• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Treatment of Patients Aged 75 Years and over with Esophageal Cancer.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗75岁及以上老年食管癌患者
ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012;2012:671324. doi: 10.5402/2012/671324. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
2
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效及安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3905-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5421-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗起源于固有肌层的食管黏膜下肿瘤。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.039. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
4
Safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophagogastric junction cancer.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管胃结合部癌的安全性、有效性及长期疗效。
Gastric Cancer. 2013 Apr;16(2):147-54. doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0162-5. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
5
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric tube cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗胃管癌的疗效及安全性:一项多中心回顾性研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 21;27(11):1043-1054. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i11.1043.
6
Comparison between tunneling and standard endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of large esophageal superficial neoplasm.隧道技术与标准内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管巨大浅表肿瘤的比较。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Oct-Dec;82(4):469-474.
7
The effect of scissor-type versus non-scissor-type knives on the technical outcomes in endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.剪刀型与非剪刀型刀在内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌技术效果中的作用:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz077.
8
[Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].[国内单中心早期胃癌手术切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):190-195.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife for superficial esophageal neoplasia. Is it safe for elderly patients?内镜黏膜下剥离术联合小口径透明帽和弹性刀治疗食管表浅肿瘤,老年患者安全吗?
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2110-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0907-3. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for foregut neuroendocrine tumors: an initial study.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗上消化道神经内分泌肿瘤:初步研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 28;18(40):5799-806. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5799.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of age and comorbidities on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes: Large multicenter study in a Western cohort.年龄和合并症对结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术结果的影响:西方队列中的大型多中心研究
Endosc Int Open. 2025 May 12;13:a25681366. doi: 10.1055/a-2568-1366. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients aged over 80 years.80岁以上食管鳞状细胞癌患者的临床结局
Korean J Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(2):230-242. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2024.201. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Older Patients Is Safe and Feasible: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in the United States.老年患者的食管内镜黏膜下剥离术是安全可行的:美国一项回顾性单中心队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 30;13(1):228. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010228.
4
Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.老年食管鳞癌患者的管理。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;52(8):816-824. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyac067.
5
Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Superficial Esophageal Cancer in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years.65岁及以上老年表浅食管癌患者的长期预后及预后因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 18;8:722141. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.722141. eCollection 2021.
6
Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.老年患者的食管癌:当前治疗选择与结果;系统评价与汇总分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;13(9):2104. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092104.
7
Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the treatment strategy and survival in elderly patients after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.高龄患者非治愈性内镜黏膜下剥离术后接受治疗策略和生存的 Charlson 合并症指数的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct;54(10):871-880. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01583-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Outcome of esophageal cancer in the elderly - systematic review of the literature.老年食管癌的治疗结果——文献系统综述
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Dec;12(4):341-349. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.72318. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
9
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效及安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3905-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5421-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients with superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤的疗效及安全性。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):242-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640615604780. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Aggressive endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper GI tract - Hook knife EMR method.上消化道内镜下黏膜切除术——钩刀内镜黏膜切除术方法
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2002 Jan;11(5-6):291-295. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2003.11873728.
2
Mediastinal emphysema after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: its prevalence and clinical significance.食管内镜黏膜下剥离术后纵隔气肿:其发生率及临床意义。
Dig Endosc. 2011 Jul;23(3):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01085.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
3
Pneumomediastinum is a frequent but minor complication during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.纵隔气肿是食管内镜黏膜下剥离术时常见但轻微的并发症。
Endoscopy. 2010 Jan;42(1):8-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215215. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
4
Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2003: based on data from 13 population-based cancer registries in the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project.2003年日本的癌症发病率及发病率:基于日本癌症发病率监测(MCIJ)项目中13个基于人群的癌症登记处的数据。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec;39(12):850-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp106. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
5
Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan.日本早期食管癌整块切除中电子病历与内镜下黏膜下剥离术的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Dec;68(6):1066-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1114. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
6
Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.内镜超声对食管癌的分期准确性:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar 14;14(10):1479-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1479.
7
Endoscopic ultrasound: accuracy in staging superficial carcinomas of the esophagus.内镜超声检查:对食管表浅癌分期的准确性
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.08.021.
8
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms.食管鳞状细胞瘤的内镜下黏膜下剥离术
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jun;4(6):688-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.024. Epub 2006 May 19.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌的内镜下黏膜剥离术
Chin J Dig Dis. 2005;6(3):119-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00206.x.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer.早期食管癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jul;3(7 Suppl 1):S67-70. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00291-0.

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗75岁及以上老年食管癌患者

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Treatment of Patients Aged 75 Years and over with Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

Kikuchi Osamu, Mouri Hirokazu, Matsueda Kazuhiro, Yamamoto Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan.

出版信息

ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012;2012:671324. doi: 10.5402/2012/671324. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

DOI:10.5402/2012/671324
PMID:22778977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3385636/
Abstract

Background. Although many reports concerning the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal cancer have been published, the feasibility of ESD in elderly patients has not been reported. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD for treating early esophageal cancer in elderly patients. Methods. A total of 62 cases (52 men, 10 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 66.5 ± 10.5 years) for which the first resection (first treatment) of esophageal cancer was performed by ESD were identified from 77 consecutive esophageal epithelial cancers in 67 patients treated at our institution from January 2005 to March 2011. Patient characteristics, clinical findings, and outcomes were retrospectively assessed for patients separated into older (aged 75 years and older) and younger (aged under 75 years) groups. Results. No significant differences in specimen size, procedure time, median length of the hospital stay (8 versus 9 days; P = 0.252) or procedure-associated complications (8% versus 27%; P = 0.264) were observed between the older (n = 13) and younger (n = 49) groups. Lesions were completely resected in 12 patients and 44 patients, in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the curative resection rate was 77% and 59%, respectively. There were no deaths attributable to procedure-associated complications. Conclusions. ESD is an effective treatment for early esophageal cancer and is well tolerated by elderly patients.

摘要

背景。尽管已经发表了许多关于内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)用于食管癌治疗的报告,但ESD在老年患者中的可行性尚未见报道。因此,我们评估了ESD治疗老年患者早期食管癌的疗效和安全性。方法。从2005年1月至2011年3月在我院接受治疗的67例患者的77例连续性食管上皮癌中,确定了62例(52例男性,10例女性;平均年龄±标准差,66.5±10.5岁)首次通过ESD进行食管癌切除(首次治疗)的病例。对分为老年组(75岁及以上)和年轻组(75岁以下)的患者的患者特征、临床发现和结局进行回顾性评估。结果。老年组(n = 13)和年轻组(n = 49)之间在标本大小、手术时间、中位住院时间(8天对9天;P = 0.252)或手术相关并发症(8%对27%;P = 0.264)方面未观察到显著差异。年轻组和老年组分别有12例和44例患者病变完全切除,根治性切除率分别为77%和59%。没有因手术相关并发症导致的死亡。结论。ESD是治疗早期食管癌的有效方法,老年患者耐受性良好。