• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[基于L.I.C.E.T-D 100的抑郁障碍诊断标准比较]

[Comparison of diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders based on L.I.C.E.T-D 100].

作者信息

Twardowska-Hauser J

机构信息

Katedry i Kliniki Psychiatrii AM w Poznaniu.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 1990 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-14.

PMID:2284366
Abstract

Many authors underline that the investigations on depressive patients regard non-homogeneous groups of subjects because no unique, widely accepted diagnostic system exists. The aim of the work was to compare seven diagnostic systems (based on L.I.C.E.T-D) as well as to evaluate in to what extend the results obtained in different centers are comparable with each other. Thirty in-patients with depression were included. The results show the range of the diagnosis of depression (psychogenic and endogenous) in bipolar disorder reflects major depression in DSM-III, RDC, primary depression by Feighner, and endogenomorphic depression by Kleist and Berner as well.

摘要

许多作者强调,由于不存在唯一的、被广泛接受的诊断系统,对抑郁症患者的研究涉及的是不同质的受试者群体。这项工作的目的是比较七种诊断系统(基于L.I.C.E.T-D),并评估在不同中心获得的结果在多大程度上彼此可比。纳入了30名住院抑郁症患者。结果表明,双相情感障碍中抑郁症(心因性和内源性)的诊断范围与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版、研究诊断标准、费格纳的原发性抑郁症以及克莱斯特和伯纳的内源性抑郁症中的重度抑郁症相符。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders based on L.I.C.E.T-D 100].[基于L.I.C.E.T-D 100的抑郁障碍诊断标准比较]
Psychiatr Pol. 1990 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-14.
2
[The difference between depression and melancholia: two distinct conditions that were combined into a single category in DSM-III].[抑郁症与 melancholia 的区别:在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版中被合并为单一类别的两种不同病症]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2012;114(8):886-905.
3
Borderline personality disorder characteristics in young adults with recurrent mood disorders: a comparison of bipolar and unipolar depression.复发性情绪障碍青年成人的边缘型人格障碍特征:双相抑郁与单相抑郁的比较
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jul;87(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.019.
4
[Importance of DSM IV (APA) and ICD-10 (WHO) in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(美国精神病学会)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(世界卫生组织)在心境障碍诊断与治疗中的重要性]
Encephale. 1995 Dec;21 Spec No 5:47-52.
5
Irritable-hostile depression: further validation as a bipolar depressive mixed state.易激惹-敌意性抑郁:作为双相抑郁混合状态的进一步验证
J Affect Disord. 2005 Feb;84(2-3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.07.006.
6
The clinical features of bipolar depression: a comparison with matched major depressive disorder patients.双相抑郁的临床特征:与匹配的重度抑郁障碍患者的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;62(3):212-6; quiz 217.
7
Differences in the ICD-10 diagnostic subtype of depression in bipolar disorder compared to recurrent depressive disorder.双相情感障碍与复发性抑郁症相比,抑郁症在ICD - 10诊断亚型上的差异。
Psychopathology. 2008;41(3):141-6. doi: 10.1159/000113006. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
8
DSM-III, RDC, and ECT: depressive subtypes and immediate response.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版、研究诊断标准及电休克治疗:抑郁亚型与即刻反应
J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Jan;45(1):14-8.
9
Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑症的研究用诊断标准(RDC)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)诊断标准的比较
Anxiety. 1996;2(2):71-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G.
10
RDC depressive subtypes: are they valid?研究诊断标准(RDC)中的抑郁亚型:它们有效吗?
J Clin Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;43(11):442-4.