Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Plant Cell. 2012 Jul;24(7):2710-7. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100115. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
It has been hypothesized that reproductive isolation should facilitate evolution under domestication. However, a systematic comparison of reproductive barrier strength between crops and their progenitors has not been conducted to test this hypothesis. Here, we present a systematic survey of reproductive barriers between 32 economically important crop species and their progenitors to better understand the role of reproductive isolation during the domestication process. We took a conservative approach, avoiding those types of reproductive isolation that are poorly known for these taxa (e.g., differences in flowering time). We show that the majority of crops surveyed are isolated from their progenitors by one or more reproductive barriers, despite the fact that the most important reproductive barrier in natural systems, geographical isolation, was absent, at least in the initial stages of domestication for most species. Thus, barriers to reproduction between crops and wild relatives are closely associated with domestication and may facilitate it, thereby raising the question whether reproductive isolation could be viewed as a long-overlooked "domestication trait." Some of the reproductive barriers observed (e.g., polyploidy and uniparental reproduction), however, may have been favored for reasons other than, or in addition to, their effects on gene flow.
有人假设生殖隔离应该有助于驯化下的进化。然而,尚未对作物与其祖先之间的生殖障碍强度进行系统比较,以检验这一假设。在这里,我们对 32 种经济上重要的作物物种与其祖先之间的生殖障碍进行了系统调查,以更好地了解生殖隔离在驯化过程中的作用。我们采取了一种保守的方法,避免了这些分类群中生殖隔离的那些类型(例如,开花时间的差异)。我们表明,尽管在自然系统中最重要的生殖隔离,地理隔离,至少在大多数物种的驯化初期是不存在的,但调查的大多数作物与它们的祖先都被一种或多种生殖障碍隔离。因此,作物和野生亲缘种之间的繁殖障碍与驯化密切相关,并可能促进其发生,这就提出了一个问题,即生殖隔离是否可以被视为一个长期被忽视的“驯化特征”。然而,观察到的一些生殖障碍(例如,多倍体和单亲生殖)可能是由于除了对基因流的影响之外的其他原因而受到青睐的。