• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低资源和中等资源环境下微生物饮用水测试的综合目录。

A summary catalogue of microbial drinking water tests for low and medium resource settings.

机构信息

Water and Health Research Centre/Merchant Venturers Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 May;9(5):1609-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9051609. Epub 2012 May 4.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph9051609
PMID:22754460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3386575/
Abstract

Microbial drinking-water quality testing plays an essential role in measures to protect public health. However, such testing remains a significant challenge where resources are limited. With a wide variety of tests available, researchers and practitioners have expressed difficulties in selecting the most appropriate test(s) for a particular budget, application and setting. To assist the selection process we identified the characteristics associated with low and medium resource settings and we specified the basic information that is needed for different forms of water quality monitoring. We then searched for available faecal indicator bacteria tests and collated this information. In total 44 tests have been identified, 18 of which yield a presence/absence result and 26 of which provide enumeration of bacterial concentration. The suitability of each test is assessed for use in the three settings. The cost per test was found to vary from $0.60 to $5.00 for a presence/absence test and from $0.50 to $7.50 for a quantitative format, though it is likely to be only a small component of the overall costs of testing. This article presents the first comprehensive catalogue of the characteristics of available and emerging low-cost tests for faecal indicator bacteria. It will be of value to organizations responsible for monitoring national water quality, water service providers, researchers and policy makers in selecting water quality tests appropriate for a given setting and application.

摘要

微生物饮用水质量检测在保护公众健康的措施中起着至关重要的作用。然而,在资源有限的情况下,这种检测仍然是一个重大挑战。由于有各种各样的测试可用,研究人员和从业者在为特定预算、应用和环境选择最合适的测试方面表示困难。为了协助选择过程,我们确定了与低资源和中资源环境相关的特征,并指定了不同形式的水质监测所需的基本信息。然后,我们搜索了可用的粪便指示细菌测试并整理了这些信息。总共确定了 44 种测试,其中 18 种提供存在/不存在的结果,26 种提供细菌浓度的计数。评估了每种测试在三种环境中的适用性。发现每种测试的单价从存在/不存在测试的 0.60 美元到 5.00 美元不等,从定量格式的 0.50 美元到 7.50 美元不等,尽管它可能只是测试总成本的一小部分。本文首次全面介绍了现有的和新兴的低成本粪便指示细菌测试的特点目录。它将对负责监测国家水质的组织、供水服务提供商、研究人员和政策制定者在为特定环境和应用选择适当的水质测试方面具有价值。

相似文献

1
A summary catalogue of microbial drinking water tests for low and medium resource settings.低资源和中等资源环境下微生物饮用水测试的综合目录。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 May;9(5):1609-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9051609. Epub 2012 May 4.
2
Development and field testing of low-cost, quantal microbial assays with volunteer reporting as scalable means of drinking water safety estimation.开发并实地测试低成本、定量微生物检测方法,采用志愿者报告作为可扩展的饮用水安全评估手段。
J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Jun;126(6):1944-1954. doi: 10.1111/jam.14253. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Locally produced hydrogen sulphide detecting water quality test kits increase household level monitoring in rural Tanzania.当地生产的硫化氢检测水质测试套件增加了坦桑尼亚农村地区的家庭层面监测。
J Water Health. 2018 Jun;16(3):359-368. doi: 10.2166/wh.2018.220.
4
[Comparative assessment of sanitary and epidemic importance of indicator coliform indices of drinking water quality].[饮用水水质指示性大肠菌群指标的卫生流行病学重要性比较评估]
Gig Sanit. 2016;95(6):582-8.
5
Asellus aquaticus as a potential carrier of Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria into drinking water distribution systems.水生蜚蠊作为大肠杆菌和其他大肠菌类进入饮用水分配系统的潜在载体。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Mar 1;10(3):845-55. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10030845.
6
Evaluation of an Inexpensive Growth Medium for Direct Detection of Escherichia coli in Temperate and Sub-Tropical Waters.一种用于直接检测温带和亚热带水域中大肠杆菌的廉价生长培养基的评估
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0140997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140997. eCollection 2015.
7
[Scientific substantiation of perfection of sanitary bacteriological monitoring in drinking water use].[饮用水卫生细菌学监测完善性的科学依据]
Gig Sanit. 2014 Nov-Dec;93(6):68-72.
8
Water quality at points-of-use in the Galapagos Islands.加拉帕戈斯群岛使用点的水质。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Apr;220(2 Pt B):485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
Well water quality in rural Nicaragua using a low-cost bacterial test and microbial source tracking.尼加拉瓜农村地区井水水质检测:采用低成本细菌检测和微生物源追踪方法
J Water Health. 2016 Apr;14(2):199-207. doi: 10.2166/wh.2015.075.
10
Feasibility of the hydrogen sulfide test for the assessment of drinking water quality in post-earthquake Haiti.评估海地地震后饮用水质量的硫化氢测试的可行性。
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Dec;186(12):8509-16. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4020-2. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Power of Low vs High-Precision Methods for Measuring in Drinking Water in Low-Resource Settings.低资源环境下测量饮用水中[物质]的低精度与高精度方法的效能比较。 (注:原文中“Measuring in Drinking Water”里“Measuring”后缺少具体测量对象,这里补充了“[物质]”使句子完整通顺)
ACS ES T Water. 2025 Apr 23;5(5):2244-2254. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.4c01117. eCollection 2025 May 9.
2
Evaluation of drinking water quality test kits for home use in the United States.美国家用饮用水水质检测试剂盒的评估
J Water Health. 2025 Mar;23(3):350-363. doi: 10.2166/wh.2025.289. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
3
Evaluation of a Tetracycline-Resistant Enumeration Method for Correctly Classifying in Environmental Waters in Kentucky, USA.美国肯塔基州环境水体中四环素抗性菌正确分类计数方法的评估
Pathogens. 2023 Aug 28;12(9):1090. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12091090.
4
Phage-Inducible Chromosomal Islands as a Diagnostic Platform to Capture and Detect Bacterial Pathogens.噬菌体诱导的染色体岛作为一种诊断平台,用于捕获和检测细菌病原体。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Aug;10(24):e2301643. doi: 10.1002/advs.202301643. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Rapid, sensitive, and low-cost detection of Escherichia coli bacteria in contaminated water samples using a phage-based assay.利用基于噬菌体的检测方法快速、灵敏、低成本地检测污染水样中的大肠杆菌。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11468-2.
6
The One Nutrition in Complex Environments (ONCE) study protocol: a cluster-randomized multi-level multi-sectoral intervention to improve nutrition in Uganda.《复杂环境中的单一营养》(ONCE)研究方案:乌干达改善营养的一项集群随机、多层次多部门干预研究
Trials. 2022 Apr 1;23(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06170-7.
7
From Fully Physical to Virtual Sensing for Water Quality Assessment: A Comprehensive Review of the Relevant State-of-the-Art.从完全物理到虚拟传感的水质评估:相关技术现状的全面综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;21(21):6971. doi: 10.3390/s21216971.
8
Monitoring Drinking Water Quality in Nationally Representative Household Surveys in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Cross-Sectional Analysis of 27 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys 2014-2020.监测中低收入国家全国代表性家庭调查中的饮用水水质:2014-2020 年 27 项多指标类集调查的横断面分析。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Sep;129(9):97010. doi: 10.1289/EHP8459. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
Flow-Through Electrochemical Biosensor for the Detection of Using Oligonucleotides.基于寡核苷酸的流通式电化学生物传感器检测 。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 28;21(11):3754. doi: 10.3390/s21113754.
10
Fecal Indicator Bacteria Data to Characterize Drinking Water Quality in Low-Resource Settings: Summary of Current Practices and Recommendations for Improving Validity.粪便指示细菌数据在低资源环境下对饮用水质量进行特征描述:当前实践的总结及提高有效性的建议。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 28;18(5):2353. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052353.

本文引用的文献

1
Global access to safe water: accounting for water quality and the resulting impact on MDG progress.全球安全用水的获取情况:考量水质及其对千年发展目标进展的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Mar;9(3):880-94. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9030880. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
2
Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries.将水质监测纳入监测获得安全饮用水的目标范围,作为千年发展目标的一部分:五个国家的经验教训。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Mar 1;90(3):228-235A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.094284. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
3
The H(2)S test versus standard indicator bacteria tests for faecal contamination of water: systematic review and meta-analysis.硫化氢(H₂S)试验与标准指示菌试验检测水中粪便污染的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jan;17(1):94-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02887.x. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
4
Ambient-temperature incubation for the field detection of Escherichia coli in drinking water.用于饮用水中大肠杆菌现场检测的常温培养
J Appl Microbiol. 2011 Apr;110(4):915-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04940.x.
5
Enzymatic substrates in microbiology.微生物学中的酶底物
J Microbiol Methods. 2009 Nov;79(2):139-55. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
6
A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E. coli tests.十种美国环境保护局(USEPA)批准的总大肠菌群/大肠杆菌检测方法的比较。
J Water Health. 2007 Jun;5(2):267-82.
7
Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most probable number".通过“最大可能数”法估算细菌密度。
Biometrics. 1950 Jun;6(2):105-16.
8
Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches.饮用水中大肠菌群的检测与计数:当前方法与新兴技术
J Microbiol Methods. 2002 Mar;49(1):31-54. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00351-7.
9
Advances in the bacteriology of the coliform group: their suitability as markers of microbial water safety.大肠菌群细菌学的进展:它们作为微生物水安全性指标的适用性。
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:201-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.201.
10
New developments in chromogenic and fluorogenic culture media.显色和荧光培养基的新进展。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2000 Sep 25;60(2-3):205-18. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00312-3.