。
Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102615. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102615. Epub 2021 Jul 25.