文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Schneeweiss Sebastian, Gagne Joshua J, Patrick Amanda R, Choudhry Niteesh K, Avorn Jerry

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):480-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965988. Epub 2012 Jul 10.


DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965988
PMID:22787066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3471365/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran, an oral thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, oral factor Xa inhibitors, have been found to be safe and effective in reducing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of the 3 new agents based on data from their published warfarin-controlled randomized trials, using the method of adjusted indirect comparisons. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included findings from 44 535 patients enrolled in 3 trials of the efficacy of dabigatran (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy [RELY]), apixaban (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation [ARISTOTLE]), and rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation [ROCKET-AF]), each compared with warfarin. The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism; the safety end point we studied was major hemorrhage. To address a lack of comparability between trial populations caused by the restriction of ROCKET-AF to high-risk patients, we conducted a subgroup analysis in patients with a CHADS(2) score ≥3. We found no statistically significant efficacy differences among the 3 drugs, although apixaban and dabigatran were numerically superior to rivaroxaban. Apixaban produced significantly fewer major hemorrhages than dabigatran and rivaroxaban. CONCLUSIONS: An indirect comparison of new anticoagulants based on existing trial data indicates that in patients with a CHADS(2) score ≥3 dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban 5 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg resulted in statistically similar rates of stroke and systemic embolism, but apixaban had a lower risk of major hemorrhage compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Until head-to-head trials or large-scale observational studies that reflect routine use of these agents are available, such adjusted indirect comparisons based on trial data are one tool to guide initial therapeutic choices.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012-7-1

[2]
An indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation.

Thromb Haemost. 2012-6-28

[3]
Indirect comparisons of new oral anticoagulant drugs for efficacy and safety when used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012-5-9

[4]
Comparison of efficacy and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation using network meta-analysis.

Int Angiol. 2012-8

[5]
Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Am J Cardiol. 2012-4-24

[6]
Novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: focus on apixaban.

Adv Ther. 2012-6-7

[7]
Efficacy and safety of edoxaban in comparison with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. An indirect comparison analysis.

Thromb Haemost. 2014-5-5

[8]
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus other new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Clin Ther. 2014-2-6

[9]
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in cardiovascular disease management: evidence and unanswered questions.

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014-4

[10]
ARISTOTLE RE-LYs on the ROCKET. What's new in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation?

Cardiol J. 2012

引用本文的文献

[1]
Impact of patient selection in clinical trials: application of ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE criteria in GARFIELD-AF.

Open Heart. 2024-7-1

[2]
Multi-stage optimal dynamic treatment regimes for survival outcomes with dependent censoring.

Biometrika. 2022-8-13

[3]
Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin with high time in therapeutic range in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023-4

[4]
Using primary care data to assess comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the UK: an observational cohort study.

BMJ Open. 2022-10-17

[5]
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Prior Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023-12

[6]
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct acting oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021-8

[7]
Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study.

BMJ Open. 2019-5-5

[8]
Real-world adherence for direct oral anticoagulants in a newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation cohort: does the dosing interval matter?

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019-3-19

[9]
Assessment of Outcomes of Treatment With Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis.

JAMA Netw Open. 2018-9-7

[10]
Comparative safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation in clinical practice in Scotland.

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018-12-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Indirect comparisons of new oral anticoagulant drugs for efficacy and safety when used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012-5-9

[2]
Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011-11-2

[3]
Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

N Engl J Med. 2011-8-27

[4]
Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study.

BMJ. 2011-8-16

[5]
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

N Engl J Med. 2011-8-10

[6]
Availability of comparative efficacy data at the time of drug approval in the United States.

JAMA. 2011-5-4

[7]
Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial.

N Engl J Med. 2010-11-4

[8]
Rivaroxaban-once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation: rationale and design of the ROCKET AF study.

Am Heart J. 2010-3

[9]
Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

N Engl J Med. 2009-9-17

[10]
Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索