Tupler Tiffany, Levy Julie K, Sabshin Stephanie J, Tucker Sylvia J, Greiner Ellis C, Leutenegger Christian M
Maddie's Shelter Medicine Program, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012 Aug 1;241(3):338-43. doi: 10.2460/javma.241.3.338.
To determine the frequency of enteropathogens in dogs entering an animal shelter with normal feces or diarrhea.
Cross-sectional study.
100 dogs evaluated at an open-admission municipal animal shelter in Florida.
Fecal samples were collected within 24 hours after admission from 50 dogs with normal feces and 50 dogs with diarrhea. Feces were tested by fecal flotation, antigen testing, PCR assay, and electron microscopy for selected enteropathogens.
13 enteropathogens were identified. Dogs with diarrhea were significantly more likely to be infected with ≥ 1 enteropathogens (96%) than were dogs with normal feces (78%). Only Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin A gene was significantly more common in dogs with diarrhea (64%) than in dogs with normal feces (40%). Other enteropathogens identified in dogs with and without diarrhea included hookworms (58% and 48%, respectively), Giardia spp (22% and 16%, respectively), canine enteric coronavirus (2% and 18%, respectively), whipworms (12% and 8%, respectively), Cryptosporidium spp (12% and 2%, respectively), ascarids (8% and 8%, respectively), Salmonella spp (2% and 6%, respectively), Cystoisospora spp (2% and 4%, respectively), canine distemper virus (8% and 0%, respectively), Dipylidium caninum (2% and 2%, respectively), canine parvovirus (2% and 2%, respectively), and rotavirus (2% and 0%, respectively).
Dogs entered the shelter with a variety of enteropathogens, many of which are pathogenic or zoonotic. Most infections were not associated with diarrhea or any specific dog characteristics, making it difficult to predict the risk of infection for individual animals. Guidelines for preventive measures and empirical treatments that are logistically and financially feasible for use in shelters should be developed for control of the most common and important enteropathogens.
确定进入动物收容所的粪便正常或腹泻犬只中肠道病原体的感染率。
横断面研究。
对佛罗里达州一家开放式收容的市立动物收容所的100只犬进行评估。
在入院后24小时内,从50只粪便正常的犬和50只腹泻犬采集粪便样本。通过粪便漂浮法、抗原检测、聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测及电子显微镜检查对选定的肠道病原体进行检测。
共鉴定出13种肠道病原体。腹泻犬感染≥1种肠道病原体的可能性(96%)显著高于粪便正常的犬(78%)。仅产气荚膜梭菌肠毒素A基因在腹泻犬(64%)中比在粪便正常的犬(40%)中更常见。在有腹泻和无腹泻的犬中鉴定出的其他肠道病原体包括钩虫(分别为58%和48%)、贾第虫属(分别为22%和16%)、犬肠道冠状病毒(分别为2%和18%)、鞭虫(分别为12%和8%)、隐孢子虫属(分别为12%和2%)、蛔虫(分别为8%和8%)、沙门氏菌属(分别为鲜2%和6%)、等孢球虫属(分别为2%和4%)、犬瘟热病毒(分别为8%和0%)、犬复孔绦虫(分别为2%和2%)、犬细小病毒(分别为2%和2%)以及轮状病毒(分别为2%和0%)。
进入收容所的犬携带多种肠道病原体,其中许多具有致病性或人畜共患性。大多数感染与腹泻或任何特定犬的特征无关,这使得难以预测个体动物的感染风险。应制定在收容所后勤及经济上可行的预防措施和经验性治疗指南,以控制最常见和重要的肠道病原体。