Hoonakker Peter, Carayon Pascale, Gurses Ayse, Brown Roger, McGuire Kerry, Khunlertkit Adjhaporn, Walker James M
Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement and Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2011;1(2):131-143. doi: 10.1080/19488300.2011.609524. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
High workload of nurses in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) has been identified as a major patient safety and worker stress problem. However, relative little attention has been dedicated to the measurement of workload in healthcare. The objectives of this study are to describe and examine several methods to measure workload of ICU nurses. We then focus on the measurement of ICU nurses' workload using a subjective rating instrument: the NASA TLX.We conducted secondary data analysis on data from two, multi-side, cross-sectional questionnaire studies to examine several instruments to measure ICU nurses' workload. The combined database contains the data from 757 ICU nurses in 8 hospitals and 21 ICUs.Results show that the different methods to measure workload of ICU nurses, such as patient-based and operator-based workload, are only moderately correlated, or not correlated at all. Results show further that among the operator-based instruments, the NASA TLX is the most reliable and valid questionnaire to measure workload and that NASA TLX can be used in a healthcare setting. Managers of hospitals and ICUs can benefit from the results of this research as it provides benchmark data on workload experienced by nurses in a variety of ICUs.
重症监护病房(ICU)护士的高工作量已被认定为一个主要的患者安全和工作人员压力问题。然而,医疗保健领域中对工作量测量的关注相对较少。本研究的目的是描述和检验几种测量ICU护士工作量的方法。然后,我们重点使用一种主观评分工具——美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA TLX)来测量ICU护士的工作量。我们对两项多地点横断面问卷调查研究的数据进行了二次数据分析,以检验几种测量ICU护士工作量的工具。合并后的数据库包含来自8家医院和21个ICU的757名ICU护士的数据。结果表明,测量ICU护士工作量的不同方法,如基于患者的工作量和基于操作人员的工作量,仅具有中等相关性,或根本不相关。结果还表明,在基于操作人员的工具中,NASA TLX是测量工作量最可靠、最有效的问卷,并且NASA TLX可用于医疗环境。医院和ICU的管理人员可以从这项研究的结果中受益,因为它提供了关于各类ICU护士所经历工作量的基准数据。