European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Chemical Assessment and Testing, via E. Fermi 1, 21027 (VA), Italy.
Environ Health. 2012 Jun 28;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S18.
The current paradigm for the assessment of the health risk of chemical substances focuses primarily on the effects of individual substances for determining the doses of toxicological concern in order to inform appropriately the regulatory process. These policy instruments place varying requirements on health and safety data of chemicals in the environment. REACH focuses on safety of individual substances; yet all the other facets of public health policy that relate to chemical stressors put emphasis on the effects of combined exposure to mixtures of chemical and physical agents. This emphasis brings about methodological problems linked to the complexity of the respective exposure pathways; the effect (more complex than simple additivity) of mixtures (the so-called 'cocktail effect'); dose extrapolation, i.e. the extrapolation of the validity of dose-response data to dose ranges that extend beyond the levels used for the derivation of the original dose-response relationship; the integrated use of toxicity data across species (including human clinical, epidemiological and biomonitoring data); and variation in inter-individual susceptibility associated with both genetic and environmental factors.
In this paper we give an overview of the main methodologies available today to estimate the human health risk of environmental chemical mixtures, ranging from dose addition to independent action, and from ignoring interactions among the mixture constituents to modelling their biological fate taking into account the biochemical interactions affecting both internal exposure and the toxic potency of the mixture.
We discuss their applicability, possible options available to policy makers and the difficulties and potential pitfalls in implementing these methodologies in the frame of the currently existing policy framework in the European Union. Finally, we suggest a pragmatic solution for policy/regulatory action that would facilitate the evaluation of the health effects of chemical mixtures in the environment and consumer products.
One universally applicable methodology does not yet exist. Therefore, a pragmatic, tiered approach to regulatory risk assessment of chemical mixtures is suggested, encompassing (a) the use of dose addition to calculate a hazard index that takes into account interactions among mixture components; and (b) the use of the connectivity approach in data-rich situations to integrate mechanistic knowledge at different scales of biological organization.
目前,化学物质健康风险评估的范式主要侧重于评估单个物质的影响,以确定毒理学关注剂量,从而为监管过程提供信息。这些政策工具对环境中化学物质的健康和安全数据提出了不同的要求。REACH 重点关注单个物质的安全性;然而,与化学应激物相关的所有其他公共卫生政策方面都强调了对化学和物理因素混合物的综合暴露的影响。这种强调带来了与各自暴露途径的复杂性相关的方法学问题;混合物的影响(比简单加和更复杂)(所谓的“鸡尾酒效应”);剂量外推,即剂量-反应数据有效性的外推,即外推到超出用于推导原始剂量-反应关系的剂量范围;跨物种(包括人类临床、流行病学和生物监测数据)毒性数据的综合利用;以及与遗传和环境因素相关的个体间易感性的差异。
在本文中,我们概述了当今可用的主要方法,以估计环境化学混合物对人类健康的风险,范围从剂量相加到独立作用,从忽略混合物成分之间的相互作用到建模其生物命运,同时考虑影响内部暴露和混合物毒性的生化相互作用。
我们讨论了它们的适用性、政策制定者可能的选择以及在欧盟现行政策框架下实施这些方法的困难和潜在陷阱。最后,我们提出了一种实用的解决方案,以促进政策/监管行动,评估环境和消费产品中化学混合物的健康影响。
目前还没有一种普遍适用的方法。因此,建议采用一种实用的、分层的方法来评估化学混合物的监管风险,包括 (a) 使用剂量相加来计算危险指数,该指数考虑了混合物成分之间的相互作用;以及 (b) 在数据丰富的情况下使用连接性方法,将不同生物组织层次的机制知识整合在一起。