Health and Human Rights Programme, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Jun 15;14(1):E88-105.
We draw on the experience of a Learning Network for Health and Human Rights (LN) involving collaboration between academic institutions and civil society organizations in the Western Cape, South Africa, aimed at identifying and disseminating best practice related to the right to health. The LN's work in materials development, participatory research, training and capacity-building for action, and advocacy for intervention illustrates important lessons for human rights practice. These include (i) the importance of active translation of knowledge and awareness into action for rights to be made real; (ii) the potential tension arising from civil society action, which might relieve the state of its obligations by delivering services that should be the state's responsibility-and hence the importance of emphasizing civil society's role in holding services accountable in terms of the right to health; (iii) the role of civil society organizations in filling a gap related to obligations to promote rights; (iv) the critical importance of networking and solidarity for building civil society capacity to act for health rights. Evidence from evaluation of the LN is presented to support the argument that civil society can play a key role in bridging a gap between formal state commitment to creating a human rights culture and realizing services and policies that enable the most vulnerable members of society to advance their health. Through access to information and the creation of spaces, both for participation and as a safe environment in which learning can be turned into practice, the agency of those most affected by rights violations can be redressed. We argue that civil society agency is critical to such action.
我们借鉴了一个健康与人权学习网络(Learning Network for Health and Human Rights,LN)的经验,该网络涉及南非西开普省学术机构和民间社会组织之间的合作,旨在确定和传播与健康权相关的最佳实践。LN 在材料开发、参与式研究、行动培训和能力建设以及倡导干预方面的工作为人权实践提供了重要的经验教训。这些经验教训包括:(i)将知识和意识积极转化为行动对于实现权利至关重要;(ii)民间社会行动可能会产生的潜在紧张局势,因为民间社会提供本应由国家承担的服务,从而减轻了国家的义务,因此强调民间社会在根据健康权追究服务提供者责任方面的作用非常重要;(iii)民间社会组织在填补促进权利义务方面的差距方面的作用;(iv)网络和团结在建设民间社会为健康权利采取行动的能力方面的关键作用。通过对 LN 的评估提供的证据支持了这样一种观点,即民间社会可以在正式的国家承诺创造人权文化与实现服务和政策之间架起桥梁,使社会中最弱势群体能够促进其健康方面发挥关键作用。通过获取信息和创造空间,无论是为了参与,还是为了创造一个可以将学习转化为实践的安全环境,都可以纠正那些最受侵犯权利影响的人的代理机构。我们认为,民间社会的代理机构对于这种行动至关重要。