Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1154-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0298-7.
Explicit memory is thought to be distinct from implicit memory. However, growing evidence has indicated that explicit familiarity-based recognition memory judgments rely on the same process that supports conceptual implicit memory. We tested this hypothesis by examining individual differences using a paradigm wherein we measured both familiarity and conceptual implicit memory within the same participants. In Experiments 1a and 1b, we examined recognition memory confidence ROCs and remember/know responses, respectively, to estimate recollection and familiarity, and used a free association task to measure conceptual implicit memory. The results demonstrated that, across participants, familiarity, but not recollection, was significantly correlated with conceptual priming. In contrast, in Experiment 2, utilizing a similar paradigm, a comparison of recognition memory ROCs and explicit associative cued-recall performance indicated that cued recall was related to both recollection and familiarity. These results are consistent with models assuming that familiarity-based recognition and conceptual implicit memory rely on similar underlying processes.
外显记忆被认为与内隐记忆不同。然而,越来越多的证据表明,基于熟悉度的外显识别记忆判断依赖于支持概念性内隐记忆的相同过程。我们通过使用一种范式来检验这一假设,该范式在同一参与者中同时测量熟悉度和概念性内隐记忆。在实验 1a 和 1b 中,我们分别通过识别记忆信心 ROC 和记得/知道反应来检验再认记忆,以估计再认和熟悉度,并使用自由联想任务来衡量概念性内隐记忆。结果表明,在参与者中,熟悉度而非再认与概念启动显著相关。相比之下,在实验 2 中,我们使用了类似的范式,比较了识别记忆 ROC 和外显联想线索回忆表现,表明线索回忆与再认和熟悉度都有关。这些结果与假设熟悉度为基础的识别和概念性内隐记忆依赖于相似的潜在过程的模型一致。