Davis Terry C, Morris James, Rademaker Alfred, Ferguson Laurie Anne, Arnold Connie L
Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA.
Department of Preventive Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
J Womens Health Issues Care. 2017;6(6). doi: 10.4172/2325-9795.1000292. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Rural women lag rural men and urban women in colon cancer (CRC) screening completion.
To identify rural female patients' knowledge, beliefs barriers, self-efficacy, prior recommendation and completion of CRC screening using an FOBT and to compare these factors by health literacy (HL) level.
This descriptive study was conducted between 2015 and 2016 in 4 rural community clinics in south Louisiana. Patients overdue for screening were given a structured interview by a research assistant.
339 women were enrolled, mean age 58.5, 32% had limited HL, 66% were African American. Most (91.7%) had heard of CRC, yet only 71% knew of any CRC screening tests. Women with adequate HL had greater knowledge of specific tests than those with limited HL (78.4% vs 56.6%, p<0.001). Only 25.7% had been given information on CRC testing; those with adequate HL were more likely to have received information (30.1% vs 16.8%; p=0.017). Most women (93.2%) indicated they would want to know if they had CRC, while 72.2% reported a provider had recommended CRC screening. Only 24.9% said a healthcare provider had ever given them an FOBT or that they had ever completed an FOBT (22.7%). There were no differences in women's report of recommendation or completion by HL level.Self-efficacy for completing an FOBT was high; over 90% indicated they could get an FOBT, complete it and mail results to the lab. Level of confidence did not vary by literacy. Three of the four barrier items varied by HL with women with low HL being more likely to fear doing an FOBT because they thought FOBT instructions would be confusing (p=0.002), doing the test would be embarrassing (p=0.025) or messy (p=0.057).
Rural women are receptive to CRC screening and view FOBTs as effective. Rural community clinics need to provide low cost FOBTs with literacy, gender and culturally appropriate information.
农村女性在结肠癌(CRC)筛查完成率方面落后于农村男性和城市女性。
使用粪便潜血试验(FOBT)确定农村女性患者对CRC筛查的知识、信念障碍、自我效能感、既往推荐情况及完成情况,并按健康素养(HL)水平比较这些因素。
2015年至2016年在路易斯安那州南部的4家农村社区诊所开展了这项描述性研究。研究助理对逾期未进行筛查的患者进行了结构化访谈。
共纳入339名女性,平均年龄58.5岁,32%的女性健康素养有限,66%为非裔美国人。大多数(91.7%)听说过CRC,但只有71%知道任何CRC筛查检测方法。健康素养充足的女性比健康素养有限的女性对特定检测方法的了解更多(78.4%对56.6%,p<0.001)。只有25.7%的女性获得过关于CRC检测的信息;健康素养充足的女性更有可能收到过相关信息(30.1%对16.8%;p=0.017)。大多数女性(93.2%)表示她们想知道自己是否患有CRC,而72.2%的女性报告称有医疗服务提供者推荐过CRC筛查。只有24.9%的女性表示医疗服务提供者曾给过她们FOBT检测,或者她们曾完成过FOBT检测(22.7%)。不同HL水平的女性在推荐或完成情况的报告方面没有差异。完成FOBT检测的自我效能感较高;超过90%的女性表示她们可以获取FOBT检测、完成检测并将结果邮寄给实验室。信心水平不因识字能力而异。四个障碍项目中的三个因HL水平而异,HL水平较低的女性更有可能因认为FOBT检测说明会令人困惑(p=0.002)、进行检测会尴尬(p=0.025)或脏乱(p=0.057)而害怕进行FOBT检测。
农村女性接受CRC筛查,并认为FOBT检测有效。农村社区诊所需要提供低成本的FOBT检测,并提供具备识字能力、性别和文化适宜性的信息。