Centro de Investigación, DACS, Universidad Juarez Autónoma de Tabasco (UJAT), Villahermosa, Tabasco 86150, Mexico.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 May;9(5):1663-76. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9051663. Epub 2012 May 4.
The macronutrient component of diets is critical for metabolic control and insulin action. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high fat diets (HFDs) vs. high carbohydrate diets (HCDs) on metabolic control and insulin resistance in Wistar rats. Thirty animals divided into five groups (n = 6) were fed: (1) Control diet (CD); (2) High-saturated fat diet (HSFD); (3) High-unsaturated fat diet (HUFD); (4) High-digestible starch diet, (HDSD); and (5) High-resistant starch diet (HRSD) during eight weeks. HFDs and HCDs reduced weight gain in comparison with CD, however no statistical significance was reached. Calorie intake was similar in both HFDs and CD, but rats receiving HCDs showed higher calorie consumption than other groups, (p < 0.01). HRSD showed the lowest levels of serum and hepatic lipids. The HUFD induced the lowest fasting glycemia levels and HOMA-IR values. The HDSD group exhibited the highest insulin resistance and hepatic cholesterol content. In conclusion, HUFD exhibited the most beneficial effects on glycemic control meanwhile HRSD induced the highest reduction on lipid content and did not modify insulin sensitivity. In both groups, HFDs and HCDs, the diet constituents were more important factors than caloric intake for metabolic disturbance and insulin resistance.
饮食中的宏量营养素成分对于代谢控制和胰岛素作用至关重要。本研究旨在比较高脂肪饮食(HFD)与高碳水化合物饮食(HCD)对 Wistar 大鼠代谢控制和胰岛素抵抗的影响。将 30 只动物分为五组(每组 n = 6):(1)对照饮食(CD);(2)高饱和脂肪饮食(HSFD);(3)高不饱和脂肪饮食(HUFD);(4)高易消化淀粉饮食(HDSD);(5)高抗性淀粉饮食(HRSD),持续 8 周。与 CD 相比,HFD 和 HCD 均降低了体重增加,但无统计学意义。HFD 和 CD 的热量摄入相似,但摄入 HCD 的大鼠比其他组消耗更多的热量,(p < 0.01)。HRSD 显示出最低的血清和肝脏脂质水平。HUFD 诱导的空腹血糖水平和 HOMA-IR 值最低。HDSD 组表现出最高的胰岛素抵抗和肝脏胆固醇含量。总之,HUFD 对血糖控制具有最有益的影响,而 HRSD 则使脂质含量降低最多,且不改变胰岛素敏感性。在 HFD 和 HCD 两组中,饮食成分比热量摄入更重要,是代谢紊乱和胰岛素抵抗的重要因素。