Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Energiekonversion, Stiftstrasse 34-36, Mülheim a.d. Ruhr 45470, Germany.
Inorg Chem. 2012 Aug 6;51(15):8617-28. doi: 10.1021/ic3013766. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
Understanding the catalytic process of the heterolytic splitting and formation of molecular hydrogen is one of the key topics for the development of a future hydrogen economy. With an interest in elucidating the enzymatic mechanism of the [Fe(2)(S(2)C(2)H(4)NH)(CN)(2)(CO)(2)(μ-CO)] active center uniquely found in [FeFe]hydrogenases, we present a detailed spectroscopic and theoretical analysis of its inorganic model Fe(2)(S(2)X)(CO)(3)(dppv)(PMe(3)) [dppv = cis-1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene] in two forms with S(2)X = ethanedithiolate (1edt) and azadithiolate (1adt). These complexes represent models for the oxidized mixed-valent Fe(I)Fe(II) state analogous to the active oxidized "H(ox)" state of the native H-cluster. For both complexes, the (31)P hyperfine interactions were determined by pulse electron paramagnetic resonance and electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) methods. For 1edt, the (57)Fe parameters were measured by electron spin-echo envelope modulation and Mössbauer spectroscopy, while for 1adt, (14)N and selected (1)H couplings could be obtained by ENDOR and hyperfine sublevel correlation spectroscopy. The spin density was found to be predominantly localized on the Fe(dppv) site. This spin distribution is different from that of the H-cluster, where both the spin and charge densities are delocalized over the two Fe centers. This difference is attributed to the influence of the "native" cubane subcluster that is lacking in the inorganic models. The degree and character of the unpaired spin delocalization was found to vary from 1edt, with an abiological dithiolate, to 1adt, which features the authentic cofactor. For 1adt, we find two (14)N signals, which are indicative for two possible isomers of the azadithiolate, demonstrating its high flexibility. All interaction parameters were also evaluated through density functional theory calculations at various levels.
了解分子氢异裂和形成的催化过程是未来氢能发展的关键课题之一。由于对阐明 [FeFe]氢化酶中独特存在的 [Fe(2)(S(2)C(2)H(4)NH)(CN)(2)(CO)(2)(μ-CO)]活性中心的酶促机制感兴趣,我们对其无机模型 Fe(2)(S(2)X)(CO)(3)(dppv)(PMe(3))(dppv = cis-1,2-双(二苯基膦基)乙烯)进行了详细的光谱和理论分析,其中 S(2)X = 乙二硫醇(1edt)和氮杂二硫醇(1adt)。这些配合物代表了氧化混合价态 Fe(I)Fe(II)状态的模型,类似于天然 H 簇的活性氧化“H(ox)”状态。对于这两个配合物,(31)P 超精细相互作用通过脉冲电子顺磁共振和电子核双共振(ENDOR)方法确定。对于 1edt,(57)Fe 参数通过电子自旋回波调制和穆斯堡尔光谱测量,而对于 1adt,可以通过 ENDOR 和超精细亚层相关光谱获得(14)N 和选定的(1)H 偶合。发现自旋密度主要定域在 Fe(dppv)位上。这种自旋分布与 H 簇不同,其中自旋和电荷密度都在两个 Fe 中心上离域。这种差异归因于缺乏在无机模型中的“天然”立方烷子簇的影响。发现未配对自旋离域的程度和特征从具有生物非硫醇的 1edt 变化到具有真实辅因子的 1adt。对于 1adt,我们发现了两个(14)N 信号,这表明氮杂二硫醇存在两种可能的异构体,证明其具有高度的灵活性。所有相互作用参数也通过各种水平的密度泛函理论计算进行了评估。