• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么图片命名比单词阅读花费的时间更长?发音过程的贡献。

Why does picture naming take longer than word reading? The contribution of articulatory processes.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, UMR 7291 & Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, UMR 7290, CNRS / Aix-Marseille Université, 3, place Victor-Hugo, 13331, Marseille cedex 3, France.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):955-61. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0287-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0287-x
PMID:22753046
Abstract

Since the 19th century, it has been known that response latencies are longer for naming pictures than for reading words aloud. While several interpretations have been proposed, a common general assumption is that this difference stems from cognitive word-selection processes and not from articulatory processes. Here we show that, contrary to this widely accepted view, articulatory processes are also affected by the task performed. To demonstrate this, we used a procedure that to our knowledge had never been used in research on language processing: response-latency fractionating. Along with vocal onsets, we recorded the electromyographic (EMG) activity of facial muscles while participants named pictures or read words aloud. On the basis of these measures, we were able to fractionate the verbal response latencies into two types of time intervals: premotor times (from stimulus presentation to EMG onset), mostly reflecting cognitive processes, and motor times (from EMG onset to vocal onset), related to motor execution processes. We showed that premotor and motor times are both longer in picture naming than in reading, although than in reading, although articulation is already initiated in the latter measure. Future studies based on this new approach should bring valuable clues for a better understanding of the relation between the cognitive and motor processes involved in speech production.

摘要

自 19 世纪以来,人们已经知道命名图片的反应时比大声朗读单词的反应时长。虽然已经提出了几种解释,但一个普遍的共识是,这种差异源于认知选词过程,而不是发音过程。在这里,我们表明,与这种被广泛接受的观点相反,发音过程也受到所执行任务的影响。为了证明这一点,我们使用了一种在语言处理研究中从未使用过的程序:反应时分段。我们在参与者命名图片或大声朗读单词时,记录了面部肌肉的肌电图(EMG)活动,以及声音的起始时间。基于这些测量结果,我们能够将言语反应时分为两种类型的时间间隔:运动前时间(从刺激呈现到 EMG 起始),主要反映认知过程,以及运动时间(从 EMG 起始到声音起始),与运动执行过程相关。我们表明,在图片命名中,运动前时间和运动时间都比朗读时长,尽管在后者的测量中,发音已经开始。基于这种新方法的未来研究应该为更好地理解言语产生中涉及的认知和运动过程之间的关系提供有价值的线索。

相似文献

1
Why does picture naming take longer than word reading? The contribution of articulatory processes.为什么图片命名比单词阅读花费的时间更长?发音过程的贡献。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):955-61. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0287-x.
2
Corrigendum to "Why does picture naming take longer than word naming? The contribution of articulatory processes".《为何图片命名比单词命名耗时更长?发音过程的作用》勘误
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):309-11. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0668-4.
3
Lexical frequency effects on articulation: a comparison of picture naming and reading aloud.词汇频率对发音的影响:图片命名与大声朗读的比较
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 15;6:1571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01571. eCollection 2015.
4
"When" Does Picture Naming Take Longer Than Word Reading?图片命名何时会比单词阅读耗时更长?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 25;7:31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00031. eCollection 2016.
5
When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.当阅读脏话时会阻碍图片处理吗?禁忌对言语和手动反应的干扰。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2301-2308. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1468-z.
6
Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.利用眼动追踪注意力和口语单词规划的激活流程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):353-68. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.353.
7
Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.词汇和图像刺激认知加工的理论分析:阅读、命名以及视觉与概念比较
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jan;96(1):5-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.1.5.
8
Temporal invariance for picture-word translation: evidence from drawing-writing and naming-reading tasks.图文翻译中的时间不变性:来自绘画书写和命名阅读任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1994 Jul;22(4):442-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03200869.
9
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
10
Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming.图片命名中的任务选择与语义干扰
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct electrical stimulation of the left frontal aslant tract disrupts sentence planning without affecting articulation.直接刺激左额斜束会破坏句子规划而不影响发音。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2019 May-Jun;36(3-4):178-192. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1619544. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
Cognate Costs in Bilingual Speech Production: Evidence from Language Switching.双语言语产生中的同源成本:来自语言切换的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 28;7:1461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01461. eCollection 2016.
3
"When" Does Picture Naming Take Longer Than Word Reading?

本文引用的文献

1
Cascading influences on the production of speech: evidence from articulation.言语产生的级联影响:发音证据
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):243-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
2
Teager-Kaiser energy operation of surface EMG improves muscle activity onset detection.表面肌电图的蒂格-凯泽能量运算可改善肌肉活动起始检测。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Sep;35(9):1532-8. doi: 10.1007/s10439-007-9320-z. Epub 2007 May 1.
3
Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration.
图片命名何时会比单词阅读耗时更长?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 25;7:31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00031. eCollection 2016.
4
The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.字母识别中视觉影响的时程。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):406-14. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0400-5.
5
Lexical frequency effects on articulation: a comparison of picture naming and reading aloud.词汇频率对发音的影响:图片命名与大声朗读的比较
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 15;6:1571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01571. eCollection 2015.
6
The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production and reading aloud: evidence and implications.言语产生和朗读中作为最小规划单元的语段:证据及启示
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 29;6:1457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01457. eCollection 2015.
7
Articulatory imaging implicates prediction during spoken language comprehension.发音成像表明在口语理解过程中存在预测。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1136-47. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0530-6.
8
Beta oscillations reflect memory and motor aspects of spoken word production.β振荡反映了口语产生的记忆和运动方面。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jul;36(7):2767-80. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22806. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
9
The electrophysiology of language production: what could be improved.语言产生的电生理学:哪些方面可以改进。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 13;5:1560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01560. eCollection 2014.
10
A comparison of two procedures for verbal response time fractionation.两种言语反应时间细分程序的比较。
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 24;5:1213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01213. eCollection 2014.
表征言语产生的运动执行阶段:辅音对延迟命名潜伏期和起始持续时间的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1083-95. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1083.
4
Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names.物体命名及读其名称时语音编码的连续性
Mem Cognit. 2004 Mar;32(2):212-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03196853.
5
Articulatory duration in single-word speech production.单字言语产生中的发音时长。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):416-31. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.416.
6
Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis.西蒙效应中的执行控制:肌电图与分布分析
Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):324-36. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6. Epub 2002 Aug 14.
7
Partial advance information, number of alternatives, and motor processes: an electromyographic study.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jul;111(1):125-39. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00019-7.
8
A theory of lexical access in speech production.言语产生中的词汇通达理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776.
9
The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Sep;129(3):340-60. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.3.340.
10
Reading aloud begins when the computation of phonology is complete.当语音计算完成时,朗读开始。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1178-91. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1178.