Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA.
J Rural Health. 2012 Summer;28(3):306-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00402.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
To determine the effect of common components of primary care-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening interventions on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) completion within rural and urban community clinics, including: (1) physician's spoken recommendation, (2) providing information or education about FOBTs, and (3) physician providing the FOBT kit; to determine the relative effect of these interventions; and to compare the effect of each intervention between rural and urban clinics.
We conducted structured interviews with patients aged 50 years and over receiving care at community clinics that were noncompliant with CRC screening. Self-report of ever receiving a physician's recommendation for screening, FOBT information or education, physician providing an FOBT kit, and FOBT completion were collected.
Participants included 849 screening-eligible adults; 77% were female and 68% were African American. The median age was 57; 33% lacked a high school diploma and 51% had low literacy. In multivariable analysis, all services were predictive of rural participants completing screening (physician recommendation: P = .002; FOBT education: P = .001; physician giving FOBT kit: P < .0001). In urban clinics, only physician giving the kit predicted FOBT completion (P < .0001). Compared to urban patients, rural patients showed a stronger relationship between FOBT completion and receiving a physician recommendation (risk ratio [RR]: 5.3 vs. 2.1; P = .0001), receiving information or education on FOBTs (RR: 3.8 vs 1.9; P = .0002), or receiving an FOBT kit from their physician (RR: 22.3 vs. 10.1; P = .035).
Participants who receive an FOBT kit from their physician are more likely to complete screening.
确定初级保健为基础的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查干预措施的常见组成部分对农村和城市社区诊所中粪便潜血试验(FOBT)完成情况的影响,包括:(1)医生的口头建议,(2)提供有关 FOBT 的信息或教育,以及(3)医生提供 FOBT 试剂盒;确定这些干预措施的相对效果;并比较农村和城市诊所中每种干预措施的效果。
我们对在不符合 CRC 筛查标准的社区诊所接受治疗的年龄在 50 岁及以上的患者进行了结构访谈。收集了曾经接受过医生筛查建议、FOBT 信息或教育、医生提供 FOBT 试剂盒以及 FOBT 完成情况的自我报告。
参与者包括 849 名符合筛查条件的成年人;77%为女性,68%为非裔美国人。中位数年龄为 57 岁;33%没有高中文凭,51%的人读写能力较低。在多变量分析中,所有服务均预测农村参与者完成了筛查(医生建议:P=0.002;FOBT 教育:P=0.001;医生提供 FOBT 试剂盒:P<0.0001)。在城市诊所中,只有医生提供试剂盒可预测 FOBT 完成情况(P<0.0001)。与城市患者相比,农村患者的 FOBT 完成情况与接受医生建议之间的关系更强(风险比 [RR]:5.3 比 2.1;P=0.0001),接受有关 FOBT 的信息或教育(RR:3.8 比 1.9;P=0.0002)或从医生那里获得 FOBT 试剂盒(RR:22.3 比 10.1;P=0.035)。
从医生那里获得 FOBT 试剂盒的参与者更有可能完成筛查。