• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习表征多上下文环境:不仅仅是检测变化。

Learning to represent a multi-context environment: more than detecting changes.

作者信息

Qian Ting, Jaeger T Florian, Aslin Richard N

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 20;3:228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00228. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00228
PMID:22833727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3400979/
Abstract

Learning an accurate representation of the environment is a difficult task for both animals and humans, because the causal structures of the environment are unobservable and must be inferred from the observable input. In this article, we argue that this difficulty is further increased by the multi-context nature of realistic learning environments. When the environment undergoes a change in context without explicit cueing, the learner must detect the change and employ a new causal model to predict upcoming observations correctly. We discuss the problems and strategies that a rational learner might adopt and existing findings that support such strategies. We advocate hierarchical models as an optimal structure for retaining causal models learned in past contexts, thereby avoiding relearning familiar contexts in the future.

摘要

对动物和人类而言,学习环境的准确表征都是一项艰巨的任务,因为环境的因果结构不可观测,必须从可观测的输入中进行推断。在本文中,我们认为现实学习环境的多上下文性质进一步加剧了这一困难。当环境在没有明确提示的情况下发生上下文变化时,学习者必须检测到这种变化并采用新的因果模型来正确预测即将出现的观察结果。我们讨论了理性学习者可能采用的问题和策略,以及支持这些策略的现有研究结果。我们主张将分层模型作为保留在过去上下文中学习到的因果模型的最佳结构,从而避免在未来重新学习熟悉的上下文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f4/3400979/a49ca0cb518f/fpsyg-03-00228-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f4/3400979/a49ca0cb518f/fpsyg-03-00228-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f4/3400979/a49ca0cb518f/fpsyg-03-00228-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning to represent a multi-context environment: more than detecting changes.学习表征多上下文环境:不仅仅是检测变化。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 20;3:228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00228. eCollection 2012.
2
Statistical learning in the past modulates contextual cueing in the future.过去的统计学习会调节未来的情境线索效应。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 23;13(3):19. doi: 10.1167/13.3.19.
3
Detecting Changes and Avoiding Catastrophic Forgetting in Dynamic Partially Observable Environments.在动态部分可观测环境中检测变化并避免灾难性遗忘
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Dec 23;14:578675. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.578675. eCollection 2020.
4
Contextual cueing of visual attention.视觉注意的情境线索化
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 May;4(5):170-178. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01476-5.
5
Interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing.基于场景与基于阵列的情境线索之间的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):888-99. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0446-9.
6
Hierarchical acquisition of visual specificity in spatial contextual cueing.空间背景线索中视觉特异性的分层获取
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):160-72. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0754-8.
7
Hippocampus is necessary for spatial discrimination using distal cue-configuration.海马体对于利用远距离线索构型进行空间辨别是必需的。
Hippocampus. 2011 Jun;21(6):609-21. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20784. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
8
Human value learning and representation reflect rational adaptation to task demands.人类价值学习和表示反映了对任务需求的理性适应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Sep;6(9):1268-1279. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01360-4. Epub 2022 May 30.
9
Stimulus homogeneity enhances implicit learning: evidence from contextual cueing.刺激同质性增强内隐学习:来自情境线索化的证据。
Vision Res. 2014 Apr;97:108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
Preserved Contextual Cueing in Realistic Scenes in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.年龄相关性黄斑变性患者在现实场景中的保留情境线索效应
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):941. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120941.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive coding across the left fronto-temporal hierarchy during language comprehension.语言理解过程中左额颞叶层次结构的预测编码。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 4;33(8):4478-4497. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac356.
2
Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension.《饮奶茶?一种序贯事件理解的分层生成框架》
Top Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;13(1):256-298. doi: 10.1111/tops.12518. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Impairments in Probabilistic Prediction and Bayesian Learning Can Explain Reduced Neural Semantic Priming in Schizophrenia.

本文引用的文献

1
Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior?序列效应:迷信还是理性行为?
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2008;21:1873-1880.
2
Individual Differences in Developmental Plasticity May Result From Stochastic Sampling.发展可塑性的个体差异可能源于随机抽样。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;6(4):336-47. doi: 10.1177/1745691611412602.
3
SPEECH SEGMENTATION IN A SIMULATED BILINGUAL ENVIRONMENT: A CHALLENGE FOR STATISTICAL LEARNING?模拟双语环境中的语音分割:统计学习面临的挑战?
概率预测和贝叶斯学习的障碍可以解释精神分裂症中神经语义启动的减少。
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Dec 1;46(6):1558-1566. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa069.
4
A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.两种正性和 N400 的故事:在不同的表征水平上,由确认和违反预测引发的神经信号具有明显差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;32(1):12-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01465. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Statistical learning of multiple speech streams: A challenge for monolingual infants.多语音流的统计学习:对单语婴儿的挑战。
Dev Sci. 2020 Mar;23(2):e12896. doi: 10.1111/desc.12896. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Neural evidence for Bayesian trial-by-trial adaptation on the N400 during semantic priming.神经证据表明,在语义启动过程中,N400 上的贝叶斯逐试适应。
Cognition. 2019 Jun;187:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Developmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing.实时句子处理中快速适应冲突线索的发展时间表。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;43(1). doi: 10.1111/cogs.12704.
8
Inferring causes during speech perception.言语感知过程中的因果推断。
Cognition. 2018 May;174:55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.听觉对象识别的感知可塑性
Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00781. eCollection 2017.
10
Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures.读者将对新遇到的方言结构的适应推广到其他不熟悉的结构上。
J Mem Lang. 2016 Dec;91:28-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
Lang Learn Dev. 2009;5(1):30-49. doi: 10.1080/15475440802340101.
4
The nature of belief-directed exploratory choice in human decision-making.人类决策中信念导向的探索性选择的本质。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jan 31;2:398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00398. eCollection 2011.
5
Inferring relevance in a changing world.推断变化世界中的相关性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 24;5:189. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00189. eCollection 2011.
6
Causal structure learning over time: observations and interventions.随时间的因果结构学习:观测与干预。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Feb;64(1-2):93-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
7
Rational choice, context dependence, and the value of information in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).理性选择、情境依赖性与信息在欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)中的价值。
Science. 2011 Nov 18;334(6058):1000-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1209626.
8
Perceptual classification in a rapidly changing environment.在快速变化的环境中进行感知分类。
Neuron. 2011 Aug 25;71(4):725-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.022.
9
Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition.贝叶斯原教旨主义还是启蒙?论认知贝叶斯模型的解释地位和理论贡献。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Aug;34(4):169-88; disuccsion 188-231. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10003134.
10
Neuronal basis of sequential foraging decisions in a patchy environment.斑块环境中序列觅食决策的神经基础。
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun 5;14(7):933-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.2856.