• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛结果概况的探索性因素分析。

Exploratory factor analysis of the pain outcomes profile.

作者信息

Sipps Gary J, Howard Leon C

机构信息

The Center for Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, 1900 23rd Street, Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Mar;20(1):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9320-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10880-012-9320-5
PMID:22836786
Abstract

The Pain Outcomes Profile (POP) is a brief, multidimensional measure intended to assess pain intensity, functioning, and affect. It is presented as a practical measure with clinical utility. Results of studies support its concurrent, construct and predictive validity at the scale level. However, there have been no published studies of the measure at the item level. The present study was intended to assess the construct validity of the POP by way of factor analysis. A sample of 447 assessments of patients at a chronic non-cancer pain outpatient treatment center was employed. The 20 substantive items comprising the POP were entered into a factor analysis with oblique rotation. Five salient factors were obtained. Item-inclusion was generally consistent with factor loadings although noteworthy exceptions were observed in the Fear, Mobility and Vitality scales. Recommendations for further study and limitations of the current project are delineated.

摘要

疼痛结果概况(POP)是一种简短的多维测量工具,旨在评估疼痛强度、功能和情感。它是一种具有临床实用性的实用测量工具。研究结果支持其在量表层面的同时效度、结构效度和预测效度。然而,目前尚无关于该测量工具项目层面的已发表研究。本研究旨在通过因子分析评估POP的结构效度。我们采用了一个慢性非癌性疼痛门诊治疗中心447例患者评估的样本。将构成POP的20个实质性项目进行斜交旋转的因子分析。得到了五个显著因子。项目纳入通常与因子载荷一致,尽管在恐惧、活动能力和活力量表中观察到了值得注意的例外情况。文中还阐述了进一步研究的建议和当前项目的局限性。

相似文献

1
Exploratory factor analysis of the pain outcomes profile.疼痛结果概况的探索性因素分析。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Mar;20(1):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9320-5.
2
[Psychosomatic aspects of chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Psychometric results from the pilot phase of an interdisciplinary outpatient clinic].[慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的心身方面。一家跨学科门诊试点阶段的心理测量结果]
Schmerz. 2014 Jun;28(3):311-8. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1422-6.
3
[Depression, anxiety and stress scales: DASS--A screening procedure not only for pain patients].[抑郁、焦虑和压力量表:抑郁焦虑压力量表——一种不仅适用于疼痛患者的筛查程序]
Schmerz. 2015 Dec;29(6):649-57. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0019-z.
4
Validation of the Korean version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.慢性非癌性疼痛患者中文版疼痛灾难化量表的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1767-72. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0308-2. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
5
Measuring participation in patients with chronic back pain-the 5-Item Pain Disability Index.测量慢性腰痛患者的参与度——5 项疼痛残疾指数。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.172. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Developing a Short Multidimensional Measure of Pain Self-efficacy: The Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale-Short Form.开发一种简短的多维疼痛自我效能感测量工具:慢性疼痛自我效能感量表-简短版。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):e127-e136. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz041.
7
Assessing accident phobia in mild traumatic brain injury: The Accident Fear Questionnaire.评估轻度创伤性脑损伤中的事故恐惧症:事故恐惧问卷。
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Aug;61(3):317-327. doi: 10.1037/rep0000090. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Measuring avoidance of pain: validation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II-pain version.测量对疼痛的回避:接纳与行动问卷第二版疼痛版本的效度验证
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):125-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000044.
9
[Definition, diagnosis and therapy of chronic widespread pain and so-called fibromyalgia syndrome in children and adolescents. Systematic literature review and guideline].[儿童和青少年慢性广泛性疼痛及所谓纤维肌痛综合征的定义、诊断与治疗。系统文献综述与指南]
Schmerz. 2012 Jun;26(3):318-30. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1168-y.
10
Validation of the Brazilian brief version of the temperament auto-questionnaire TEMPS-A: the brief TEMPS-Rio de Janeiro.验证 TEMPS-A 气质自动问卷的巴西简版:里约热内卢简版 TEMPS。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Parkinson's Disease-Related Questionnaires in South Africa.帕金森病相关问卷在南非的验证
Parkinsons Dis. 2020 Jun 13;2020:7542138. doi: 10.1155/2020/7542138. eCollection 2020.
2
Patient-reported outcomes in a large community-based pain medicine practice: evaluation for use in phenotype modeling.大型社区疼痛医学实践中患者报告的结局:用于表型建模的评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 May 28;15:41. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0164-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
A Comparative Investigation of Rotation Criteria Within Exploratory Factor Analysis.探索性因素分析中旋转标准的比较研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2010 Jan 29;45(1):73-103. doi: 10.1080/00273170903504810.
3
A principal components analysis of negative affect-related constructs relevant to pain: evidence for a three component structure.与疼痛相关的负性情绪相关结构的主成分分析:三因素结构的证据。
J Pain. 2010 Aug;11(8):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.014. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
4
Optimal scoring of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory in a chronic pain sample.慢性疼痛样本中多维疼痛量表的最佳评分
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2008 Dec;15(4):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s10880-008-9131-x. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
5
Do psychosocial factors predict disability and health at a 3-year follow-up for patients with non-acute musculoskeletal pain? A validation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.心理社会因素能否预测非急性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者3年随访期的残疾情况和健康状况?对厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的验证。
Eur J Pain. 2008 Jul;12(5):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
6
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions.慢性疼痛的生物心理社会方法:科学进展与未来方向。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
7
Psychometric evaluation of osteoarthritis questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature.骨关节炎问卷的心理测量学评估:文献系统综述
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun 15;55(3):480-92. doi: 10.1002/art.22001.
8
Factor analysis validates the cluster structure of the dendrogram underlying the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) and challenges the a priori classification of the descriptors in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ).因子分析验证了多维情感与疼痛调查(MAPS)背后树状图的聚类结构,并对麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)中描述词的先验分类提出了挑战。
Pain. 2003 Dec;106(3):357-363. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.005.
9
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2001年总结
Adv Data. 2003 Aug 11(337):1-44.
10
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples.疼痛灾难化量表:对成人样本的进一步心理测量学评估。
J Behav Med. 2000 Aug;23(4):351-65. doi: 10.1023/a:1005548801037.