Dittami Gregory M, Sethi Manju, Rabbitt Richard D, Ayliffe H Edward
Orflo Technologies.
J Vis Exp. 2012 Jun 21(64):3842. doi: 10.3791/3842.
Particle and cell counting is used for a variety of applications including routine cell culture, hematological analysis, and industrial controls(1-5). A critical breakthrough in cell/particle counting technologies was the development of the Coulter technique by Wallace Coulter over 50 years ago. The technique involves the application of an electric field across a micron-sized aperture and hydrodynamically focusing single particles through the aperture. The resulting occlusion of the aperture by the particles yields a measurable change in electric impedance that can be directly and precisely correlated to cell size/volume. The recognition of the approach as the benchmark in cell/particle counting stems from the extraordinary precision and accuracy of its particle sizing and counts, particularly as compared to manual and imaging based technologies (accuracies on the order of 98% for Coulter counters versus 75-80% for manual and vision-based systems). This can be attributed to the fact that, unlike imaging-based approaches to cell counting, the Coulter Technique makes a true three-dimensional (3-D) measurement of cells/particles which dramatically reduces count interference from debris and clustering by calculating precise volumetric information about the cells/particles. Overall this provides a means for enumerating and sizing cells in a more accurate, less tedious, less time-consuming, and less subjective means than other counting techniques(6). Despite the prominence of the Coulter technique in cell counting, its widespread use in routine biological studies has been prohibitive due to the cost and size of traditional instruments. Although a less expensive Coulter-based instrument has been produced, it has limitations as compared to its more expensive counterparts in the correction for "coincidence events" in which two or more cells pass through the aperture and are measured simultaneously. Another limitation with existing Coulter technologies is the lack of metrics on the overall health of cell samples. Consequently, additional techniques must often be used in conjunction with Coulter counting to assess cell viability. This extends experimental setup time and cost since the traditional methods of viability assessment require cell staining and/or use of expensive and cumbersome equipment such as a flow cytometer. The Moxi Z mini automated cell counter, described here, is an ultra-small benchtop instrument that combines the accuracy of the Coulter Principle with a thin-film sensor technology to enable precise sizing and counting of particles ranging from 3-25 microns, depending on the cell counting cassette used. The M type cassette can be used to count particles from with average diameters of 4 - 25 microns (dynamic range 2 - 34 microns), and the Type S cassette can be used to count particles with and average diameter of 3 - 20 microns (dynamic range 2 - 26 microns). Since the system uses a volumetric measurement method, the 4-25 microns corresponds to a cell volume range of 34 - 8,180 fL and the 3 - 20 microns corresponds to a cell volume range of 14 - 4200 fL, which is relevant when non-spherical particles are being measured. To perform mammalian cell counts using the Moxi Z, the cells to be counted are first diluted with ORFLO or similar diluent. A cell counting cassette is inserted into the instrument, and the sample is loaded into the port of the cassette. Thousands of cells are pulled, single-file through a "Cell Sensing Zone" (CSZ) in the thin-film membrane over 8-15 seconds. Following the run, the instrument uses proprietary curve-fitting in conjunction with a proprietary software algorithm to provide coincidence event correction along with an assessment of overall culture health by determining the ratio of the number of cells in the population of interest to the total number of particles. The total particle counts include shrunken and broken down dead cells, as well as other debris and contaminants. The results are presented in histogram format with an automatic curve fit, with gates that can be adjusted manually as needed. Ultimately, the Moxi Z enables counting with a precision and accuracy comparable to a Coulter Z2, the current gold standard, while providing additional culture health information. Furthermore it achieves these results in less time, with a smaller footprint, with significantly easier operation and maintenance, and at a fraction of the cost of comparable technologies.
颗粒和细胞计数被用于多种应用,包括常规细胞培养、血液学分析和工业控制(1 - 5)。50多年前,华莱士·库尔特开发的库尔特技术是细胞/颗粒计数技术的一项重大突破。该技术涉及在微米级孔径上施加电场,并通过流体动力学将单个颗粒聚焦通过该孔径。颗粒导致孔径被阻塞,从而产生可测量的电阻抗变化,该变化可直接且精确地与细胞大小/体积相关联。该方法被公认为细胞/颗粒计数的基准,源于其在颗粒大小测量和计数方面的极高精度和准确性,特别是与手动和基于成像的技术相比(库尔特计数器的准确率约为98%,而手动和基于视觉的系统为75 - 80%)。这可以归因于这样一个事实,与基于成像的细胞计数方法不同,库尔特技术对细胞/颗粒进行真正的三维(3 - D)测量,通过计算细胞/颗粒的精确体积信息,极大地减少了来自碎片和聚集的计数干扰。总体而言,这提供了一种比其他计数技术更准确、更轻松、更省时且更客观的细胞计数和大小测量方法(6)。尽管库尔特技术在细胞计数方面很突出,但由于传统仪器的成本和尺寸,其在常规生物学研究中的广泛应用受到限制。虽然已经生产出一种成本较低的基于库尔特原理的仪器,但与更昂贵的同类仪器相比,它在“重合事件”校正方面存在局限性,在重合事件中,两个或更多细胞同时通过孔径并被测量。现有库尔特技术的另一个局限性是缺乏关于细胞样本整体健康状况的指标。因此,通常必须结合使用其他技术与库尔特计数来评估细胞活力。这延长了实验设置时间和成本,因为传统的活力评估方法需要细胞染色和/或使用昂贵且笨重的设备,如流式细胞仪。本文所述的Moxi Z mini自动细胞计数器是一种超小型台式仪器,它将库尔特原理的准确性与薄膜传感器技术相结合,能够根据所使用的细胞计数盒精确测量和计数3 - 25微米范围内的颗粒。M型盒可用于计数平均直径为4 - 25微米(动态范围2 - 34微米)的颗粒,S型盒可用于计数平均直径为3 - 20微米(动态范围2 - 26微米)的颗粒。由于该系统采用体积测量方法,4 - 25微米对应于34 - 8180飞升的细胞体积范围,3 - 20微米对应于14 - 4200飞升的细胞体积范围,这在测量非球形颗粒时很重要。要使用Moxi Z进行哺乳动物细胞计数,首先要用ORFLO或类似的稀释剂稀释待计数的细胞。将细胞计数盒插入仪器,然后将样品加载到盒的端口。数千个细胞在8 - 15秒内单个通过薄膜中的“细胞传感区”(CSZ)。运行后,仪器使用专有曲线拟合结合专有软件算法,进行重合事件校正,并通过确定感兴趣群体中的细胞数量与总颗粒数量的比率来评估整体培养健康状况。总颗粒计数包括萎缩和破碎的死细胞以及其他碎片和污染物。结果以带有自动曲线拟合的直方图形式呈现,带有可根据需要手动调整的门控。最终,Moxi Z能够实现与当前金标准库尔特Z2相当的精度和准确性进行计数,同时提供额外的培养健康信息。此外,它能在更短的时间内、占用更小的空间、操作和维护明显更简便的情况下实现这些结果,且成本仅为同类技术的一小部分。