• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: introducing the CAT-PD project.计算机化自适应测评人格障碍:CAT-PD 项目介绍。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jul;93(4):380-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577475.
2
Implications for the Measurement of Psychopathy in the Using the Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder.在使用人格障碍计算机化自适应测验时对精神病态测量的影响。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Sep-Oct;101(5):468-480. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1475393. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
The Norwegian Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder-Static Form (CAT-PD-SF): Reliability, Factor Structure, and Relationships With Personality Functioning.挪威人格障碍静态形式计算机化自适应测验(CAT-PD-SF):信度、因子结构及与人格功能的关系。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):585-595. doi: 10.1177/1073191117749296. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
An Examination of the Reliability and Validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Traits Relevant to Personality Disorder-Static Form (CAT-PD-SF).人格障碍特质综合评定静态形式(CAT-PD-SF)的可靠性和有效性研究。
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1345-1357. doi: 10.1177/1073191120907957. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Toward a multidimensional model of personality disorder diagnosis: implications for DSM-5.迈向人格障碍诊断的多维模型:对 DSM-5 的启示。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jul;93(4):362-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577474.
6
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
7
A dimensional approach to assessing personality functioning: examining personality trait domains utilizing DSM-IV personality disorder criteria.一种评估人格功能的维度方法:利用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍标准检查人格特质领域。
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
8
Pathological personality traits can capture DSM-IV personality disorder types.病理性人格特质能够涵盖《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中的人格障碍类型。
Personal Disord. 2015 Jan;6(1):32-40. doi: 10.1037/per0000064. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of DSM-5 traits.DSM-5 特质的会聚、区别和效标效度。
Personal Disord. 2016 Oct;7(4):394-404. doi: 10.1037/per0000165. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
10
Structure of Pathological Personality Traits Through the Lens of the CAT-PD Model.通过 CAT-PD 模型透视病理性人格特质的结构。
Assessment. 2023 Oct;30(7):2276-2295. doi: 10.1177/10731911221143343. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
CAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting.CAT-PD和MMPI-3效度量表可检测模拟的过度报告和报告不足。
J Pers Assess. 2024 Dec 9:1-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430315.
2
MMPI-3 Assessment of Externalizing Psychopathology in Targeted Community and University Samples.MMPI-3对特定社区和大学样本中外显型精神病理学的评估。
Assessment. 2025 Oct;32(7):995-1007. doi: 10.1177/10731911241293939. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life.一项关于日常生活中去抑制作用和人际结果的探索性研究。
Personal Disord. 2024 Nov 18. doi: 10.1037/per0000707.
4
Pathological personality dimensions and neurobiological emotional reactivity.病理性人格维度与神经生物学情绪反应性
Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 15;54(13):1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001946.
5
Evidence for a vicious socioemotional cycle of negative emotions and interpersonal conflict.存在一个负面情绪和人际冲突的恶性循环的社会情绪证据。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Aug;92(8):479-492. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000891.
6
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorders and the alternative model: Prediction of naturalistically observed behavior, interpersonal functioning, and psychiatric symptoms, 1 year later.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版、人格障碍与替代模型:对一年后自然观察到的行为、人际功能和精神症状的预测
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):361-370. doi: 10.1037/per0000677. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
7
Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.个体在不同时间和刺激类型下对正性图像的显性注意偏好存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58987-8.
8
Validation of the structured interview section of the penn computerized adaptive test for neurocognitive and clinical psychopathology assessment (CAT GOASSESS).用于神经认知和临床精神病理学评估的宾夕法尼亚计算机自适应测试(CAT GOASSESS)结构化访谈部分的验证
Psychiatry Res. 2024 May;335:115862. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115862. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
Development and validation of the adaptive leadership behavior scale (ALBS).适应性领导行为量表(ALBS)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1149371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149371. eCollection 2023.
10
Precision behavioral phenotyping as a strategy for uncovering the biological correlates of psychopathology.精准行为表型分析作为揭示精神病理学生物学关联的一种策略。
Nat Ment Health. 2023 May;1(5):304-315. doi: 10.1038/s44220-023-00057-5. Epub 2023 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Contrasting prototypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathology: evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes, are robust.人格病理学分类中的对比原型和维度:维度而非原型具有稳健性的证据。
Psychol Med. 2011 Jun;41(6):1151-63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001650. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
3
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)开发并测试了其第一波成人自我报告健康结局项目库:2005-2008 年。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
4
Using clinician-rated five-factor model data to score the DSM-IV personality disorders.使用临床医生评定的五因素模型数据对 DSM-IV 人格障碍进行评分。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Jul;92(4):296-305. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.481984.
5
Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment.使用计算机自适应测试减轻心理健康评估负担。
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Apr;59(4):361-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.4.361.
6
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model.人格障碍分类中的板块构造理论:向维度模型的转变
Am Psychol. 2007 Feb-Mar;62(2):71-83. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71.
7
Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization.人格障碍的评估与诊断:长期存在的问题及一种新出现的概念重构
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:227-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200.
8
A prototype approach to personality disorder diagnosis.一种人格障碍诊断的原型方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):846-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.846.
9
Dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: relationships to functional impairment.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的维度表征:与功能损害的关系
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1919-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1919.
10
The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients.精神科门诊患者中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的患病率。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1911-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1911.

计算机化自适应测评人格障碍:CAT-PD 项目介绍。

Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: introducing the CAT-PD project.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2011 Jul;93(4):380-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577475.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2011.577475
PMID:22804677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3400119/
Abstract

Assessment of personality disorders (PD) has been hindered by reliance on the problematic categorical model embodied in the most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Model of Mental Disorders (DSM), lack of consensus among alternative dimensional models, and inefficient measurement methods. This article describes the rationale for and early results from a multiyear study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health that was designed to develop an integrative and comprehensive model and efficient measure of PD trait dimensions. To accomplish these goals, we are in the midst of a 5-phase project to develop and validate the model and measure. The results of Phase 1 of the project--which was focused on developing the PD traits to be assessed and the initial item pool--resulted in a candidate list of 59 PD traits and an initial item pool of 2,589 items. Data collection and structural analyses in community and patient samples will inform the ultimate structure of the measure, and computerized adaptive testing will permit efficient measurement of the resultant traits. The resultant Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder (CAT-PD) will be well positioned as a measure of the proposed DSM-5 PD traits. Implications for both applied and basic personality research are discussed.

摘要

人格障碍(PD)的评估受到了阻碍,原因是过分依赖于最新的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中所体现的有问题的分类模式、替代维度模型之间缺乏共识以及效率低下的测量方法。本文描述了由美国国立精神卫生研究所资助的一项多年研究的基本原理和早期结果,该研究旨在开发一种综合和全面的人格障碍特质维度模型和有效测量方法。为了实现这些目标,我们正在进行一个 5 阶段的项目,以开发和验证模型和测量方法。该项目的第 1 阶段的结果——专注于开发要评估的 PD 特质和初始项目池——产生了一个 59 个 PD 特质的候选列表和一个包含 2589 个项目的初始项目池。在社区和患者样本中的数据收集和结构分析将为该测量方法的最终结构提供信息,而计算机化自适应测试将允许对所得特质进行高效测量。由此产生的人格障碍计算机化自适应测试(CAT-PD)将成为测量 DSM-5 人格障碍特质的良好工具。本文还讨论了其对应用和基础人格研究的影响。