Twardowska-Hauser J
Katedry i Kliniki Psychiatrii AM w Poznaniu.
Psychiatr Pol. 1990 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-14.
Many authors underline that the investigations on depressive patients regard non-homogeneous groups of subjects because no unique, widely accepted diagnostic system exists. The aim of the work was to compare seven diagnostic systems (based on L.I.C.E.T-D) as well as to evaluate in to what extend the results obtained in different centers are comparable with each other. Thirty in-patients with depression were included. The results show the range of the diagnosis of depression (psychogenic and endogenous) in bipolar disorder reflects major depression in DSM-III, RDC, primary depression by Feighner, and endogenomorphic depression by Kleist and Berner as well.
许多作者强调,由于不存在唯一的、被广泛接受的诊断系统,对抑郁症患者的研究涉及的是不同质的受试者群体。这项工作的目的是比较七种诊断系统(基于L.I.C.E.T-D),并评估在不同中心获得的结果在多大程度上彼此可比。纳入了30名住院抑郁症患者。结果表明,双相情感障碍中抑郁症(心因性和内源性)的诊断范围与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版、研究诊断标准、费格纳的原发性抑郁症以及克莱斯特和伯纳的内源性抑郁症中的重度抑郁症相符。