Suppr超能文献

词汇频率对发音的影响:图片命名与大声朗读的比较

Lexical frequency effects on articulation: a comparison of picture naming and reading aloud.

作者信息

Mousikou Petroula, Rastle Kathleen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London Egham, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 15;6:1571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01571. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The present study investigated whether lexical frequency, a variable that is known to affect the time taken to utter a verbal response, may also influence articulation. Pairs of words that differed in terms of their relative frequency, but were matched on their onset, vowel, and number of phonemes (e.g., map vs. mat, where the former is more frequent than the latter) were used in a picture naming and a reading aloud task. Low-frequency items yielded slower response latencies than high-frequency items in both tasks, with the frequency effect being significantly larger in picture naming compared to reading aloud. Also, initial-phoneme durations were longer for low-frequency items than for high-frequency items. The frequency effect on initial-phoneme durations was slightly more prominent in picture naming than in reading aloud, yet its size was very small, thus preventing us from concluding that lexical frequency exerts an influence on articulation. Additionally, initial-phoneme and whole-word durations were significantly longer in reading aloud compared to picture naming. We discuss our findings in the context of current theories of reading aloud and speech production, and the approaches they adopt in relation to the nature of information flow (staged vs. cascaded) between cognitive and articulatory levels of processing.

摘要

本研究调查了词汇频率(一个已知会影响说出言语反应所需时间的变量)是否也会影响发音。在一项图片命名和大声朗读任务中,使用了成对的单词,这些单词在相对频率上有所不同,但在起始音、元音和音素数量上相匹配(例如,map与mat,前者比后者频率更高)。在这两项任务中,低频项目的反应潜伏期都比高频项目慢,与大声朗读相比,图片命名中的频率效应显著更大。此外,低频项目的初始音素持续时间比高频项目更长。图片命名中对初始音素持续时间的频率效应比大声朗读中略为明显,但其大小非常小,因此我们无法得出词汇频率对发音有影响的结论。此外,与图片命名相比,大声朗读时初始音素和整个单词的持续时间明显更长。我们在当前大声朗读和言语产生理论的背景下讨论了我们的发现,以及它们在认知和发音处理水平之间信息流性质(分阶段与级联)方面所采用的方法。

相似文献

2
"When" Does Picture Naming Take Longer Than Word Reading?图片命名何时会比单词阅读耗时更长?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 25;7:31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00031. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic classification of pictures and words.图片和文字的语义分类。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1502-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.975728. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
7
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.
8
Cascading influences on the production of speech: evidence from articulation.言语产生的级联影响:发音证据
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):243-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
9
Mechanisms of interaction in speech production.言语产生中的交互机制。
Lang Cogn Process. 2009 May 1;24(4):527-554. doi: 10.1080/01690960802299378.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验