DeSouza Joseph F X, Ovaysikia Shima, Pynn Laura
Department of Psychology, Centre for Vision Research, York University.
J Vis Exp. 2012 Jun 20(64):3237. doi: 10.3791/3237.
The aim of this methods paper is to describe how to implement a neuroimaging technique to examine complementary brain processes engaged by two similar tasks. Participants' behavior during task performance in an fMRI scanner can then be correlated to the brain activity using the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal. We measure behavior to be able to sort correct trials, where the subject performed the task correctly and then be able to examine the brain signals related to correct performance. Conversely, if subjects do not perform the task correctly, and these trials are included in the same analysis with the correct trials we would introduce trials that were not only for correct performance. Thus, in many cases these errors can be used themselves to then correlate brain activity to them. We describe two complementary tasks that are used in our lab to examine the brain during suppression of an automatic responses: the stroop(1) and anti-saccade tasks. The emotional stroop paradigm instructs participants to either report the superimposed emotional 'word' across the affective faces or the facial 'expressions' of the face stimuli(1,2). When the word and the facial expression refer to different emotions, a conflict between what must be said and what is automatically read occurs. The participant has to resolve the conflict between two simultaneously competing processes of word reading and facial expression. Our urge to read out a word leads to strong 'stimulus-response (SR)' associations; hence inhibiting these strong SR's is difficult and participants are prone to making errors. Overcoming this conflict and directing attention away from the face or the word requires the subject to inhibit bottom up processes which typically directs attention to the more salient stimulus. Similarly, in the anti-saccade task(3,4,5,6), where an instruction cue is used to direct only attention to a peripheral stimulus location but then the eye movement is made to the mirror opposite position. Yet again we measure behavior by recording the eye movements of participants which allows for the sorting of the behavioral responses into correct and error trials(7) which then can be correlated to brain activity. Neuroimaging now allows researchers to measure different behaviors of correct and error trials that are indicative of different cognitive processes and pinpoint the different neural networks involved.
本方法论文的目的是描述如何实施一种神经成像技术,以检查两个相似任务所涉及的互补脑过程。然后,使用血氧水平依赖信号,可以将参与者在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中执行任务期间的行为与大脑活动相关联。我们测量行为,以便能够对正确试验进行分类,即受试者正确执行任务的试验,然后能够检查与正确执行相关的脑信号。相反,如果受试者没有正确执行任务,并且将这些试验与正确试验包含在同一分析中,我们就会引入不仅针对正确执行的试验。因此,在许多情况下,这些错误本身可以用于将大脑活动与它们相关联。我们描述了在我们实验室中用于在抑制自动反应期间检查大脑的两个互补任务:斯特鲁普任务(1)和反眼跳任务。情绪斯特鲁普范式指示参与者报告跨情感面孔叠加的情感“单词”或面部刺激的面部“表情”(1,2)。当单词和面部表情指代不同情绪时,在必须说出的内容和自动读取的内容之间会出现冲突。参与者必须解决单词阅读和面部表情这两个同时竞争的过程之间的冲突。我们读出单词的冲动会导致强烈的“刺激 - 反应(SR)”关联;因此,抑制这些强烈的SR关联很困难,参与者容易出错。克服这种冲突并将注意力从面部或单词上转移开,需要受试者抑制通常将注意力引向更突出刺激的自下而上的过程。同样,在反眼跳任务中(3,4,5,6),使用指令线索仅将注意力引导到外周刺激位置,但随后眼睛移动到镜像相反位置。我们再次通过记录参与者的眼动来测量行为,这允许将行为反应分类为正确和错误试验(7),然后可以将其与大脑活动相关联。神经成像现在允许研究人员测量正确和错误试验的不同行为,这些行为指示不同的认知过程,并确定所涉及的不同神经网络。